110 likes | 272 Views
The Bree Collaborative’s Role in Spine/Low Back Pain Care: A Proposal. Presentation to the Bree Collaborative August 2, 2012. Purpose of Presentation .
E N D
The BreeCollaborative’s Role in Spine/Low Back Pain Care:A Proposal Presentation to the Bree Collaborative August 2, 2012
Purpose of Presentation • Present proposed approach for Bree’s role in Spine care/Low Back Pain topic -where Bree can add value, improve outcomes, and reduce costs • Discuss and adopt general approach
Experts met July 2nd Invited Participants • Gary Franklin, MD, L&I • Leah Hole-Curry, L&I • Vickie Kolios-Morris, Spine SCOAP, FHCQ • Mary Kay O’Neill, MD, Cigna • John Robinson, MD, First Choice Health • Terry Rogers, MD, FHCQ Invited guest • Rick Deyo, MD, OHSU Staff: Steve Hill & Rachel Quinn
Low Back Pain is common, costly, and complex • One of the most common reasons for patients to see physicians • Leading cause of work-related disability and workers’ compensation for people under age 45 • Medical costs are in excess of $25 billion per year; commercially, musculoskeletal top expenditure • There’s a huge psycho/social element to low back pain - one of the strongest predictors of onset of low back pain and transition from acute to chronic is patient’s emotional status and presence of work-life issues
Variation in Treatment and Management among Patients with Acute and Chronic Back Pain Acute/Subacute(symptoms lasting less than 12 weeks) • Unnecessary use of imaging and surgery without improved outcomes • Patients seen by wide variety of practitioners with different treatment approaches • Most acute & subacute low back pain patients could be managed and screened in outpatient primary care setting Chronic(symptoms lasting more than 12 weeks) • Huge variability in lumbar fusion surgeries, and they are very expensive
Bree and History of Spine Care Presentations/discussons to date, at 3 Bree Collaborative meetings, have focused on lumbar spinal fusions – treatment for chronic, not acute back pain • September 30, 2011 • January 30, 2012 • March 29, 2012
Bree Topic Goals & Guidelines • Goal: • Improve quality, outcomes for patients and cost-effectiveness • Topic Selection • Significant safety, efficacy or cost-effectiveness concerns • Substantial variation in practice patterns or high utilization trends can be indicators of poor quality and potential waste in the health care system, without producing better care outcomes • Outcome: • Identify topics with variation or quality concerns, and recommend evidence-based strategies to improve quality and cost-effectiveness Yes, both acute and chronic spine care fit criteria
Low Back Pain Initiatives in WA UW Comparative Effectiveness Research Pilot on lumbar fusions and spine care in general ACUTE (< 6 weeks) CHRONIC ( > 3 months) Spine SCOAP compiles data on all spine surgeries
Recommendations • Create a spine subgroup • Initial focus of spine workgroup: how to appropriately manage patients with acute low back pain, and prevent transition of acute/subacute to chronic low back pain • Gather evidence-based guidelines, emerging best practices & data on how to appropriately manage acute • St. Joseph’s, Virginia Mason Medical Center • Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI) • Evidence-based business practices (Intel/Oregon program) • Centers of Occupational Health & Education (COHE) • Gather education of alternatives (shared decision aids) • How to support/align with existing efforts, whether focus is acute or chronic (e.g., comparative effectiveness registry)
Recommendation: Spine Subgroup • Members of exploratory group • Gary Franklin • Mary Kay O’Neill • John Robinson • Subgroup recommendations • Bob Moots, associate director for chiropractics, L&I • A spine surgeon • Others?
Recommendation: Registry Subgroup to consider the following recommendation: • All hospitals and ASCs (that perform discectomy, fusion, and/or disc replacement) participate in a publicly reported, prospective, benchmarking registry of spine surgical and interventional procedures • Participation in such a registry will generate needed information about the appropriateness of surgical/intervention spine care that can be used to support future HTA and payer decisions related to spine care. • The registry should focus its public reporting on progress in reducing variation in the use of less indicated procedures, as well as in improving the quality, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of care.