240 likes | 358 Views
U.S Licensing System & Enforcement Activity. OCTOBER 5, 2011 MAIN MEETING OF OZONE ACTION NETWORKS FROM LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN Staci Gatica gatica.staci@epa.gov. Presentation Topics. Mechanics of U.S. Licensing System and Phaseout Focus on Imports Used vs. virgin ODS
E N D
U.S Licensing System& Enforcement Activity OCTOBER 5, 2011 MAIN MEETING OF OZONE ACTION NETWORKS FROM LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN Staci Gatica gatica.staci@epa.gov
Presentation Topics Mechanics of U.S. Licensing System and Phaseout Focus on Imports Used vs. virgin ODS Petition process Collaboration to Identify Illegal Activity Enforcement of Regulations Recent Illegal Trade Other Types of Violations
U.S. Licensing System to Ensure Compliance Licenses (“allowances”) needed to produce or import bulk HCFCs “Baselines” established for individual companies effective in 2003 (production & consumption) Baselines based on historical consumption data of each company Goal: Avoid disruption of existing market Current phaseout approach: Baseline allowances reduced proportionately via regulation to implement and domestic regulations and Protocol goals Also a “worst first” phaseout approach “Exemptions” needed for CFCs, MeBr and other phased-out ODS
HCFC Allowance Expenditure Consumption Allowances • 1 allowance = 1 kg of chemical Production Allowances Domestic Production = 1 consumption + 1 production allowance for each kg produced in U.S. Import = 1 consumption allowance for each kg imported in the U.S.
Trade of Allowances Allowances are tradable between companies and between chemicals Trades allow new entrants into the HCFC market EPA must be notified of trade EPA must process request within 3 days, or it happens automatically EPA notification is very important EPA should at ALL times know what companies have allowances to import ODS
Total Projected R-22 Servicing Demand & EPA’s 2010-2014 Initially Developed Allocations of HCFC-22 Implementation of HCFC Phaseout Next major milestone under Montreal Protocol: 90% HCFC reduction from 2003 baseline by 2015 Projected Unmet Need for R-22
ODS Tracking System (ODSTS) Collect CBI data from about 80 companies ODSTS contains significant data from reports (i.e., producer, importer, exporter, destruction, transformation, etc.) Electronic templates for major reports The ODSTS tracks allowances to ensure compliance under Protocol Balance statements (per transaction) All trades contained in the system ODSTS analyzes data and produces reports (i.e., Article 7 for UNEP) Data Summary Reports E-Reporting Templates HARD COPY FORMS Ozone Depleting Substance Tracking System (ODSTS)
Maintaining Tracking and Reporting Data Continuity E-Reporting Templates Hard Copy Forms ODS Tracking System Data Summary Reports
Recordkeeping & Reporting Requirements Found in 40 CFR part 82.13 and 82.24 Production, Import and Exports reported quarterly A variety of other forms exist (i.e., destruction) 25+ reporting forms (http://www.epa.gov/ozone/record) Class I Class II Methyl Bromide Reporting forms are always changing as regulations change due to phaseout Guidance for reporting entities Stakeholder input is helpful to form development
Importing Used ODS – Petition Process • Import petition required for shipments over 5 pounds • Petition contains a number of informational elements • Purpose: to help EPA determine that the material is in fact, used • Petition must be submitted to EPA at least 40 before shipment is to leave port of export • EPA will investigate source information • EPA mails or faxes either an objection (non-approval) or non-objection (approval) letter to petitioner • Petition and non-objection letter must accompany shipment through U.S. Customs
Importing Virgin ODS CFCs Customs typically stops import of virgin CFCs Call EPA on a case-by-case basis Such imports are rare HCFCs EPA worked with Customs to put a criteria hit into their Automated Commercial System (ACS) database A comprehensive system that tracks, controls, and processes commercial goods imported into the U.S Customs is told to contact EPA to confirm import of HCFCs into the U.S. EPA is available 24-hour via cell phone to work with Customs EPA verifies against ODSTS Any illegal activity is referred to Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assistance – civil and criminal divisions
Customs/EPA Process to Combat Illegal Trade STOP! Customs Inspector stops shipment because of HTS criteria hit Customs Inspector calls EPA to check on clearance EPA checks whether shipment is legal EPA calls Customs to clear shipment for import or ask them to seize it
Sharing Information & Intelligence Network! Customs and Border Protection specific training and conferences Joint EPA/Criminal Investigation Division and CBP “sting” operation EPA bi-annual regional conference Communicate! EPA holds monthly conference calls with our Regional EPA contacts on enforcement issues Quarterly information exchange with stakeholders (i.e., Alliance) to get “tips” in illegal activity Leverage Resources! Work with our Office of Enforcement and Compliance here at EPA to get access to Customs and Border Protection import entry data to analyze against our ODSTS (ODS tracking system)
