1 / 9

TDR Measurement of MCP Anode

TDR Measurement of MCP Anode. Camden Ertley. Index. TDR Setup Method Results 16 pixels tied together 9 pixels tied together 4 pixels tied together 1 pixel Conclusion. TDR Setup.

georgejsmith
Download Presentation

TDR Measurement of MCP Anode

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. TDR Measurement of MCP Anode Camden Ertley

  2. Index • TDR Setup • Method • Results • 16 pixels tied together • 9 pixels tied together • 4 pixels tied together • 1 pixel • Conclusion

  3. TDR Setup The fast edge, ~280ps rise time, produced by the scope was used. The signal was split with a SMA T. One T output was connected to the Ch 1 input the other went to the MCP. The cables used were 2.5ns rg58 coax with SMA ends. Scope Channel 1 Input Fast Edge -0.14 to +3V 1kHz MCP Output Fast Edge from Scope 100mV and 500ps per div

  4. Method • TDR: • Connected in manner shown on setup slide • Measured pulse height and fall time for each number of pixels • Calculated C using 67% of fall time (one time constant). Assumed to be single pole.

  5. 16 Pixels Tied Together • TDR • Assuming infinitely fast rise time pulse used. • Fall time: 329.1 ps • C = 6.582 pF • Actual rise time of pulse used subtracted from measured. • Fall time: 141.1 ps • C = 2.822 pF • LCR meter. • Measured = 55.62 pF • Cable = 50.3 pF • C = 5.32 pF • MCP Pulse • Rise Time • 480 ps • Amplitude • 144.8 mV 50mV and 500ps per div 20mV and 500ps per div

  6. 9 Pixels Tied Together • TDR • Assuming infinitely fast rise time pulse used. • Fall time: 304.1 ps • C = 6.082 pF • Actual rise time of pulse used subtracted from measured.. • Fall time: 116.1 ps • C = 2.322 pF • LCR meter. • Measured = 53.8 pF • Cable = 50.3 pF • C = 3.5 pF • MCP Pulse • Rise Time • 478.0 ps • Amplitude • 117.8 mV 50mV and 500ps per div 20mV and 500ps per div

  7. 4 Pixels Tied Together • TDR • Assuming infinitely fast rise time pulse used. • Fall time: 260.8 ps • C = 5.216 pF • Actual rise time of pulse used subtracted from measured. • Fall time: 72.8 ps • C = 1.456 pF • LCR meter. • Measured = 51.8 pF • Cable = 50.3 pF • C = 1.5 pF • MCP Pulse • Rise Time • 477.4 ps • Amplitude • 79.88 mV 50mV and 500ps per div 20mV and 500ps per div

  8. 1 Pixel • TDR • Assuming infinitely fast rise time pulse used. • Fall time: 249.2 ps • C = 4.984 pF • Actual rise time of pulse used subtracted from measured. • Fall time: 61.2 ps • C = 1.224 pF • LCR meter. • Measured = 53 pF • Cable = 50.3 pF • C = 2.7 pF • MCP Pulse • Rise Time • 420.4 ps • Amplitude • 59.46 mV 50mV and 500ps per div 20mV and 500ps per div

  9. Conclusion • LCR meter • Different cables were used on each measurement (we didn’t want to remove and reattach them) • TDR • Seems to show a contribution of ~0.1 pF for each pixel added.

More Related