300 likes | 324 Views
This research explores the concept of attention and its different processes, including selectivity, division, and multitasking. It discusses the theories of attention and their implications for multitasking. The consequences of divided attention in various applications, such as driving and reading web pages, are also examined.
E N D
Perceptual Processes:Attention & Consciousness Dr. Claudia J. Stanny EXP 4507 Memory & Cognition Spring 2009
What do we mean when we say we are “paying attention?” • Focus on one task to exclusion of others • Selectivity • Inhibition of irrelevant information • Ability to shift attention (disengage from one task and engage with another task) • Maintaining focus • Vigilance – sustained attention to one task • Division of effort across multiple tasks • Multitasking • Allocation of resources to multiple tasks Claudia J. Stanny
Defining Attention • Vigilance (Sustained attention) • Selective Attention (Focus on one task) • Division of Attention (Multitasking) • Attention as processing capacity or mental effort • Controlled Processing (Attentional Processing) • Automatic Processing Claudia J. Stanny
Vigilance • Sustained attention • Example: Radar screen operators • Problems with boredom and distractibility • Lapses • Missed signals • Observers periodically disengage from tasks to monitor the environment • Neurological aspects of periodicities in attention (Aue, Arruda, Kass, & Stanny in review) Claudia J. Stanny
Selective Attention Tasks • Ability to focus attention • Dichotic Listening Task • Shadowing Task • Stroop Task • Selection of one stimulus source, task, or response • Inhibition of other stimulus sources, tasks, or responses Claudia J. Stanny
Selective Attention: Shadowing Tasks • Cocktail Party Phenomenon • Two distinct messages arrive at each ear • Task is to repeat (shadow) the message in one ear Claudia J. Stanny
Selective Attention: Dichotic Listening Tasks • Two sets of digits • Report by time of arrival • Report by location (left ear, right ear) • Relative cost of reporting by location or switching channels to report by time of arrival Claudia J. Stanny
Selective Attention: Dichotic Listening Tasks • Sometimes the cost of switching from one channel to another is less than predicted by an early selection model Claudia J. Stanny
Stroop Task • Stimulus activates competing responses • Color name (generated by reading) • Color name (generated by perception of color) • Two possible task demands: • Read the word • Name the ink color • Must inhibit one response to make the correct response for the task demands Claudia J. Stanny
Demonstration of the Stroop Task Claudia J. Stanny
Divided Attention • Division of attention across multiple tasks • Questions: • To what extent can attention be divided without loss in quality of performance on tasks? • To what extent does practice change our ability to maintain task performance when attention is divided? Claudia J. Stanny
What is the effect of practice?Automatic & Controlled Processing • Schneider & Shiffrin, 1977; Shiffrin & Schneider, 1977 • Controlled Processing • Attentional processing • Sequential, slow, flexible, requires resources • Bottlenecks likely to occur during multi-tasking • Automatic Processing • Distributed processing • Parallel, fast, inflexible, requires few resources • May be able to multi-task automatic processes Claudia J. Stanny
Demonstration of Automatic and Controlled Processing in the Shiffrin & Schneider Task Claudia J. Stanny
Theories of Attention • Bottleneck theories • Resource theories • Feature integration theory Claudia J. Stanny
Bottleneck Theories • Where in the stream of information processing does the bottleneck (selectivity) occur? • Filter Theory (Broadbent, 1958) • Attenuation Theory (Treisman, 1960) • Late Selection Theory (Deutsch & Deutsch, 1963) Claudia J. Stanny
Attention as Processing Resource • Attention as an allocation of capacity or resources for processing information • Kahneman (1973) Attention and Effort • Role of arousal • Effects of practice • Potential for multitasking Claudia J. Stanny
Implications for Multitasking • Development of automaticity can reduce demands on processing resource • Automatic processing can enable the division of attention and multitasking • Possible for simple, highly practiced tasks • Errors appear when one or more tasks become more demanding Claudia J. Stanny
Costs of Automaticity • Costs of rapid switching between tasks • Task analysis : Evaluate the specific demands of each task • Automatic processes are inflexible and lead to errors when situation requires a new response • Example in the Schneider & Shiffrin task: Attentional Capture • Example in the Stroop task: Difficulty in inhibiting rapid but irrelevant responses Claudia J. Stanny
Multitasking Application: Driving while talking on a cell phone Cole, Kass, & Stanny (2007) Claudia J. Stanny
Consequences of Divided Attention:Other Applications • Response times are slower when we are engaged in a cell phone conversation • Distracting effects of advertising on web pages • Web pages with ads take longer to read and comprehend than those without ads • Added effects of animated ads • Memory and understanding of main points in text is worse when textbooks include irrelevant cartoons and side bars to generate interest • Relevant photos, cartoons, and other materials aid learning; irrelevant materials just distract Claudia J. Stanny
Visual Search • Feature present searches • Target identified by a single feature • Rapid, parallel searches (target “pops out”) • Feature absent searches • Target identified by the absence of a single feature • Slow, serial examination of each stimulus • We process positive information (feature present) more rapidly than negative information (feature absent) Claudia J. Stanny
Demonstration:Visual Search Tasks Claudia J. Stanny
Conjunction Searches • Target is a combination of features • Non-targets have only one of the features • Slow, serial search process • Focused attention to a location required to detect integrations of features • When attention is distracted, illusory combinations of features might occur Claudia J. Stanny
Demonstration: Searches involvingFeature Conjunctions Claudia J. Stanny
Feature Integration TheoryTreisman & Gelade (1980) • Distributed attention • Process stimuli in parallel • Processing is distributed across the spatial array • Process dominated by feature detection • Focused attention • Process stimuli serially • Attention is allocated to a specific spatial location to accurately integrate the features for that stimulus Claudia J. Stanny
Neurological Correlates of Attention • Orienting attention network • Parietal lobe; active during visual search tasks & when attending to spatial locations • Visual neglect when this area is damaged • Executive attention network • Frontal lobe; inhibits automatic responses when task produces conflicting responses (e.g., Stroop) • Top-down control of attention • Alerting attention network • Orienting responses to novel stimuli Claudia J. Stanny
Unilateral Neglect • Lesions of posterior parietal lobe • Some role of frontal lobe • Hemineglect • Usually seen with right parietal lesions Claudia J. Stanny
Visual Search in Unilateral Neglect Visual search strategies are biased to one side of the visual field in neglect Severity of neglect is exaggerated with increased visual clutter Husain, M (2008). Scholarpedia, 3(2):3681. Claudia J. Stanny
Attention and Consciousness • Role of subjective awareness • Awareness of products of mental processing • Level of awareness of mental processes themselves • Rapidity of some processes (e.g., retrieval) make them inaccessible to awareness or conscious examination • Role of self-report as valid data about some processes (e.g., problem solving, metamemory, metacognition) Claudia J. Stanny
Disorders of Attention • Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder • Attentional Deficit Disorder • Blindsight • Damage to visual cortex, sub-cortical visual areas intact Claudia J. Stanny