1 / 19

WHO European Centre for Environment and Health

WHO European Centre for Environment and Health. TASK FORCE INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT MODELLING (Twenty-eight session, Haarlem, 7-9 May 2003 ). Recent WHO Findings on Health Risks Introduction Projects Key findings Follow-up. Jürgen Schneider Project Manger WHO ECEH, Bonn, Germany.

genica
Download Presentation

WHO European Centre for Environment and Health

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. WHO European Centre for Environment and Health TASK FORCE INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT MODELLING (Twenty-eight session, Haarlem, 7-9 May 2003) • Recent WHO Findings on Health Risks • Introduction • Projects • Key findings • Follow-up Jürgen Schneider Project Manger WHO ECEH, Bonn, Germany

  2. WHO European Centre for Environment and Health WHO Air Quality and Health • Methodology of health impact assessment (participation in AIRNET & APHEIS) • Systematic Review of Health Aspects of Air Quality in Europe (focus on ‘priority pollutants’ PM and ozone, NO2) • Update of WHO Air Quality Guidelines • Health impacts of transport-related air pollution • Health risks of POPs from LRTAP • AQ strategies for NIS • Capacity building in air quality monitoring and assessment (NIS & ALB)

  3. WHO European Centre for Environment and Health WHO Project Systematic Review of Health Aspects of Air Quality in Europe (2002-2004) Purpose: To provide the EC DG Environment (& CAFE) with a systematic,periodic, scientifically independent review of the health aspects of air quality in Europe. Scientific Advisory Committee (SAC) Guides the overall review WHO Working Group (SAC + invited experts) Up-date the scientific evidence on health aspects of air pollution, agree on answers

  4. WHO European Centre for Environment and Health Systematic Review • Health aspects of PM, NO2 and ozone • Focused on twelve questions received from the CAFE Steering Group • Used state-of-the-art knowledge on epidemiology and toxicology • Short answers, supported by more extensive justifiactions • Extensively reviewed • Presented to stakeholders in Brussels • Now available on web: • http://www.euro.who.int/document/e79097.pdf

  5. WHO European Centre for Environment and Health Systematic Review • 1) Is there new scientific evidence to justify reconsideration of the current WHO Guidelines for the pollutant? • Particulate matter: Yes • Association of PM exposure with health effects have been strengthened • Fine PM (measured as PM2.5) strongly associated with mortality and other endpoints • PM10 is still considered to be a relevant metrics • BS should be re-evaluated • Ozone: Yes • Evidence from epidemiological studies on effects of short-term exposure to ozone (mortality and morbidity) • Evidence of long-term effects on lung function • Nitrogen dioxide: No • Very limited new evidence on potential mechanisms of NO2 effects • Reiteration of important role of NO2 as indicator for traffic related air pollution and precursor of both ozone and secondary PM

  6. WHO European Centre for Environment and Health Systematic Review • 2 )   Which effects can be expected of long-term exposure? • PM • Long-term exposure may lead to a marked reduction in life expectancy. Increases in lower respiratory symptoms and reduced lung function in children, COPD and reduced lung function in adults • Ozone • Reduced lung functions in children • NO2 • Some evidence for decreased lung function and increase of risk of respiratory syndroms

  7. WHO European Centre for Environment and Health Systematic Review • 3)   Is there a threshold below which no effects on health are expected to occur in all people? • For all three pollutants: No • The population distribution of susceptibility may be such that effects are expected at very low levels • Thresholds differ depending on endpoint selected • Increasingly sensitive epidemiological study designs have identified adverse effects of air pollution at increasingly lower levels •  Replacing the threshold concept with a more complete concept using exposure risk functionsshould be considered

  8. WHO European Centre for Environment and Health Systematic Review • 4)   Are the effects dependent on the subject’s characteristics? • PM • Elderly and those with pre-existing disease are at higher risk • Socially disadvantaged and poorly educated are at higher risk for mortality • Ozone • Mortality and hospital admissions increase with age • Effects on asthmatic children might be greater • Larger effects in children which spend more time outdoor • Nitrogen dioxide

