280 likes | 453 Views
Privatized Cigarette Enterprises and Public Health. By Ayda A. Yurekli, Ph.D World Bank. Meeting of Mediterranean Countries, Malta, September 2001. The Objectives. To examine the privatization of cigarette enterprises from public health perspective
E N D
Privatized Cigarette Enterprises and Public Health By Ayda A. Yurekli, Ph.D World Bank Meeting of Mediterranean Countries, Malta, September 2001
The Objectives • To examine the privatization of cigarette enterprises from public health perspective • Why were state-enterprises established, why privatize • What are the expected benefits of privatization • Why these benefits may undermine Public Health • Are Public Health concerns valid? • Do private enterprises operate efficiently? • Do they have higher productivity? • Do production and consumption increase? • Does privatization reduce the consumer price? • To discuss the Pros and Cons of Privatization
Reasons for State Enterprises • increase government revenues and control prices • insufficient or lack of private investment • control economy and be self reliant; • protect national security.
Why Privatize State Enterprises? • Became burden on the government budget and slowed down economic growth. • Overstaffed • Paid excessive wages and benefits to employees • Lacked autonomy and poor incentives to managers • Operated inefficiently and unproductively • Had old and inefficient technology • Higher corruption and • Produced low quality products • Emerging Capital Markets (i) Increasing private and foreign investment
Structural Reforms • To reinforce macroeconomic policies • To promote efficiency • To reduce macroeconomic imbalances • Privatization • Reform tax system and administration • Financial and trade liberalization
Sectoral Distribution of Privatization by Region, 1988-1993 Source : Sader 1995, LAC : Latin America, ECA, East and Central Asia, EAP : East Asia and Pacific, SA : South Asia; Africa : Sub-Saharan Africa, MENA: North America and Middle East
Private Investment in Cigarette Production in Ukraine and Turkey, 1990s Source: USDA, World Tobacco Files, Kravosky, 2000
Expected Benefits and Outcome of Privatization EXPECTED BENEFITS LEADS TO EXPECTED OUTCOME Efficiency and Productivity Lower Prices Higher Quality More Variety • Increased • - Consumption • - Users • - Accessibility • - Affordability
How does Privatization of Cigarette Enterprises affect Public Health ? EXPECTED OUTCOME TO PUBLIC HEALTH • Increased • - Consumption • - Users • - Accessibility • - Affordability • Increasing deaths and disease • Increasing health care costs • Increasing burden on • smokers • non-smokers • families • society • economy
Do Private Enterprises Operate Efficiently?Higher Labor Productivity
Do Private Enterprises Operate Efficiently?Higher Labor Productivity
Increasing Labor Productivity: What consequences for employment ? TBT:Food Beverages and Tobacco Manufacturing: Source: Kasnakoglu, Cakmak 2000, Onder 2001
Labor Adjustment:Post Privatization,State Cigarette Enterprises in Ukraine
Privatization and Production:Is production higher after privatization?
Privatization and Production:Is production higher after privatization?
Operating Environment:Monopolistic Competition: Follow the leader Private Production
Why doesn’t an efficiency gain reduce prices?Price Control: Below Market Rate Prices
How can prices be lower than costs? Subsidies • TEKEL has been incurring loses and owes USD 100 million to international tobacco enterprises. • TEKEL receives high subsidies from the government budget.
Impact of SubsidiesWho gains, who loses? • Government finances its subsidies from government tax revenues and also internal and external borrowing. • Government subsidies create a substantial burden on government budget in Turkey • Government increases prices of state enterprise products to finance loss-making enterprises. • As a result, consumers face higher prices. In the long run, consumers and society lose.
Will consumer prices decrease after privatization?Depends on pre-privatization environment. • If the industry is heavily subsidized- NO • If the government controls the price with soft budget- NO • If the current prices are below the market rate- NO
Pros and Cons of Privatization Pros • Increases foreign investment • Increases government revenues • Funds can be reallocated to other good uses • No conflict of interest for government (increasing cigarette production and reducing demand) • In the short run, price may increase • Products meet consumer’s taste and demand Cons • Reduced employment (maybe) • Lower salaries and benefits (maybe) • Worse working conditions • Aggressive marketing, promotion may raise consumption
Solution:Negative effects ofprivatization on public health minimized if : • Regulatory tobacco control framework is set to protect consumers • Government controls tobacco epidemic through tax policies • No pre-tax adjustment discussion with the private enterprises