1 / 11

Digital Storytelling and Literary Analysis: Teaching with the Common Core State Standards

Digital Storytelling and Literary Analysis: Teaching with the Common Core State Standards. Dr. Ellen Maddin Northern Kentucky University. What we know . . . The process of researching, planning and producing a digital story:

gerald
Download Presentation

Digital Storytelling and Literary Analysis: Teaching with the Common Core State Standards

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Digital Storytelling and Literary Analysis: Teaching with the Common Core State Standards Dr. Ellen Maddin Northern Kentucky University

  2. What we know . . . The process of researching, planning and producing a digital story: • Encourages reflection (Jenkins &Lonsdale, 2007; Genereux & Thompson, 2008; Sandars & Murray, 2009) • Improves reading and writing (Gregory & Steelman, 2008; Kajder, 2004; Sylvester & Greenidge, 2010) • Increases understanding of content (Sadik, 2008) • Facilitates critical thinking (Borneman & Gibson, 2011) • Helps learners to construct meaning (Rossiter & Garcia, 2010)

  3. ELA Common Core

  4. ELA Common Core

  5. References Beach, R., Hull, G. & O’Brien, D. (2010). Transforming English language arts in a Web 2.0 world. In D. Lapp. & D. Fisher (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (pp. 161-167). New York, NY: Routledge. Borneman, D. & Gibson, K. (2011). Digital storytelling: Meeting standards across the curriculum in a WWII holocaust unit. School library monthly, 27(7), 16-18. Brown, D. & Warshauer, M. (2006). Students’ experiences in learning to integrate technology into instruction. Journal of technology and teacher education, 14(3), 599-621. Common core state standards initiative (2010). Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/ Czarnecki, K. (2009). Digital storytelling in practice: Storytelling in context. Library technology reports, 45(7), 5-8. Davis, F., Bagozzi, R. & Warshaw, P. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, 35(8), 982-1003. Genereux, A. & Thompson, W. (2008). Lights, camera, reflection! Digital movies: A tool for reflective learning. Journal of college science teaching, 37(6), 21-25. Gregory, K. & Steelman, J. (2008). Cresting the digital divide. Community college journal of research and practice, 32, 880-882.

  6. References Jenkins, M. & Lonsdale, J. (2007). Evaluating the effectiveness of digital storytelling for student reflection. Proceedings from ascilite Singapore 2007, ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Johnson, L., Adams, S., & Haywood, K. (2011). The NMC horizon report: 2011 K-12 edition. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium. Kajder, S. (2004). Enter here: Personal narrative and digital storytelling. The English journal, 93(3), 64-68. Kiraz, E. & Ozdemir, D. (2006). The relationship between educational ideologies and technology acceptance in pre-service teachers. Educational technology & society, 9(2), 152-165. Koch, A., Heo, M. & Kush, J. (2012). Technology integration into pre-service teacher training. International journal of information and communication technology education, 8(1), 1-14. Legal music for videos (n.d.). Creative commons website. Retrieved from http://creativecommons.org/legalmusicforvideos Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of educational computing research, 32(2), 131-152. Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers college record, 108(6), 1017-1054.

  7. References Partnership for 21st century skills website (n.d.). Retrieved from http://p21.org/ Pitler, H., Hubbell, E., Kuhn, M. & Malenoski, K. (2007). Using technology with classroom instruction that works. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Robin, B. (2008). Digital storytelling: A Powerful technology tool for the 21st century classroom. In Theory into practice (pp. 220-228). Columbus, OH: The College of Education and Human Ecology, The Ohio State University. Robin, B. (2011). The educational uses of digital storytelling website. Retrieved from http://digitalstorytelling.coe.uh.edu Rossiter, M. &Garcia, P. (2010). Digital storytelling: A new player on the narrative field. Special Issue: Narrative perspectives on adult education. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 126, 37-48 Sadik, A. (2008). Digital storytelling: A meaningful technology-integrated approach for engaged student learning. Educational technology research and development, 56(4), 487-506.

  8. References Sandars, J. &Murray, C. (2009). Digital storytelling for reflection in undergraduate medical education: A pilot study. Education for primary care, 20, 441-444. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational researcher, 15(2), 4-14. Sylvester, R. & Greenidge, W. (2009). Digital storytelling: Extending the potential for struggling writers. The reading teacher, 63(4), 284-295. Teo, T. (2009). Modeling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computers in education, 52(2), 302-312.

More Related