510 likes | 926 Views
Return on Investment in NREPP Youth Substance Abuse Prevention Programs. Ted R Miller, PhD, PIRE. COST EFFECTIVENESS. Walk thru BCA of a typical program BCAs for NREPP programs BCAs for DWI & Crime Prevention Programs. Cost-Benefit Analysis of School-based SA Prevention Programs.
E N D
Return on Investment in NREPP Youth Substance Abuse Prevention Programs Ted R Miller, PhD, PIRE
Walk thru BCA of a typical program • BCAs for NREPP programs • BCAs for DWI & Crime Prevention Programs
Cost-Benefit Analysis of School-based SA Prevention Programs • Looked at a typical school-based program • % of youth 12-14 who delay start-up due to the program • Prevention delays start of substance use by 2 years on average • # youth delaying use • % reduction in substance use
Total cost savings = Cost of use x % reduced • Divide the cost saving benefits by program cost • State & local government savings
2 Lit Reviews: Mean of Technically Sound Non-Zero Effectiveness Estimates
What Costs Result from Using? • Illness/Poisoning • Violent Crime • Property Crime • Public Order/Supply Crimes * • Impaired Driving • Other Injury * * Not costed for tobacco
What Costs Result from Using? MONETARY COSTS • Medical • Work Loss • Other Resources (Property Damage/Police) • Quality of Life – Controversial to Put a $ Value On
Total Savings from Universal School-based SA Prevention in 2002, Ages 12-14 (B=Billions of $)
Program Cost/Pupil • $220 average across 11 programs • Includes training of teachers • Teacher salaries, fringe, & overhead • Program materials
Effectiveness vs Cost-Effectiveness • % reduction in DWI deaths measures effectiveness • BCR also considers cost • The most effective interventions sometimes have lower returns on investment (measured by BCRs)
BCRs for School-Based Pgms (D=drugs M=marijuana T=tobacco V=violence)
Lower Return on Investment • Project TND (Toward No Drugs) 0%, D • STARS for families 8% binge • Original DARE (not on NREPP) did not work
BCRs for Youth Development Programs (with costs & benefits computed comparably)
CASAstart costs more than it saves • Across Ages – razor-thin savings • Project PATHE (not on NREPP) does not work
Lack Costs for Indicated Programs • Use community referrals extensively • How much use of those services results • What does it cost
BCRs for Other Environmental Interventions (costs & benefits computed comparably)
21 Minimum Drinking Age • Reduces youth DWI deaths • Reduces youth suicides • Raises age of initiation which lowers the risk of alcoholism in adulthood • Reduces % of youth who drink • Reduces % of youth who binge • Reduces sales & profits
Other Interventions ? • Community mobilization & capacity building: advocacy to change laws, enforcement & norms • Adults work with youth to improve outcomes • Peer-to-peer • Media: social norms • Billboard campaign • Web education/social networking
Underage Drinking Prevention • Aggressively enforce underage sales laws • Improve age-checking technology • Reduce outlet density • Social host policies that hold adults liable when kids drink at home parties
College Drinking Prevention • Restrict pitchers & schooners • Discourage happy hours • Ban all-you-can-drink hours
Do not create the wrong story: 3 Soundbites, 2 dozen variants, work your way back – or the 10 seconds they use may not be on your story • A press conference is not live; if you mis-speak, say it over • Beware silence • Rule of 3s • Rhyme, alliteration • Passion • Paint pictures • T-shirts
Plan how/when to release • People do not understand big numbers • You cannot spend some savings • Select costs to suit the audience • White on blue slides; large type size • Minimize words on slides • Do not read every # • Put a face with the $
Free PIRE Technical Assistance Monique Sheppard & Ted Miller Children's Safety Network Economics & Data Resource Center Enforcement of Underage Drinking Laws TA & Training Center CSAP State Epidemiological Workgroup TA 301-755-2728 sheppard@pire.org
Prevention Approaches Can Impact Broadly or Narrowly • Thinning Alcohol Outlet Density or Raising Alcohol Taxes changes alcohol consumption & thus reduces all alcohol-related problems • Creating Defensible Space (thru lighting, gating, etc.) only reduces violence • Evaluations often do not assess some impacts, notably for midnight driving curfew, 0-tolerance, .08
Some violence prevention measures will impact multiple problems. Others will not.
Impaired Driving Measures • No one intervention will reduce impaired driving deaths by more than 17% • We need to select a package of complementary measures
What Happens If We Implement Multiple Measures • Implementing one broad measure can have a large effect on the BCR for another because each reduces a % of the remaining problem
When combine targeted & broad measures • Large impact on a narrowly targeted segment of the problem • Minimal effectiveness reduction in the BCR for the broad-based intervention
Rules for a Sensible DWI Package • Broader measures like regional trauma systems, 20% ETOH tax, occupant restraint, & graduated licensing lose little effectiveness as targeted DWI measures are implemented • Measures tightly targeting subgroups only modestly reduce the pool of injuries/effectiveness of all-driver DWI measures
Multi-Problem Behaviour Is the Norm • Some Interventions Should Affect Multiple Problems • Spillover Benefits Of • DWI on Other Harm • Non-DWI on DWI • Non-ETOH Measures on ETOH
Which General DWI Measures Impact Consumption or Harm? • .08 maximum driver BAC • Server training • Enforcing Laws vs Serving Intoxicated Patrons (SIP Laws) • Intensive Breath Testing • Could force drinking to the home, adding domestic violence, etc.
Which "Youth" DWI Measures Impact Consumption or Harm? • 21 Minimum Legal Drinking Age • 0 ETOH Tolerance f/Drivers < 21 • ETOH Tax Increase • Enforcing Underage Sales Laws • Graduated Licensing w/Curfew
Which Hardcore DWI Measures Impact Consumption or Harm? • Jail • Mandatory offender treatment • House arrest (positive or negative effect: domestic violence ??)
Conclusions • Some NREPP programs are better than others • Some NREPP programs should only be used in special circumstances • Often one must trade off the largest impact vs the largest return per $ spent