  9. WHO European Centre for Environment and Health Systematic Review 6)   Is the considered pollutant per se responsible for effects on health? PM: Yes – even though no single causative agent can be identified Ozone: Yes Nitrogen dioxide: A clear answer can not be given

  10. WHO European Centre for Environment and Health Systematic Review • 7)   For PM: which of the physical and chemical characteristics of particulate air pollution are responsible for health effects? • Fine PM is more hazardous than larger particles • Metal content • Organic components such as PAH • Endotoxins • Extremely small particles (< 100 nm)

  11. WHO European Centre for Environment and Health Systematic Review • 10)  Which are the critical sources of the pollutant? • Motor vehicle emissions • Other combustion processes • Wind-blown dust of crustal origin: less critical

  12. WHO European Centre for Environment and Health Systematic Review • 12)  What averaging period is most relevant from the point of view of protecting human health? • Particulate matter: • Short-term (24 hours) and long-term (annual) guidelines are recommended • Ozone: • Short-term: 8-hour average is appropriate • Long-term: associations are not clear enough to allow specific recommendation • Nitrogen dioxide: • Both, short-term (1 h) and long-term are warranted

  13. WHO European Centre for Environment and Health Systematic Review • Follow-up: Meta-analysis to derive concentration-response functions for • Particualte matter • Mortality (cause-specific) • Hospital admissions (cause-specific) • Ozone • Mortality (cause-specific) • Hospital admissions (cause-specific) • Symtom exacerbation in astmatics • Nitrogen dioxide • The working group did not recommend the use of regression coefficients for NO2 from regression models to assess the effect of NO2 by itself.

  14. WHO European Centre for Environment and Health Systematic Review • Second round of questions by CAFE Steering Group • Relevance of peak exposure? • Uncertainties • Specific populations at risk? • Why should we keep the annual AQG for NO2? • Other polluants relevant?

  15. WHO European Centre for Environment and Health Update WHO AQG • WHO AQG published in 2000, but work finalised in 1996 • Systematic review recommended an update for PM and ozone • Update a world-wide activity • Process initiated; request for funding • Finalise until end of 2004

  16. WHO European Centre for Environment and Health Joint UN/ECE WHO Task Force on Health • 6. Meeting 22-23 May in Bonn • Approaches to risk assessment • Modelling and assessment of health impacts of particulate matter and ozone from long range transboundary air pollution • Relevance of secondary inorganic aerosols for PM-related health effects • Is the AOT60 approach still appropriate? • Possible approaches to include effects on morbidity into IAM

  17. WHO European Centre for Environment and Health CAFE WG on PM • PM is a priority pollutant of CAFE -> WG on PM • Revision of Position Paper on PM • Attainability of current LV (stage I and II) • Guidance on targets for CAFE/IAM, based on advice from WHO, but also other considerations like attainability, cost-effectivness, etc. • Draft version of the revised position paper will be discussed at a stakeholder conference in October 2003

  18. WHO European Centre for Environment and Health Health impacts of transport-related air pollution • Objective • The objective of the WHO workshop is to provide a systematic literature review on transport-related health hazards. • Time schedule • ·15th July, submission of papers • ·1st September, the draft monograph for external review • ·Mid October 2003 - WHO WG Workshop in WHO Bonn Office • End 2003 - finalizing the monograph • Contents • Factors Determining Emissions in the European Regions • Contribution of Traffic to Ambient Air Pollution Levels in the European Region • Human Exposure to Transport Related Air Pollution and Dose • Epidemiological Studies on Transport Related Health Effects • Toxicological Studies on Transport-Related Health Effects • Assessment of Health Hazards of Transport-Related Air Pollution

  19. WHO European Centre for Environment and Health TASK FORCE INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT MODELLING (Twenty-eight session, Haarlem, 7-9 May 2003) Any Questions?

More Related