1 / 52

Three goals:

WG5 - User Needs and Quality Framework for Common Access Points Israel Coordinator - Susan Hazan 5 Web sites MINERVA Plus Berlin 7-8 March 2005 Kunstgewerbemuseum. WG5 - User Needs and Quality Framework for Common Access Points Israel Coordinator - Susan Hazan. Three goals:.

garnet
Download Presentation

Three goals:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. WG5 - User Needs and Quality Framework for Common Access PointsIsrael Coordinator - Susan Hazan 5 Web sites MINERVA PlusBerlin 7-8 March 2005 Kunstgewerbemuseum

  2. WG5 - User Needs and Quality Framework for Common Access PointsIsrael Coordinator - Susan Hazan Three goals: • In preparation for MINERVA Plus meeting • As a preparatory exercise for New Media web development team at the Israel Museum, Jerusalem • To interrogate the 10 quality principles

  3. WG5 - User Needs and Quality Framework for Common Access Points 5 Web sites

  4. Israel MuseumJERUSALEMwww.imj.org.ilBotanical GardenJERUSALEMwww.botanic.co.ililMuseumsIsrael Museums Guidewww.ilmuseums.comThe Spielberg Jewish Film Archive JERUSALEMwww.spielbergfilmarchive.org.ilCenter of Digital Art Lab HOLONwww.digitalartlab.org.il

  5. I. Transparent * Is a visual mission statement appropriate? * Easy to switch mission statement languages

  6. II. Effective User needs have been drawn up based on research involving user groups * Site search facility in place (drop-down or fully searchable key term search?)

  7. III. Maintained *4 websites tracked over a six week period

  8. IV. Accessible This section presents a checklist to evaluate the site. It should be noted that there are a large number of accessibility checkpoints -these are best explored by consulting the W3C guidelines at http://www.w3.org/WAI/Yes /No/n.a

  9. V. User-centred

  10. VI. Responsive * Site links to another highly responsive site

  11. VII. Multi-linguality * Simple switching between languages?

  12. VIII. Interoperable

  13. IX. Managed

  14. X. Preserved

More Related