280 likes | 412 Views
At the end of this session, you should be: . More aware of the source of OR/IR questionsDistinguish researchable and unresearchable implementation problemsKnow the criteria of a good OR/IR questionAssess whether your research question is a good OR/IR questionFinalize the research question which
E N D
1. Where do Operational/Implementation Research questions come from? Soumya Swaminathan, MD
Tuberculosis Research Centre
Chennai, India
2. At the end of this session, you should be: More aware of the source of OR/IR questions
Distinguish researchable and unresearchable implementation problems
Know the criteria of a good OR/IR question
Assess whether your research question is a good OR/IR question
Finalize the research question which will be developed during the workshop
3. Link between Program Manager and Researcher OR is distinguished from other types of research by its focus on factors under the control of managers
Successful OR requires close collaboration between researchers and managers.
OR results should be immediately applicable to program problems.
Need to think about inputs or interventions and outcomes – causal chain.
4. An ideal team… The manager’s role in OR is as, if not more important than, the role of the researcher
The manager identifies the program problem to be researched, sets the research parameters, and is responsible for utilization of results
The researcher is responsible for the integrity of the study
Collaboration between managers and researchers is essential during all phases of the study
5. What is a Problem? OR begins with a problem to be solved
A program problem is a discrepancy between actual and desired results
Not all problems mean something is wrong with the program. Some problems are opportunities, e.g.,
“What is the best way to increase the size of this program to serve more people?”
6. Steps in analyzing the problem Clarify the viewpoints of all concerned and stakeholders
List the problem
Think of all the reasons why this could be so
Example: Increasing defaulter Rate of TB patients
Poor health services management?
Social stigma with TB
Negative attitudes of health workers towards TB patients?
7. Steps in analyzing the problem 2. Specify and describe the core problem
Quantify the problem
Describe it more elaborately
Increasing defaulter Rate of TB patients
How widespread is the observation? Which regions persistently? New areas which may be potential low compliant areas?
Who is affected the most
How severe is it – what are the consequences, e.g. increasing morbidity, deaths, waste of resources, development of multi-drug resistance?
8. Steps in analyzing the problem 3. Identify the factors that may have contributed to the problem, clarify the relationships between the problem and contributing factors
Increasing defaulter Rate of TB patients
Staff who are poorly trained because there are inadequate materials on TB health educations have little understanding of patients prescriptions and do not provide systematic advice and counselling to patients which results in patient not understanding treatment requirements and therefore a high default rate
9. Causal Chain – what is the model for expected change?
10. Thinking about the Solution or Intervention • Where do solutions come from?
Program staff /Staff of other programs
Clients
Policies
Literature review
Researchers
• Characteristics of a good solution:
Under control of manager
Has potential to make large improvement
Effects can be measured
Easy to implement
- Affordable/sustainable
11. Identification of possible OR/IR questions Description of the health situation and , interventions – both in place and potential
magnitude of the problem
Distribution of health needs of the population
Risk factors for some problems
People's awareness of the problem
Utilization patterns of services
Cost-effectiveness of available and potential other interventions
This information is required to formulate adequate policies, adapt or plan an intervention
12. Identification of possible IR questions 2. Information required to evaluate on-going interventions or access progress …..the need for making adjustments in the intervention
coverage of priority health needs
Coverage of target groups
Acceptability of the services
Quality of services
Cost-effectiveness of the intervention
Impact of the programme on health
This information is required to assess progress and the need for adjustments
13. Identification of possible IR questions Analysis of possible causes for missed targets in order to find solutions
Availability
Acceptability
Affordability
Service delivery problems
14. Where do you get all this information? Local documentation – project progress report, theses, dissertations, seminar proceedings
Programme progress or evaluation reports
Medical literature including reviews which outline gaps in research
Scientific meetings and conferences
New ideas from previous research
Funding agencies annual reports
Questions asked by programme staff and even students
Personal experience and observation
15. Is the Problem Researchable? Is there a discrepancy between actual and desired results?
Do I need research to solve the problem ?
Do I have enough time, money and qualified research staff ?
In Operations Research the manager intervenes in inputs and processes to solve problems
16. What is a Researchable Problem? Non-Research
– A discrepancy exists between desired and observed situation
– We know why the discrepancy exists
– We know the best solution
Research
A discrepancy exists between desired and observed situation
We do not know why the discrepancy exists
Different solutions exist but we do not know the best one
17. An OR/IR Question is a Program Problem Restated as a Question If I charge 1 dollar for a pap smear, will fewer women get pap smears?
Will training community health workers increase vaccination coverage?
Will a mass media campaign attract more women to deliver in hospitals?
Can “loss to follow up” for early infant diagnosis be improved by using sms?
18. Do all problem situations require research? Problem situation: In District Y, (population 145,000) sanitary conditions are poor (5% of households have toilets) and diseases connected with poor sanitation such as hepatitis, gastroenteritis and worms are very common.
The Department of Health has initiated a sanitary project that aims at increasing the percentage of households with toilets by 15% every year. The project provides materials and the population should provide labour.
Two years later, less than half of the target was reached.
19. Do all problem situations require research? What is the discrepancy?
What factors can explain this difference
Service related factors? Failure to inform and involve the community? Bottleneck in the supply of materials? Training and effectiveness of sanitary inspectors?
Population related factors? Lack of understanding of relationship between disease and sanitation? Poverty?
Physical factors? Ecosystems? Hard soil? Area always flooded?
20. Criteria for Prioritizing IR questions Relevance
How large or widespread is the problem
Who is affected
How severe is the problem? Potential for spread if not checked?
Who considers this a problem?
Burden to the health system? Economic impact on the population
Avoidance of duplication
Researched before? If yes, are there any major questions that deserve further research? Is my context so different that I cannot use results of previous research?
21. Criteria for Prioritizing IR questions 3. Timeliness (urgency of need for data)
How urgently are the results needed by the policy makers, implementers and healthcare providers to change course, take on new interventions or stop what they are doing?
4. Political Acceptability
Advisable to do IR of high interest and support of local/national authorities
Increased likelihood for study results to be implemented
Involvement of policy makers in the study
22. Criteria for Prioritizing IR questions 5. Feasibility
Complexity of the research
Adequate resources to do the study
Is it feasible to conduct and report the findings in 12 to 36 months
6. Applicability of possible results or recommendations
Likelihood of adoption of recommendations
How would the findings be used to improve health and healthcare?
Availability of resources for implementing the recommendations
23. Criteria for Prioritizing IR questions 7. Ethical acceptability
How acceptable is the research to those who will be studied? Is the problem shared by the target group?
Can informed consent be obtained from the research subjects
Will the condition of the subjects be taken into account
Will the results be shared with those who are being studied? Beneficial
24. Practice Stating an OR/IR Question Make a problem statement using the format:
Will (increasing, decreasing, changing) this (input or process) improve (output, outcome or impact)?
25. Exercise Men in district Y have high levels of HIV.
Condom use is also low.
– Is this an OR problem?
– Give two possible solutions
26. Main message OR/IR research questions should address the needs of the policy makers, programme managers and healthcare providers, not just satisfy the curiosity of academicians
OR/IR questions should be identified through an analysis of the situation and evidence, not merely based on the "gut feeling" of the policy makers, programme managers or healthcare providers
27. Identify the OR Question We are having a cholera outbreak!
Adolescents are having sex!
What are ANC coverage rates in this population
Will decreasing the frequency of supervision improve efficiency without reducing service quality?