110 likes | 266 Views
AiP Review Workshop. THROUGH. APPRECIATIVE. INQUIRY. (AI). Quick Introduction!. AiP Review. JISC. AGENDA. WHAT’S WORKING WELL?. EXAMPLES FROM OTHER INSTITUTIONS. FUTURE OF THE AiP. FEEDBACK SO FAR. Edward de Bono: Six Thinking Hats. Negative Black Hat.
E N D
AiP Review Workshop THROUGH APPRECIATIVE INQUIRY (AI)
Quick Introduction! AiP Review JISC
AGENDA WHAT’S WORKING WELL? EXAMPLES FROM OTHER INSTITUTIONS FUTURE OF THE AiP FEEDBACK SO FAR
“The pessimistic view” “It is much easier to be negative, it is more fun to be negative” “Black hat thinking is not concerned with problem solving – only with pointing out the problem” “Points out faults in a design” The criticizing hat “Attacking an idea give an instant feeling of superiority” Negative Black Hat
? What is working well with the AiP? • What sections of the process are valuable? What is appreciated? • What would you not like to loose?
Spend a few minutes looking at examples from other institutions, is there anything appealing? Do you know any other examples not shown that are worth discussing? Or perhaps from your job at a previous institution? External Approval Process Practices
? What does your ideal AiP look like? Draw the future AiP
THANKS FROM THE CDATA PROJECT TEAM Your feedback has been invaluable!