1 / 6

TDR of Insertable B-layer

TDR of Insertable B-layer. ATLAS CB, October 8 th 2010 G. Darbo / INFN - Genova Indico agenda page: http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=80458. IBL Project – Main Steps. 2008: Pixel B-layer taskforce: restore and improve tracking and b-tagging performance

maxine-dyer
Download Presentation

TDR of Insertable B-layer

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. TDR of Insertable B-layer ATLAS CB, October 8th 2010 G. Darbo / INFN - Genova Indico agenda page: http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=80458

  2. IBL Project – Main Steps • 2008: Pixel B-layer taskforce: restore and improve tracking and b-tagging performance • Active for 6 months – report to the Bern ATLAS week  IBL concept • 2009: The IBL project sees the birth • Endorsement of IBL PL and TC (CB 20.02.2010) • IBL organization in place (management structure endorsed by EB 3.04.2010) • 8th of July: IBL kick-off meeting • ATLAS Institutes interested in the project invited (email to CB 28.04.2009) • 31 Institutes represented, 35÷40 Institutes shown interest. • 2009-10: The IBL project grows • Prototyping and design advance fast – progress followed in the IBL Community: • 4 General Meetings – several activity weekly meetings • Presented to ATLAS community • AW 2/2009, AW 7/2009, AW 10/2009, AW 2/2010, AW 7/2010, AW 10/2010 • 2010: The IBL project is consolidated (43 Institutions, 303 people committed) • Interim-MoU  collecting last signatures • TDR ready for approval!

  3. IBL Technical Design Report Editorial team: M. Capeans (technical editor), G. Darbo, K. Einsweiller, M. Elsing, T. Flick, M. Garcia-Sciveres, C. Gemme, H. Pernegger, O. Rohne and R. Vuillermet. ReviewersA. Andreazza, A. Catinaccio, A. Clark, N. Hessey, A. Lankford, M. Nessi, L. Rossi, S. Stapnes, G. Viehhauser, P. Wells and N. Wermes • ATLAS TDR includes: • Overview and motivation for the project • Study of the physics performance – Task Force (6/2010), led by M.Elsing, shows that IBL is crucial to recover the needed tracking and b-tagging capability  at 2x1034. • Technical description of the project with baseline and options for critical issues • Beam-pipe, extraction/insertion, installation • Organization of the project and resources • TDR versions: • 22.07.2010 – TDR editors first meeting • 17.03.2010 – 1st internal draft selected readers • 21.07.2010 – 2nd internal draft reviewers • 16.08.2010 – TDR incomplete draft IBL community and USG – deadline for comments 1.09.2010 • 07.09.2010 – TDR complete draft EB, IBL, USG • 15.09.2010 – Final draft for approval sent to CB • CERN-LHCC-2010-13, ATLAS TDR 19

  4. Spare material

  5. Interim-MoU - Institutions • There are 43 institutions in the IBL project • Large interest for the sensor (22 Institutions) • Full effort and funding requirements are covered • 303 people have expressed their interest to contribute to the project • many have already started to work. • In most cases institutes contribute with money where also there is contribution with manpower. • Status: Funding Agencies involved are sending their signed copies. The dead-line was end of August and we are waiting for the last ones to send them in.

  6. History of IBL Project - Time Line • 1998: Pixel TDR • B-layer designed to be substituted every 3 years of nominal LHC (300 fb-1): due to then available radiation hard sensor and electronic technologies. • 2002: B-layer replacement • became part of ATLAS planning and was put into the M&O budget to RRB. • 2008: B-layer taskforce • B-layer replacement cannot be done – Engineering changes to fulfil delayed on-detector electronics (FE-I3, MCC) made it impossible even in a long shut down. • Best (only viable) solution: “make a new smaller radius B-layer insertion using technology being developed for HL-LHC prototypes”. This became the IBL. • 2009: ATLAS started IBL project: • February: ATLAS CB endorses IBL PL and TC • April: IBL organization in place (Endorsed by the ATLAS EB) • 2010: TDR and interim-MoU • TDR is under approval in ATLAS • Interim-MoU is collecting last signatures.

More Related