1 / 60

Studies and Research Committee 1:45 – 2:45 March 16, 2012 Center B4-W

K-5/6 Reading Practices Inventory for Selected Illinois School Districts: Preliminary Results, Research Insights, and Audience Discussion. Studies and Research Committee 1:45 – 2:45 March 16, 2012 Center B4-W Katie Ludes Boomer Crotty Pamela Godt Karen Walker

geona
Download Presentation

Studies and Research Committee 1:45 – 2:45 March 16, 2012 Center B4-W

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. K-5/6 Reading Practices Inventory for Selected Illinois School Districts: Preliminary Results, Research Insights, and Audience Discussion Studies and Research Committee 1:45 – 2:45 March 16, 2012 Center B4-W Katie Ludes Boomer Crotty Pamela Godt Karen Walker Elizabeth Goldsmith-Conley

  2. Special Acknowledgment Data analysis, charts, and graphs done by George Fero School of Education McKendree University gjfero@mckendree.edu

  3. Handouts • Directions for getting to Wiki page to view results • Request to participate form • Evaluation form

  4. Agenda • Introductions • Goals • Survey Questions • Preliminary Results • Research Insights • Wiki Page • Audience Suggestions • Evaluation

  5. Goals • Compile a statewide inventory of reading programs • Make the results available to school districts and the public. • Help districts in researching programs • Help districts in planning staff development • Help colleges of education in preparing pre-service teachers for what they will meet in their schools • Help educational researchers • Help professional staff developers, among others. • Additional comments from audience

  6. GMS (GibsonCity Melvin Sibley) PBL (Paxton Buckley Loda) Zion Kendall Champaign Fisher Heritage Ludlow Mahomet-Seymour Monticello Rantoul St. Joseph Thomasboro Tolono Urbana Lee Cook Grundy Livingston Galesburg Vermillion Shiloh Hancock Blue Ridge Neoga Arcola Villa Grove East Richland Sullivan

  7. Participating Districts 2011and 2012 Arcola CUSD #306 Blue Ridge CUSD #18 Champaign CUSD #4 East Richland CUSD #1 Fisher CUSD #1 Galesburg CUSD #205 Gibson City-Melvin-Sibley CUSD #5 Heritage CUSD #8 Ludlow CUSD #142 Mahomet-Seymour CUSD #3 Confidential #1 Monticello CUSD #25 Neoga CUSD #3 Paxton Buckley Loda CUD #2 Rantoul City SD #137 St. Joseph Community CCSD #130

  8. Shiloh CUSD #1 Sullivan CUSD #300 Thomasboro CCSD #130 Tolono CUSD #7 Urbana SD # 116 Villa Grove CUSD #302 Zion School ESD #6 Coal City Unit District 1 Gifford CCSD 188 Oak Park District 97 Prairieview Ogden Newark Community CCD#6 Steger School District 194 Lansing SD 158 Georgetown-Ridge Farm CUD4 Tri-Point CUSD 6 Dixon USD 170 Homewood

  9. People Who Filled Out the Survey • 1 Retired Teacher • 1 Social Worker • 2 Spec. Ed Prog Directors • 1 Special Ed Teacher • 1 Title I Aide • 1 Title I Teacher • 3 Teachers • 2 Asst. Superintendents • 4 Cur. Coordinators • 2 Curriculum Directors • 1 Learning Specialist • 7 Principals • 2 Superintendents • 6 Reading Specialists

  10. 2011 and Illinois Comparison

  11. 2012 and Illinois Comparison

  12. Total and Illinois Comparison

  13. Demographics for Both Years

  14. Assessments Used2011 and 2012 • AIMS/CBM • CORE • DIBELS • DRA • DRP • Gates Mac Ginitie • Gray Oral Reading • ISEl • PRO-ED • QRI • Running Records • TPRI • Woodcock Johnson • Woodcock Reading Mastery

  15. Assessments 2011 23 districts

  16. 2012 Assessments (11 districts)

  17. 2012 Assessments (11 districts)

  18. 2012 Assessments

  19. 2012 Assessments 11 districts

  20. Combined Assessments (34 districts)2011 and 2012

  21. Combined Assessments of 34 districts2011 and 2012

  22. Combined Assessments of 34 districts2011 and 2012

  23. Combined Assessments2011-2012

  24. Observations about Assessments • AIMS Web overtaking DIBELS

  25. Core Programs Used in 34 Districts2011 and 2012 • Anywhere Learning System • Autoskill • Land of the Letter People • Let’s Read with the Letter People • McMillan/McGraw Hill • Open Court SRA/McGraw Hill • Read Well/Sopris West • Reading Mastery Plus • Rigby Literacy • Scott Foresman • Success for All • The Nation’s Choice • Trophies • Wright Group

  26. District Use of Core Programs 2011 and 2012

  27. District Use of Core Programs2011 and 2012

  28. District Use of Core Programs 2011 and 2012

  29. Observations about programs used as core 4 programs used most frequently as core • McMillan/McGraw Hill, • Scott Foresman, • Rigby, • Trophies Is there a problem here?

  30. Interventions2011-2012 • Adding Additional Time • Bringing Words to Life • Earobic • Great Leaps • Jolly Phonics • Lexia • Michael Heggerty’s Phonemic Awareness • Paths to Achieving Literacy Success • Peer Assisted Learning Strategies (PALS) • Quick Reads • Read 180 • Read Naturally • Reading A to Z • Reading Mastery • Reading Recovery • Road to the Code • Six Minute Solution • SLANT system • Soliloquy Software • Spire/Orton Gillingham • Wilson

  31. Interventions by Grade Level2011 and 2012

  32. Interventions by Grade Level2011 and 2012

  33. Interventions by Grade Level2010-2011

  34. Intervention by Grade Level2011-2012

More Related