100 likes | 201 Views
A Postcolonialist Analysis of the Development Cooperation between the EU and the ACP Countries. B ohao Wang M.A. in Political Science National Taiwan University. Outline of the presentation. I. Postcolonialism II. Cotonou Agreement III. Institutions and Process of Decision-making
E N D
A PostcolonialistAnalysis of the Development Cooperation between the EU and the ACP Countries Bohao Wang M.A. in Political Science National Taiwan University
Outline of the presentation • I. Postcolonialism • II. Cotonou Agreement • III. Institutions and Process of Decision-making • IV. A Postcolonialist Analysis • V. Conclusion
I. Postcolonialism • A. Said (A) representation (B) dichotomy • B. Spivak (A) the subaltern (B) reflexivity Is the EU aware of its own cultural lens when promoting values through its development policies?
II. CotonouAgreement • A. Changes (A) Changes in trade relations (B) Inclusion of the civil society in decision-making process • B. Continuities (A) Basic needs (B) Structural adjustments (C) Good governance (D) Human rights
III. Institutions and Process of Decision-making • A. Council of Ministers • B. European Parliament (A) monitoring (B) Co-decisioning • C. European Commission • D. European External Action Services, EEAS
IV. A PostcolonialistAnalysis • A. Development policies becoming more foreign policies oriented after the Treaty of Lisbon. • B. Cultural implication of the guiding principles (A) basic needs 1. fictional, hierarchical 2. justificaion of the intervention of the expert 3. ignorance of inequality
IV. A Postcolonialist Analysis (B) structural adjustments 1. cultural weights and discursive authority of economics 2. neo-colonialism and bio-politics (C) good governance 1. western donors as judges, deciding what’s good and bad. 2. corruption/ anti-corruption
IV. A Postcolonialist Analysis • (D) human rights 1. universalism vs. cultural relativism 2. both are problematic -cultural relativism: dichotomous, essentialist, -universalism: promotion of universal rights? essentialist 3. universality as a goal not a priori fact
V. Conclusion • Ignorance of the cultural lens • Pretense to neutrality and objectivity VS. • Reflexivity