1 / 23

MnSCU Audit Committee

MnSCU Audit Committee. May 20, 2003. Update on System-level Accountability Framework. May 20, 2003. Activity Since February Board/Leadership Retreat. Task Force Meetings March 6, 2003 March 13, 2003 Addressed Issues Raised at Retreat

gasha
Download Presentation

MnSCU Audit Committee

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MnSCU Audit Committee May 20, 2003

  2. Update on System-level Accountability Framework May 20, 2003

  3. Activity Since February Board/Leadership Retreat • Task Force Meetings • March 6, 2003 • March 13, 2003 • Addressed Issues Raised at Retreat • Developed preliminary measures for 5 Priority Indicators • Referred to IR Directors

  4. Types of Strategic Measures • Core Measures – Basis for setting system targets • Contextual Measures – To improve understanding of core measures • Ideal Measures – Potential future measures subject to development

  5. Measurements: Strategic Plan vs. Work Plan • Strategic Plan Measures • Enduring, long-term targets • Outcome-based (Ends) • Affected by Environmental Factors • Work Plan Measures • Shorter term annual targets • Often activity based • Means to Ends

  6. Strategic Direction IVCommunity & Economic Vitality

  7. Indicator 11: Economic Development • Core Measures • Graduate Employment & Continuing Education • Graduates personal income • Contextual Measures • Anton Study • Ideal Measures • Supply & Demand Measures

  8. Status of Indicator 11 • By June 2003 • Related Employment Rates • Continuing Education Rates • Wage Rates by Level of Degree • Future Data from Department of Economic Security • Contextual Information • Wage Rates by Industry & Geography

  9. Strategic Direction IAccess & Opportunity

  10. Indicator 1: Access to Programs & Courses • Core Measures • MnSCU Overall Participation Rate • MnSCU Underserved Students Participation Rate • Affordability Index • Contextual Measures • MnSCU Market Share • Ideal Measures • Unmet Student Needs

  11. Status of Indicator 1 • Participation Rates • 2000 and earlier available Summer 2003 • 2001 and 2002 census data available Fall 2003 • Drill down by region, race, ethnicity, age, etc • IR Group evaluating 3 national affordability measures for MnSCU use (to provide benchmark data)

  12. Strategic Direction IIIHigh Quality Learning Programs & Services

  13. Indicator 6: Student Learning • Core Measures • Student Pass Rate on Certification or Licensure Exams • Student Success at Transferring Institutions • Contextual Measures • Course Completion Percentages • Ideal Measures • HLC institution’s assessment level • Student satisfaction • Non-graduate goal attainment • Standardized assessments

  14. Status of Indicator 6 • IR Group needs to assemble data on licensure exam pass rates (not currently captured in MnSCU databases) • Transfer data available, but requires analysis and technical specification (3-4 months)

  15. Strategic Direction IIFully Integrate the System

  16. Indicator 3: Fiscal & Physical Capital Utilization • Core Measures • Operating Cost Ratios: Instructional, Academic Support & Administrative • Facilities Condition Index • Technology Index • Contextual Measures • National Peer IPEDS data • National Standards for Facilities Condition • Ideal Measures • Define “Output” for true efficiency measure

  17. Status of Indicator 3 • Financial & Facilities Data is available, requires ratio analysis • Working on Technology Index with Leadership Council Committee • Must Reconsider Whether Other Measures of Efficiency or Shared Services are Desired

  18. Indicator 5: Planning & Resource Alignment • Core Measures • Unnecessary Program Duplication • Course Transfer • Contextual Measures • Implementation of Allocation Model • Ideal Measures • System Cost/Benefit Value • Stakeholder Satisfaction

  19. Status of Indicator 5 • Unnecessary Program Duplication is Undefined • Transfer Data is Available in Data Warehouse, but needs analysis and technical specifications

  20. Accountability Framework:Next Steps • IR Directors Meetings • May 29 • Recommended Measures • June Board Meeting • Further Development Work by IR Group throughout FY 2004

  21. MnSCU Office of Internal Auditing A CATALYST FOR IMPROVEMENT Website: www.internalauditing.mnscu.edu

More Related