Enforcement of ODS Regulation Two general types of enforcement actions Civil and criminal Criminal – must show intent by defendant to break the law Ultimate penalties vary – fines, community service, probation, imprisonment The Stratospheric Protection Division (SPD) “Program office” does not enforce regulations EPA’s Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assistance (OECA) have enforcement authority over our regulations Great coordination between SPD and OECA Mindset – always aim to maintain that coordination Try to prepare for rise in illegal activity Details of investigation are maintained in OECA Intelligence gathered via research, tips, inspections and online reporting, international collaboration http://www.epa.gov/compliance/ (click on the badge in the corner)
Recent Case Studies on Illegal Trade Lateral Investments On July 29, 2011, Brendan Clery was sentenced to 18 months in prison for illegally importing HCFC-22, contrary to the provisions of the Clean Air Act (CAA). In addition, he was ordered to pay a $40,000 criminal fine and forfeit illegal proceeds in the amount of $935,240. Between June and August 2007, Clery illegally smuggled into the United States approximately 278,256 kilograms, or 20,460 cylinders, of restricted HCFC-22, with a market value of $1,438,270. At no time did Clery or his company Lateral Investments hold unexpended consumption allowances that would have allowed them to legally import the refrigerant. Facts about the case: Cleary created import business in Florida with intent to import illegal refrigerant, among other items The product came from China This case of part of a larger criminal investigation known as “Operation Catch-22” Investigation team: Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Criminal Investigation Bureau, and prosecuted by special assistant U. S. Attorney Jodi A. Mazer
Recent Case Studies on Illegal Trade Harp USA, Inc. On February 11, 2011, Harp USA Inc. (Harp), a Florida corporation, pled guilty and was sentenced today in connection with false statements made in entry documents for the importation of used HCFC-22 refrigerant. Harp’s plea included admittance to importing approximately 1,874 cylinders (approx 25,000 kg) into the U.S. using false invoices and statements resulting in three years of probation and a $206,140 criminal fine. Harp was also ordered to perform community service by making a $25,000 payment to the Southern Environmental Enforcement Training Fund, a not-for-profit training organization. In addition, as a special condition of probation, Harp was ordered to implement and enforce an Environmental Compliance Plan and to reimburse the government for costs associated with the storage and handling of the merchandise. Facts about the case: The product came from the UK – claimed refrigerant was used The petition that was submitted to EPA was reviewed and a “non objection letter” provided Upon further review and before the shipment arrived, EPA realized the petition contained false statements EPA regulations (82.24(c)(4)(vi) state that if new information is found after a non-objection letter is provided that indicate false information, then EPA can take enforcment action Investigation team: Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Criminal Investigation Bureau, Miami-Dade Police Department and prosecuted by special assistant U. S. Attorney Jodi A. Mazer This is the US’s first prosecution for false statements contained in a petition to import used ODS 19
Recent Case Studies on Illegal Trade Correa, Falcon, Nova, and Urena On October 20, 2010, John Correa, Abdiel Falcon, Charles Nova, and Blasdimir Urena each pled guilty to the felony charge of violating 18 USC 545 for importing merchandise (23,079 kg of HCFC-22 with a FMV of approximately $257,944) contrary to the CAA in that they did not hold unexpended consumption allowances. Sentencing for all 4 defendants was scheduled for December 29, 2010. Results: 1-5 years of probation, storage and destruction fees. Facts about the case: The HCFC-22 was Chinese manufactured The HCFC-22 was sent to the DR - we do not know if the import was legal or illegal. We do not know how it got to the DR. We know the defendants “learned the smuggle scheme” from someone; we do not know who taught them. Investigation team: Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Criminal Investigation Bureau, and prosecuted by special assistant U. S. Attorney Jodi A. Mazer
Recent Case Studies on Illegal Trade Kroy Corporation and James Garrido On February 11, 2010 James Garrido and Kroy Corporation were each sentenced today by U.S. District Court Judge Patricia A. Seitz. Garrido was sentenced to 30 months’ imprisonment, to be followed by three years of supervised release. Kroy Corporation was sentenced to five years of probation. Additionally, Garrido and Kroy were sentenced, jointly and severally, to pay a criminal fine of $40,000, and were further ordered to forfeit $1,356,160 to the United States. Facts about the case: The HCFC- was produced in China The HCFC-22 was sent to the Dominican Republic (DR) - we do not know if the import into DR was legal or illegal The shipment was not defined as a transshipment Multi-Agency team received a 2010 U.S. EPA Montreal Protocol Award Team: EPA Region 4, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Justice
Other Types of Violations Illegal trade (imports) is only one type of violation Other types include improper management of ODS: Venting Improper disposal techniques Servicing by a technician without certification from an approved certification program Selling ODS to uncertified technician Failure to repair leaks Tax evasion (CFC tax) http://www.epa.gov/ozone/enforce/
Information on Alternativeshttp://www.epa.gov/ozone/intpol/mpagreement.html • 24