130 likes | 384 Views
CHA-CHIP Reports Wichita, November 28 , 2012. Gianfranco Pezzino Senior Fellow and Strategy Team Leader Kansas Health Institute. Report Requirements: Content. See cross walk document All CHA-CHIP requirements must be documented in report, e.g.: Model and process adopted Partnerships
E N D
CHA-CHIP ReportsWichita, November 28, 2012 Gianfranco Pezzino Senior Fellow and Strategy Team Leader Kansas Health Institute
Report Requirements: Content • See cross walk document • All CHA-CHIP requirements must be documented in report, e.g.: • Model and process adopted • Partnerships • Data sources • Health measures + social determinants • Disparities • Priority setting criteria • Implementation and marketing strategies • Measurable health outcomes in CHIP
One Report or Two? • No clear guidance • Pros and cons
Recommended Sectionsof a CHA-CHIP Report • Background • Describe community • Methods • Results (“profile”) • Strengths, challenges, P.H. issue statements • Planned actions (CHIP) • Planned follow-up and implementation monitoring
Public Health Issue Statements • Useful to explain in simple, neutral terms P.H. issues • Contains: • Statement of main issue • Statement of contributing factors (“due to…”)
Example of P.H. Issue Statement - 1 • “Unintentional injuries due to unsafe practices in recreational sports activities”
Example of P.H. Issue Statement – 2 • “Irresponsible sex practices leading to too many teen pregnancies” • “High rate of teen pregnancies due to unsafe sex practices”
More on Communication Plan • Sara Green, Communication Specialist
Hands-on Time • Review as a team the two reports at your table • Focus on format and organization of report
Discussion Points (15 minutes) • What are the PHAB and hospitals requirements that are addressed by each report? • What are the PHAB and hospitals requirements that are NOT addressed by each report? • What are strengths and weaknesses of each report? TO BE CONTINUED AT ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSIONS
Next Steps • Was the format of one centralized learning collaborative program effective? Should we use it again? • Was the format of involving regional teams effective? Should we use it again? • Was the duration of the LC (3 sessions) and of each session adequate? • What topics for face to face peer to peer sessions would you like to address? • What other forms of TA would you like the project to provide? • Are you willing to provide TA to peers in other LHDs? If so, would you requires reimbursement for that?
Kansas Health Institute Information for policy makers. Health for Kansans.