230 likes | 621 Views
ICT Tools for Poverty Monitoring. Faster, cheaper, better analysisUse for PRSPs and development strategiesSetting of targets (e.g., growth path and poverty)Costing of targets (e.g., education, health)M
E N D
1. ICT Tools for Poverty Monitoring Introduction to SimSIP
2. ICT Tools for Poverty Monitoring Faster, cheaper, better analysis
Use for PRSPs and development strategies
Setting of targets (e.g., growth path and poverty)
Costing of targets (e.g., education, health)
M&E of targets (e.g., cross-country comparable data bases)
Governance and transparency (e.g., e-databases)
Key challenges
Choosing the right tool for each question
Understanding the limits/weaknesses of each tool
Ensuring replicable results
Training stakeholders (empowerment through information)
Simplicity rules for policy impact !!!
3. Examples of ICT Tools “Easier” Statistics & Econometrics
“Ado” files in Stata (e.g., propensity score matching)
Poverty mapping routines in SAS
Easy-to-use Excel-based tools – examples at the World Bank
SimSIP
PAMS (macro consistency framework + hh data)
PovStat (similar to SimSIP Poverty, but with unit level data)
Other easy to use tools
DAD (Laval University)
Other tools
Data mining
Comparable survey data bases & indicators
Etc.
4. “Easier” Statistics & Econometrics Example of “ado” files in stata
Propensity score matching
Inequality estimation and decompositions
Poverty estimation and decomposition
Robust poverty comparisons
Example for poverty mapping
SAS program to handle large data sets (Lanjouw et al.)
Many applications
Basic poverty maps based on census-survey data
Estimation of poverty for small survey population (e.g., disabled in Uganda)
Health maps (infant mortality, malnutrition)
Decentralized policy making stools
Etc.
5. Excel-based tools: the case of SimSIP SimSIP Modules
Poverty
Evaluation
Determinants of Poverty
Education targets costing (also health, others)
Debt sustainability
Indirect taxation and welfare
Pension reform
Subsidy analysis (utilities)
Other modules in development ….
Today’s presentation
Poverty Module in some detail
Basics of Evaluation Module
6. SimSIP Poverty The Tool : The Lorenz Curve
Calculating Poverty and Inequality using the Lorenz Curve
The FGT class of poverty measures
The Gini Coefficient
Decomposition of changes in poverty
Growth and distribution effects
Intra and Inter sectoral effects
Country case study: Bangladesh
Context
Simulations using SimSIP poverty
7. THE LORENZ CURVE The Lorenz curve maps out the cumulative income distribution as a function of the cumulative population distribution.
L represents the cumulative income distribution, and P the cumulative population distribution.
L(P) represents L% of the income accruing to the bottom P% of the population, where income per capita is ordered from lowest to highest.
8. THE LORENZ CURVE The Lorenz curve can be estimated using group data (e.g. data by decile) :
The General Quadratic (GQ) Lorenz Curve.
The Beta Lorenz Curve.
Data Requirements:
Percentage of the Population by Interval
Mean welfare indicator (i.e. income or expenditure per capita) within interval.
9. CALCULATING POVERTY AND INEQUALITY USING THE LORENZ CURVE FGT CLASS OF POVERTY MEASURES:
(Foster, Greer, and Thorbecke, 1984)
In terms the Welfare Distribution:
In terms the Lorenz Curve :
10. CALCULATING POVERTY AND INEQUALITY USING THE LORENZ CURVE INEQUALITY:
THE GINI COEFFICIENT (G)
G = A / (A + B)
A = 1/2 – B
G = 1 – 2B
where B is the integral of the
Lorenz curve
11. DECOMPOSITION IN CHANGES IN POVERTY
FGT poverty measures have additive properties.
Denoting the poverty measures and population shares of the sub-groups by and we have:
Sector Decomposition (Ravillon and Huppy, 1991)
12. DECOMPOSITION IN CHANGES IN POVERTY
Changes in poverty can be decomposed into growth and inequality effects (Datt and Ravillon, 1992)
13. COUNTRY CASE STUDYBANGLADESH [1991/92 – 2000]
14. SIMULATIONS USING SimSIP POVERTYDATA REQUIREMENTS [ For Time 1 and Time 2]
15. SIMULATIONS USING SimSIP POVERTYRESULTS USING SIMULATOR
16. COUNTRY CASE STUDYRESULTS USING ACTUAL DATA
17. COUNTRY CASE STUDYRESULTS USING ACTUAL DATA
18. SIMULATIONS USING SimSIP POVERTYOTHER RESULTS
19. SimSIP Evaluation The Tool : Still the Lorenz Curve
Calculating Poverty and Inequality using the Lorenz Curve
The FGT class of poverty measures
The Gini Coefficient
Impact of changes in income/consumption sources
Impact on poverty – various statistics
Impact on inequality – Gini Income Elasticity
Country case study: Bangladesh
Context – VGD, VGR, GR, FFE, Secondary stipend
Simulations using SimSIP Evaluation
20. Main transfer programs in Bangladesh Vulnerable Group Feeding (VGF) and Gratuitous Relief (GR) are the main programs used by the government to provide emergency, short-term relief to disaster victims.
Food-for-Work (FFW) and Test Relief (TR) are counter-cyclical workfare programs that provide the rural poor with employment opportunities during the lean seasons.
Vulnerable Group Development (VGD) has evolved from providing relief to increasing self-reliance by tying food transfers to a package of development services – NGOs working in partnership with government provide poor rural women with skill, literacy, and numeric training; credit and savings mobilization; and health and nutrition education.
Food-for-Education (FFE) aims to remove economic barriers to primary school enrollment by the poor (in-kind stipend links monthly food transfers to poor households to primary school enrollment of children)
21. Example of statistics provided: GIE GIE = 1 ? Distributed like income/con sumption
GIE > 1 ? Increase in inequality at the margin
GIE < 1 ? Decrease in in equality at the margin
GIE > 0 ? Positive correlation with income/consumption
GIE = 0 ? No correlation with income/consumption
GIE < 0 ? Negative correlation with income/consumption
Impact on inequality:
Marginal Change in Gini = Income Share * (GIE – 1)
Smallest GIEs indicate most redistributive programs
22. Key results for the GIEs
23. CONCLUSIONS Poverty indicators using group data give a fairly good approximation of reality.
Results using SimSIP give a good overall picture of poverty and inequality trends
Urbanization in Bangladesh contributed to approximately 1.34 percent in poverty reduction.
Poverty is concentrated in rural areas. The incidence is 16 percent higher in rural areas.
The decrease in rural poverty has significantly reduced overall poverty (7.26 percent out of the 9.35 percent reduction in national poverty is due to poverty reduction in rural areas)
Poverty has been reduced during the 90s mainly through growth effects and has been negatively affected by distributional effects
Inequality has increased significantly during the 90s, specially in urban areas and within the manufacturing sector.