140 likes | 161 Views
Time-of-Day / Energy Watch Pilot Programs. Program Design Preliminary Program Results Lessons Learned A/C Cool Credit. Time-of-Day/Energy Watch Pilot Programs. Focus Groups with Customers for program design Began marketing of programs to 5,000 Emmett customers Advertising Direct mail
E N D
Time-of-Day / Energy WatchPilot Programs • Program Design • Preliminary Program Results • Lessons Learned • A/C Cool Credit
Time-of-Day/Energy Watch Pilot Programs • Focus Groups with Customers for program design • Began marketing of programs to 5,000 Emmett customers • Advertising • Direct mail • Community Presentations • Employee Education • Response rate of 80 Energy Watch customers and 97 Time-of-Day Customers • EW – 80 on June 1 / 76 on August 31 • TOD- 97 on June 1 / 92 on August 31
Time-of-Day (TOD)Available: June-August 2005 • On-Peak • Monday-Friday 1:00 – 9:00 p.m. • 6.8686¢ / kWh (13% differential from Rate 1) • Mid-Peak • Monday-Friday 7:00 a.m. – 1:00 p.m. • 6.1717¢ / kWh (11% differential from On-Peak) • Off-Peak • Monday-Friday 9:00 p.m. – 7:00 a.m. • Saturday, Sunday, Holidays – All Hours • 5.3004¢ / kWh (30% differential from On-Peak) • Rate 1- Residential • 0-300 kWh - 5.428¢/ kWh • > 300 kWh – 6.0936¢/ kWh
Energy Watch (EW)Available: June-August 2005 • 10 EW days June 15 – August 15 • Notify Customers day-ahead by phone (Mosaix/operators) and Email (when available) • EW hours – 5:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Weekdays • Rate: 20¢ / kWh during EW hours • Rate: 5.428 ¢/kWh all other hours June 1–August 31 (Rate 1 – First Block Rate)
Customer Satisfaction • Customer Survey • Preliminary results: Participants overall were satisfied with programs • 60% would participate again • 50% would recommend to others • Bill Impact • From Survey • 44% believed bills decreased • 38% believed bills unchanged • 18% believed bills increased
Time-of-DayPreliminary Data Analysis • TOD • Load Impact • Load shift (decrease) was not statistically significant • Some load decrease during On-Peak hours • Some load increase during Off-Peak hours • Average Summer Bill Impact • Participant bills decreased $4.88 compared to Rate 1 • Non-Participant bills decreased $4.53 compared to Rate 1 • Participant bills decreased $10.57 (5 %) compared to Non-participants
Energy WatchPreliminary Data Analysis • Energy Watch • Load Impact • Substantial demand reduction during Energy Watch hours • 1.58 kW maximum average demand reduction • 1.33 kW average demand reduction • Demand reduction increased with temperature • Average Summer Bill Impact • Participant bills decreased $10.46 compared to Rate 1 • Non-Participant bills decreased $4.04 compared to Rate 1 • Participant bills decreased $22.26 (10 %) compared to Non-participants
Lessons Learned • Review program design • Adjust pricing to avoid Non-Participant benefits • Adjust pricing to encourage more load shifting • Labor Intensive/Not Scalable • Call Center / Meter Support • Corporate Communications • Corporate Publishing • Customer Satisfaction • Automated System(s) for Customer Notification
A/C Cool CreditAir Conditioner Cycling Program • What works? • Multiple Channels of Communication with the Customer/Participant • Participants have two types of communication needs--getting programmatic questions answered (non-time sensitive), and having problems solved under stress (time sensitive issues like equipment failure). Need redundant communication methods for both situations, including phone, email, web, collateral materials, stickers, etc. • Marketing • In marketing, lots of information (brochure) outperformed postcards. The Company received an 8% response rate vs. 2% response rate. • Documentation and Verification • Documenting and verifying information flow across all partners. Setting up information flows isn't enough, these must be tested and verified periodically to ensure processes are running smoothly.
2004 Load Curve, A/C Cool Credit • This chart provides the average load shape across all participants for the 50% and 67% cycling days in July to the average non-cycling days. The graph illustrates the observed drop in consumption during the control period and the associated increase in consumption following the control period or the “snapback” effect.