170 likes | 320 Views
Security WG: Report of the Spring 2013 Meeting. Bordeaux, France 18 April, 2013 Howard Weiss NASA/JPL/PARSONS howard.weiss@parsons.com +1-443-430-8089 skype : hsweiss. Meeting Agenda. 15 April 2013 08:30 – 09:30 : CCSDS Plenary 09:30 – 12:30 : Systems Engineering Area (SEA) Plenary
E N D
Security WG:Report of the Spring 2013 Meeting Bordeaux, France 18 April, 2013 Howard Weiss NASA/JPL/PARSONS howard.weiss@parsons.com +1-443-430-8089 skype: hsweiss
Meeting Agenda • 15 April 2013 • 08:30 – 09:30: CCSDS Plenary • 09:30 – 12:30: Systems Engineering Area (SEA) Plenary • 13:30 – 18:30: Security WG • Welcome, introductions, logistics, agenda review • Review results of Fall 2012 (Cleveland) meeting • Status of documents, action items • Charter review (updated per Cleveland mtg) • Algorithm Yellow Book Status and Testing • DLR testing complete & documented (Richter) • Any other testing plans? • Algorithm Green Book Review (Weiss)
Meeting Agenda (cont) • 16 April 2013 (08:30 – 18:30) • Key Management Blue Book (Fischer/Aguilar-Sanchez) • KM for SDLS extended procedures • Threat book re-write (Black/Weiss/Biggerstaff) • Network Layer Security Discussion (Weiss) • Adaptation profile outline • Testing agencies • Link Layer Security Update (Biggerstaff/Weiss/Aguilar-Sanchez) • Physical Layer Security (Aguilar-Sanchez) • Advanced Coding research • Joint security meeting with DTN Working Group • Other areas of discussion • Proposed new areas of work • 17 April 2013 • 08:30-18:30: Space Data Link Security WG • 18 April 2013 • 08:30-12:30: Space Data Link Security WG • 13:30-18:00: SEA Wrap-up Plenary
Executive Summary • Attendees from UK Space Agency, ESA/ESTEC, ESA/ESOC, DLR, CNES, GMC, BITTT, and NASA/JPL. Due to sequestration budget issues NASA Johnson, Goddard, and Glenn representatives were unable to travel. • Reviewed charter updates approved by CESG after Cleveland meeting. Also reviewed projects framework and updated the Algorithms Green Book and Key Management Blue Book schedules. • Reviewed action items – all except for three were completed. • Reviewed “management remarks on Security WG” with Martin Pilgram. Provided updated language regarding Security WG strategic plan. • Algorithm Yellow Book: No other Agencies have any plans for additional Algorithms testing. • Reviewed draft of Algorithm Green Book. Very few changes. • Reviewed status of Network Layer Security: adaption profile discussions with Tom Gannett. Request for additional testing to GRC. • Reviewed the KM Blue Book progress and the integration with the SDLS extended procedures directions. • Discussed ESA-sponsored advanced coding research program: AJ. • Discussed directions for Threat Green Book revision. • Held joint meeting with DTN WG to discuss DTN security. • SDLS: revisions to Red-3, extended procedures, SLP.
Summary of Goals and Deliverables • Provided SecWG “strategic goal” wording. • Draft of Algorithm Green Book reviewed: document almost complete. • KM Blue Book for symmetric KM making good progress. Since it is abstract, we’ve discussed making this a Magenta Book. • Discussed revisions to the Threat Green Book. • Discussed direction for network layer security “adaptation” profile. Investigate how IPsec could be used over non-IP protocols. Need additional agencies to volunteer for testing in addition to NASA/GRC. • Reviewed SDLS progress in SecWG • Joint meeting with DTN WG for DTN security. • ESA research on advanced coding techniques to avoid jamming.
SEA Area MID-TERM REPORT SUMMARY TECHNICAL STATUS • Security WG • Goal: • Working Status: Active _X_ Idle ____ • Summary progress: documents actively being produced: Key Management BB, Algorithms GB, Threat GB revision, Network Layer BB. All docs green. • Progress since last meeting: algorithm YB done, algorithm GB almost complete. Other books progressing. • Problems and Issues: Resources – Lose of NASA resources is a major issue.
Open Issues • Deciding which new areas to work on. • Discussions in SecWG regarding IOAG, CMC, CESG direction/requirements. • Currently SecWG has done “speculative” development. • Should it be requirements driven?
Resource Problems • Resources had been adequate to perform the current tasks although personnel have only limited time percentage to apply to CCSDS tasks. Recent loss of NASA personnel will hurt unless they can be restored to attend meetings.
Risk Management Update • Must ensure that the current trend of additional resources remains and that resources don’t shrink. UK Space Agency has only provided miniscule resources so that they cannot be effective.
Cross Area WG / BOF Issues • Joint meeting with Space Data Link Security WG • Joint meeting with DTN WG • Continued interaction with Spacecraft Monitoring & Control although no joint meeting in Bordeaux.