340 likes | 497 Views
An Improvement Clinic. Why QI ?. Best-known science is not reliably applied Inefficiencies waste resource Patients are being harmed. “ Between the health care we have and the care we could have lies not just a gap, but a chasm.” - Institute of Medicine, Crossing the Quality Chasm, 2001.
E N D
Why QI ? Best-known science is not reliably applied Inefficiencies waste resource Patients are being harmed “Between the health care we have and the care we could have lies not just a gap, but a chasm.” - Institute of Medicine, Crossing the Quality Chasm, 2001
Aims • To develop an ability to support, develop and influence a Quality Improvement intervention
You are giving feedback • We want you to give feed back to this team: • We will give you two scenarios.
Daily Goals - Some Key Issues: Interdisciplinary communication tool > importance than specific statements Modify form to meet needs Not necessary to make form part of medical record Reduced length of stay by one day Improving Communication in the ICU Using Daily Goals Journal of Critical Care 2003;18:71-75
Setting Daily Goals Started Nov 08 – initially good progress Initially very nurse led Drs required lots of prompting – this has significantly improved Still 2 or 3 late adopters (out of 9) Very popular with nurses – clarifies what needs to be done
Setting Daily Goals Spread from one ICU to another Compliance dropped from 100% to 60% Varies on a week to week basis
You are asked for advice What advice do you have to help the team? Should they go for perfection - every patient every time ?
ADEPT • Aim (or objective) • Data • Evidence • PDSA or process (small steps of change) • Team (including patients and carers) (Bernard Crump)
AIM NEEDS • Priority • How will we tell if its improving ? • Absolute level of performance (agree locally) • DATE • Some is not a number…..soon is not a time • Segment • But stretch goals/aims
The problem Anecdotes of CRBSIs Not enough evidence Lack of guidance for doctors and nurses No idea of complication rate until a recent study
Study Showed • Over a 6 month period 75 CVCs were inserted in ICU. 11 proved positive for bloodstream infection translating to an infection rate of 14.6% • Lines inserted in the radiology department have an infection rate of “up to 18%” • 2 CVCs were inserted in patients in theatre and one of these developed a bloodstream infection
Mission Statement • Within 6 months there will be no central venous access device infections at this hospital
Feedback • To encourage • To guide • To teach • Listen and learn from everyone “All teach, all learn”
Feedback • Encourage • Pareto chart probably incorrect- based on consensus opinion • Email Everyone • Failure to segment • Large test of change • Good to copy other guideline and change- one thing in one place wont work with another • Aim is good BUT:-
5 Times - WHY ? • Ask why 5 times • Need more knowledge - don’t assume one cause or solution
The Five Whys ? Repeatedly ask the question ‘why?' (5 - rule of thumb) - peel away the layers of an issue, just like the layers of an onion, Can lead you to the root cause of a problem. May need > or < 5 times to get to origin of a problem. The key is to avoid assumptions and logic traps and encourage the team to keep drilling down to the real root cause.
The Five Whys ? When does it work best?: Quickly identifies source of an issue or problem - focus resources on correct areas Tackles true cause not symptom How to use it: Write down specific problem- formalizes problem – describe accurately. Helps team focus on same problem
focus on improvement focus on differences focus on “worst”
7 Spreadly Sins (RC Lloyd and associates IHI) Start with large pilots Find one person willing to do it all Use vigilance and hard work If a pilot works - spread the pilot unchanged Make the person and team who drove the pilot responsible for system wise spread Look at process and outcome measures on a quarterly basis Expect early marked improvement without attention to process reliability
Example 1 Patient late in theatre, it caused a delay. Why? There was a long wait for a trolley. Why? A replacement trolley had to be found. Why? The original trolley's safety rail was worn and had eventually broken. Why?It had not been regularly checked for wear. Why? The root cause - there is no equipment maintenance schedule.
Example 1 Root cause - No equipment maintenance schedule. Setting up proper maintenance schedule ensures patients should never again be late due to faulty equipment. Reduces delays and improves flow. If simply repair the trolley or do a one-off safety rail check, the problem may happen again sometime in the future
The Five Whys ? Use brainstorming to ask why the problem occurs then, write the answer down. If this answer doesn't identify the source of the problem, ask ‘why?' again and write that answer down Loop back to step three until the team agrees that they have identified the problem's root cause. Again, this may take fewer or more than five ‘whys?'