320 likes | 448 Views
Kaunas CECA Parterns Meeting. WP2: Report 29 th June 2006. Dr Ing Jonathan C. Borg. Presentation Outline. Introduction to WP2 Survey Approach Survey Analysis Conclusions. WP2 MAIN Objectives.
E N D
Kaunas CECA Parterns Meeting WP2: Report 29th June 2006 Dr Ing Jonathan C. Borg
Presentation Outline • Introduction to WP2 • Survey Approach • Survey Analysis • Conclusions
WP2 MAIN Objectives • To optimally define and select the instruments/methods (eg e-Learning vs face-to-face vs combination) to prepare and deliver the ECDL CAD training material; • To identify and select suitable ECDL CAD candidate testing methods.
Presentation Outline • Introduction • Survey Approach • Survey Analysis • Conclusions
Survey Approach To effectively achieve the above main objectives of this WP, as agreed in the Bucharest (March 2006) kick-off meeting, a relevant questionnaire was drafted by the leading partner P5 (Malta) and the circulated for feedback to all CECA partners.
Survey Following feedback by the partners, the final version was approved by the coordinator and re-distributed amongst all partners for sample surveys with relevant CAD stakeholders in their region.
Presentation Outline • Introduction • Survey Approach • Survey Analysis • Conclusions
Survey Participants (1) Replies By Country
Survey Participants (2) Replies By Gender
Survey Participants (3) Age By Country
Survey Participants (4) Age Overall:
Survey Participants (5) Educational Status By Country
Survey Participants (6) Educational Status Overall:
Survey Participants (7) Experience in Technical Drawing By Country Years
Survey Participants (8) Experience in Technical Drawing Overall:
Quest. 6: Would you Be Willing to obtain ECDL Certification in the next 3 years ? By Country
Quest. 6: Would you Be Willing to obtain ECDL Certification in the next 3 years ? By Gender
Quest. 6: Would you Be Willing to obtain ECDL Certification in the next 3 years ? Overall:
Quest. 7 Assuming that a good e-learning course for an ECDL CAD is developed, would you be willing using it? By Country
Quest. 7 Assuming that a good e-learning course for an ECDL CAD is developed, would you be willing using it? By Gender
Quest. 7 Assuming that a good e-learning course for an ECDL CAD is developed, would you be willing using it? Overall
Quest. 8 For an e-learning ECDL CAD course, HOW would you like to have training organized? By Country Approach 1: One topic explained -> demo Approach 2: One topic explained -> exercise Approach 3: All topics explained -> complex drawing
Quest. 8 For an e-learning ECDL CAD course, HOW would you like to have training organized? By Gender Approach 1: One topic explained -> demo Approach 2: One topic explained -> exercise Approach 3: All topics explained -> complex drawing
Quest. 8 For an e-learning ECDL CAD course, HOW would you like to have training organized? Overall Approach 1: One topic explained -> demo Approach 2: One topic explained -> exercise Approach 3: All topics explained -> complex drawing
Quest. 9 Do you need a paper-based training manual too? By Country
Quest. 9 Do you need a paper-based training manual too? By Gender
Quest. 9 Do you need a paper-based training manual too? Overall
Quest. 10 Would you prefer to have the ECDL test as in (a) or (b)? By Country (a) Completely remote and on-line (b) At an approved testing centre
Quest. 10 Would you prefer to have the ECDL test as in (a) or (b)? (a) Completely remote and on-line By Gender (b) At an approved testing centre
Quest. 10 Would you prefer to have the ECDL test as in (a) or (b)? (a) Completely remote and on-line Overall (b) At an approved testing centre
Presentation Outline • Introduction • Survey Approach • Survey Analysis • Conclusions
Conclusions • Sample sufficiently mixed to have a good representation of the target audience; • Results give good indication of training approach to adopt; • Results clearly indicate preferred mode of testing.