100 likes | 238 Views
Planning as pluricentric coordination and collaborative innovation. Karina Sehested, Forest and Landscape, Copenhagen University. Government. Business organisations. EU. Brussels office. KKR. Growth Forum. KKU. Regional Council. Municipalities. Growth House Zealand. Fehmarn Belt
E N D
Planning as pluricentric coordination and collaborative innovation Karina Sehested, Forest and Landscape, Copenhagen University
Government Business organisations EU Brussels office KKR Growth Forum KKU Regional Council Municipalities Growth House Zealand Fehmarn Belt Forum KL Pluricentric planning conditions
Challenges • The complex governance situation • From steering to coordination • From horisontal/vertical coordination to pluricentric coordination • From plan-planning to strategies, projects and innovation
From impossible order to qualified disorder • A complex, unlimited planning process with numerous decision-situations • Not one actor decides direction for others to follow (not one e.g. meta-guvenor) • Coordination as mutual adjustment • Strategies and actors are inter-dependent • Common voluntary coordination
Pluricentric coordination • Making relations and connections between collaborations in practice • Contemporary and flexible coordinations • Interaction and communication • Coordination is political and arena for power conflicts
How to do it? • Strategic choise of relations and points of coordination • Personal participation • Coordination in action – not on paper • Building of coordination ”communities” • Making common interests and interdependency explicit • Handle conflicts and develop friendly disagreements
Collaborative innovation in pluricentric planning situations Collaborative innovation is: • The creation and implementation of new ideas facilitated by interaction and learning processes among politicians, public administrators/planners, other professionals, citizens, interests organisations, business etc.
Context: CLIPS Innovation leadership Barriers and drivers: Cultural Institutional Inter-organizational Organizational Identity related Institutional design of network based innovation Creative learning through collaboration Implementation of new ideas and Knowledge Quality in public services and policies Users Professionals Politicians
Different policy areas • Health • Spatial planning • Education • Crime prevention The publicness of collaborative innovation?
Lack of political priorities Conservative planning cultures and mistrust: ”we know best and we are used to..” Sector divisions and ”silo” behaviour Personal attributes: courage, entrepreneur, openminded Innovative ”spaces” where differences meet Innovation leadership: framing and facilitation Cross sector organising and multidicp. teams Barriers and drivers