300 likes | 421 Views
Quantum Information at Queen’s University. Stuart Swain Andrew Whitaker Myungshik Kim Jim McCann Dmitri Sokolovski Jinhyoung Lee Mauro Paternostro Wonmin Son Helen McAnerny Derek Wilson Hyungsuk Jeong Eileen Nugent Liang-You Peng. Quantum Information at Queen’s.
E N D
Quantum Information at Queen’s University • Stuart Swain • Andrew Whitaker • Myungshik Kim • Jim McCann • Dmitri Sokolovski • Jinhyoung Lee • Mauro Paternostro • Wonmin Son • Helen McAnerny • Derek Wilson • Hyungsuk Jeong • Eileen Nugent • Liang-You Peng
Quantum Information at Queen’s • Quantum Algorithms • Optical realisation of QIP • Complementarity and Fidelity • Decoherence and non-Markovian processes • Many-body entanglement and • nonlocality for continuous variable states • Solid-state realisation of QIP • Nonlinear Atom Optics • Laser cooling • Coherent control • Squeezed light and matter
Nonlinear Atom Optics:Mode Conversion in Trapped Atomic Condensates Jim McCann, Eileen Nugent, Dermot McPeake • Coherent atom excitations • Wave mixing • Mode conversion in traps • Mode conversion in lattices
Condensate basics • Macroscopic quantum state • Bosons: high occupation • High phase-space density • Nonlinearity UK Cold Atom Network Ed Hinds (ICSTM) Charles Adams (Durham) Labs: St. Andrews, Strathclyde, Glasgow, Durham, Manchester, Oxford, UCL, ICSTM, NPL, Sussex
Atom Optics and Quantum Information • Coherent matter waves • Macroscopic quantum state • Manipulation by external fields beams, microtraps, lattices, lenses, chips • Tunable interactions (entanglement): kinetic and potential energy control • Control: Superfluid <-> Insulator • Coherent atom device as register, amplifier or reservoir
Cold atom engineering Hinds and Hughes (1999) J. Phys. D 32 119 Atoms in microtraps and on chips (ICSTM) Reichel and Haensch (MPQ, Garching) Chikkatur et al (MIT) 2002 Science 296, 2193
First-order coherence Andrews et al (1997) Science 275 637-41 Observation of interference between two Bose condensates
Spatial coherence: millimetres I. Bloch, T. W. Haensch & T. Esslinger, Nature 403, p166 (2000)
Coherent output coupling Coherent splitting of condensate with optical Bragg scattering Kozuma et al (1999) Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 871
Nonlinear atom optics Deng et al (NIST) Nature398, 218 - 220 (1999); Four-wave mixing
Nonlinear atom optics in traps Single quasiparticle excitations (low temperature) f i V i k Wave-mixing collisions f j Wave-mixing processes include: Sum-frequency mixing, second harmonic generation, parametric down conversion
Collective excitations in traps 10 ms snapshots Miesner et al Science 279, 1005 (1998)
Quantized modes forAtoms in spherical traps Breather Experiment (JILA) Cornell & Wieman et al. Theory (Oxford/NIST) Burnett & Clark et al. Quadrupole Changing the axial confinement creates shape oscillations of the cloud well-defined quantized modes
Atoms in spheroidal traps Atoms trapped by external fields in a pancake shape cloud Breather Quadrupole k 2k f k Resonance near
Hechenblaikner & Foot et al., PRL 84 , 2056 (2000) 20,000 atoms of Rb • Second Harmonic Generation • observed near phase matching • conditions • Component at 2ω in the • axial direction • Observation of ‘radial freezing’ • at phase matching resonance
Bogoliubov model Many-body Hamiltonian Wavefunction = condensate+ thermal component where
Thermal component expanded in quasi-particle functions where Eigenvalues give excitation frequencies ω Ideal gas modes: Oscillator (Traps) Bloch (Lattices) Interacting gas modes: quasiparticle states
Wave mixing in Condensates k 2k k f Optics Coupling strength=scattering amplitude (Morgan,Burnett et al)
Spectrum of excitations (Rb) Bogoliubov and hydrodynamic (inset) frequency predictions of the lowest four even parity, m= 0, excitations.
Hybrid Bogoliubov modes mode amplitudes =1.35:Modes have characteristic surface and monopole nature. =1.60, 1.65: Modes hybridize at the anticrossing with the result that one of them has zero overlap with the quadrupole l= 2. =1.75: The modes regain their characteristic form.
Hybrid mode coupling dark state 2-state model
Coupling to shape oscillations radial Width axial time
Conversion efficiency Axial width Radial width Red -> Resonance -> Blue
Spectrum at phase matching Second harmonic doublet fundamental third harmonic Down conversion
Mode conversion in lattices • intersecting beams of light cool atoms • atoms trapped at dark spots
Superfluid-Insulator transition (1) tunneling dominated: superfluid delocalized state, coherent state (2) interaction dominated: insulator localized state, Fock (number) state Haensch et al (2002) Nature 415 39-44
Mode conversion in lattices Bose-Hubbard model Jaksch et al (1998) Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3108. J= tunneling U=interaction Tight-binding functions, small occupation
Current work: wave mixing in lattices Bogoliubov spectrum Bloch wave spectrum Energy Energy Second Harmonic Condensate density Height of barrier between wells Louis et al (2003) PRA 67 013602
Lattice output reading Coherent emission from lattice loaded with condensate : interference pulses in region A. Pulse period ~1 msec ~h/mgDz
Conclusions • Qualitative agreement theory/experiment • Mode conversion in trapped condensates: easy but complicated • Hybrid and dark states affect process • Third harmonic generation, down conversion and four-wave mixing • Control of coherent excitation within trap – more difficult than it appeared • Lattice mode mixing is even more complex