160 likes | 306 Views
Classifying Earthquakes in the NGAW2 Catalog A Methodology for Classifying Earthquakes for Ground Motion Estimation. Katie Wooddell 10/ 25/ 2011. NGA Ground Motion Observations. Median ground motions from aftershocks are systematically lower than median ground motions from mainshocks
E N D
Classifying Earthquakes inthe NGAW2 CatalogA Methodology for Classifying EarthquakesforGround MotionEstimation Katie Wooddell 10/25/2011
NGA Ground Motion Observations • Median ground motions from aftershocks are systematically lower than median ground motions from mainshocks • Large variability in event terms for both mainshocks and aftershocks
PGA Event Terms based on Crude Classification (Used by AS08) PLACEHOLDER FOR FIGURES FROM NAA
NGA Conclusions • Systematic difference in median short period spectral acceleration for mainshocks and aftershocks • Consistent with lower stress drops for aftershocks • Need to account for this difference in GMPEs • Issue: Definition of aftershock was not clear
NGA West 2 Event Classifications • CLASS 1 EVENTS: Events with systematically higher median ground motions • CLASS 2 EVENTS: Events with systematically lower median ground motions • Subsequent events in a time window, X, following an earthquake • Events close to the rupture plane
Identifying Class 1 and Class 2 Events GARDNER-KNOPOFF ALGORITHM: Dependent events (“aftershocks”) must fall within both a time and distance window determined by the magnitude of the mainshock • Pros: • Provides a good starting point and framework for distinguishing between Class 1 and 2 events. • Simple time and distance windows that are easy to apply and modify. • Does not require a complete catalog. • Cons: • Class 2 Events are misclassified as Class 1 Events when the rupture plane is long. • Class 1 Events (off-plane events) can be misclassified as Class 2 Events (on-plane events)
2008 Wenchuan, China 65 Earthquakes Declustered Results: 39 Class 2 Events Associated with the 2008 Wenchuan, China Earthquake
Identifying Class 1 and Class 2 Events • Modifications to the Distance Window Criteria: • Fault geometries used for faults (if available) • Fault trace, depth to top of rupture, dip, and dip direction specified for each fault trace • Distance calculated between the surface projection of the Class 1 Event fault plane and potential Class 2 Events in the database (ΔRJB) • A maximum allowable ΔRJB is selected based on ground motion properties • Modifications to the Time Window Criteria: • Currently no modifications have been made • Proposed Modifications: • Time dependent ΔRJBto account for healing in the crust
Identifying Class 1 and Class 2 Events ΔRJB = 0 km 65 Events Total 1 Cluster 35 Clustered Events
Identifying Class 1 and Class 2 Events ΔRJB = 2 km 65 Events Total 3 Clusters 41 Events-Cluster 1 2 Events-Cluster 2 3 Events-Cluster3
Identifying Class 1 and Class 2 Events ΔRJB = 5 km 65 Events Total 3 Clusters 48 Events-Cluster 1 5 Events-Cluster 2 2 Events-Cluster3
Event Terms for Class 1 & Class 2 Earthquakes PLACEHOLDER FOR FIGURES FROM NAA
Conclusions • Systematic difference in ground motions from Class 1 & Class 2 events that needs to be included in the GMPEs • We propose the following classifications for the NGAW2 GMPEs: • Class 1 Events: Events (ΔRJB > ??) with systematically higher median ground motions including mainshocks, off-plane events, and triggered events. • Class 2 Events: Events (ΔRJB < ??) with systematically lower median ground motions (on-plane events)