110 likes | 227 Views
SAC 6 Revision. Sustaining Outdoor Environments. Evaluating. Judgement Pros Cons Example Relate. Management Strategies. Both private and public land Make sure you read the question carefully Action vs Strategy A wide variety Contemporary Indigenous land management. VNVF. Purpose
E N D
SAC 6 Revision • Sustaining Outdoor Environments
Evaluating • Judgement • Pros • Cons • Example • Relate
Management Strategies • Both private and public land • Make sure you read the question carefully • Action vs Strategy • A wide variety • Contemporary Indigenous land management
VNVF • Purpose • Outline • Pros and Cons • Effectiveness • Implications on land owners and managers • Make sure you have appropriate environments to discuss
Acts • Purpose • How it works • What it protects? • Effectiveness • Both Acts
There is a checklist that is used to assess this Nominations that satisfy the regulations are forwarded to the TSSC A PPAL of nominations are given to the minister Follows a strategic approach; Conservation theme, level of threat etc. An invitation to nominate is extended by the minister each year Nomination: Any person may nominate Minister decides on the FPAL Finalised Priority assessment List All of this info is placed on the DSEWPac Website This advise is given to the minister Minister notifies the nominator After FPAL assessment period begins Public and expert comments are assessed Minister decides to list the species or not After public consultation the TSSC considers if it eligible for listing and in which category
No Frivolous nominations may be rejected Minister decides if nomination meets regulations Nominations given to the AHC SNRP, ANP May be a theme must check that it isnt listed Public nominations invited AHC prepares a priority assessment list for consideration list is then approved by the minister this is what the AHC works on for the next 12 months public comment is invited AHC also consults with land owners Minister notifies the nominator and land owners also advised Final assessment list is placed on the internet Minister considers the assessment report and comments to decide to list the place or not AHC gives and assessment report to the minister
Great Keppel Island tourism and marina development has gone through this process minister has 20 business days to decide if the action requires assessment As part of the 20 days the public has 10 days to comment It was seen that the development at GKI would have significant impacts on matters of NES use the referral form and submitted to the minister The developers submit a referral Decision Made if significant damage is seen to occur controlled actions are put in place Qld gov also doing an eis to look at state and local impacts GKI is preparing a EIS as instructed under the act Controlled actions: the project will be assessed a variety of methods can be used 40 business days given to make a final decision Final EIS is submitted to the minister Public will be asked to comment of the draft EIS any comments/concerns will need to be addressed in the final eis
Actions • Specific examples - Companies and individuals • Green building design - grass roof, insulation, recycled materials, vacuum sealed doors, double galzing, room orientation (specific examples) • Renewable Energy - PV Cells, Wind, Solar (specific examples) • Individual and groups