130 likes | 266 Views
The Paralympic legacy: what will it do for people with intellectual disabilities?. Prof. Jan Burns (Canterbury Christ Church University). INAS - the International Federation for sport for para-athletes with an intellectual disability www.inas.org. Special Olympics. INAS. Paralympics.
E N D
The Paralympic legacy: what will it do for people with intellectual disabilities? • Prof. Jan Burns (Canterbury Christ Church University)
INAS - the International Federation for sport for para-athletes with an intellectual disability www.inas.org
Special Olympics INAS Paralympics
Paralympics 20 million+ viewing public
The Legacy Aspiration for London 2012: “influence the attitudes and perceptions of people to change the way they think about disabled people” Department for Culture, Media and Sport, 2010 p.3
The Legacy • A large claim • However, the organisers do not set out the pathway to this outcome • Explanations may lie in research on attitude change
Previous research • A large quantity of previous research using social psychological theories of attitude change • Factors implicated include: • Increasing positive contact with the target group • Increasing legitimate positive knowledge about the target group London 2012 a massive social intervention
A study investigating the legagcy claim Joanna Ferrara (Canterbury Christ Church University) Prof. Jan Burns (Canterbury Christ Church University) Dr Hayley Mills (Canterbury Christ Church University Aim: to investigate whether it is possible to change attitudes towards people with ID by exposure to paralympic performance.
DESIGN Intervention Time 1 Time 2 N= 97 3 Measures + demographic questionnaire N= 97 3 Measures + demographic questionnaire N= 62 3 Measures + debrief Paralympic footage + Information Experimental N= 52 3 Measures + debrief Comparison
Results • Groups were comparable on all measures and demographics • Significant positive improvement in implicit attitudes between T1 and T2, irrespective of group • Total explicit attitude change scores not significant, but subscale ‘empowerment’ was, again irrespective of group • Regression T 1 – main predictors of positive attitude, previous contact and gender, not social desirability • Regression T 2 – no significant predictors
Conclusions and implications • Tentative support that watching Paralympics might improve attitudes, but equally so will watching the Olympics • This may be a result of such stimuli evoking feelings of ‘empowerment’ • Even quite a small intervention can have an effect, the Olympics/Paralympics is a very large intervention • Do not know a) how long these effects last, b) how generalisable the results are
Thank you Questions? Support our athletes in London 2012