60 likes | 293 Views
Jabber vs. Icq. Psi. &. Petr Kalhous (erebos@kvetakov.no-ip.com) & Ondřej Welsch (koza@kvetakov.no-ip.com). PSI – program for communication very simple effective multilateral (Icq, AIM, …) free for every systems user-friendly
E N D
Jabber vs. Icq Psi & Petr Kalhous (erebos@kvetakov.no-ip.com) & Ondřej Welsch (koza@kvetakov.no-ip.com)
PSI – program for communication • very simple • effective • multilateral (Icq, AIM, …) • free • for every systems • user-friendly • appearance in many ways Petr Kalhous (erebos@kvetakov.no-ip.com) & Ondřej Welsch (koza@kvetakov.no-ip.com)
Psi – for example a few previews PSI 0.10-Pedrito – my skin PSI v.0.9.3 default Petr Kalhous (erebos@kvetakov.no-ip.com) & Ondřej Welsch (koza@kvetakov.no-ip.com)
Icq protocol vs Jabber protocol Jabber is free for everyone Many activ window XML is economical for datagood for mobiles No advertisement!!! Every known protocolswith used transports Icq is one server Only one activ window Difficult to data transfer Very commercial Only icq vs. Petr Kalhous (erebos@kvetakov.no-ip.com) & Ondřej Welsch (koza@kvetakov.no-ip.com)
For example a few servers in CZ • Servers in CZ: • njs.netlab.cz ( czech rep. ) • kvetakov.no-ip.com ( our private ) • jabbim.cz ..... xxUSERxx@server.cz Petr Kalhous (erebos@kvetakov.no-ip.com) & Ondřej Welsch (koza@kvetakov.no-ip.com)