1 / 31

Search for Rare Decays of the B S Meson at the Tevatron

Search for Rare Decays of the B S Meson at the Tevatron. Ralf Bernhard University of Zurich Moriond QCD 19 th March 2006. Outline. Introduction Tevatron CDF & DØ Detector Search for the Decay B s → μ + μ - Search for the Decay B s →  μ + μ - Summary & Conclusions.

gin
Download Presentation

Search for Rare Decays of the B S Meson at the Tevatron

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Search for Rare Decays of the BS Meson at the Tevatron Ralf Bernhard University of Zurich Moriond QCD 19th March 2006

  2. Outline • Introduction • Tevatron • CDF & DØ Detector • Search for the Decay Bs→μ+μ- • Search for the Decay Bs→ μ+μ- • Summary & Conclusions

  3. Tevatron performance • excellent performance of Tevatron in 2005 and early 2006 • machine delivered more than 1500 pb-1 up to now !! • recorded (DØ/CDF) • 1.2/1.4 fb-1 • record luminosity of 1.71032 cm-2/s in January 2006 • high data taking efficiency ~85% • current dataset reconstructed and under analysis • ~1000 pb-1 • compare with ~100 pb-1 Run I

  4. CDF detector • Silicon Tracker SVX • up to |h|<2.0 • SVX fast r- readout for trigger • Drift Chamber • 96 layers in ||<1 • particle ID with dE/dx • r- readout for trigger • tracking immersed in Solenoid 1.4T • Time of Flight • →particle ID

  5. DØ detector • 2T Solenoid • hermetic forward & central muon detectors • excellent coverage ||<2 • Fiber Tracker • 8 double layers • Silicon Detector • up to |h|<2.5

  6. B production at the Tevatron e.g., integrated cross sections for |y|<1: (B+, pT  6 GeV/c)~4 mb • bb cross section orders of magnitude larger than at B-factories (4S) or Z • σ(pp → bb) = 150μb at 2TeV • σ(e+e-→ Z → bb) = 7nb • σ(e+e- → Υ(4S) → bb) = 1nb • all kinds of b hadrons produced: • Bd, Bs, Bc, B**, b, b, … • However: • QCD background overwhelming, b-hadrons hidden in 103 larger background • events complicated, efficient trigger and reliable tracking necessary • crucial for B physics program: • good vertexing & tracking • triggers w/ large bandwidth, strong background rejection • muon system w/ good coverage Lots going on in Si detector

  7. Triggers for B physics • “classical” triggers: • robust and quiet di-muon and single-muon triggers • working horse for masses, lifetimes, rare decays etc. • keys to B physics program at DØ • “advanced” triggers using silicon vertex detectors • exploit long lifetime of heavy quarks • displaced track + leptons for semileptonic modes • two-track trigger (CDF) – all hadronic mode • two oppositely charged tracks with impact parameter Decay length Lxy pT(B)5 GeV Lxy450 mm

  8. Purely leptonic B decay • B->l+ l- decay is helicity suppressed FCNC • SM: BR(Bs->m+m-) ~ 3.410-9 • depends only on one SM operator in effective Hamiltonian, hadronic uncertainties small • Bd relative to Bs suppressed by |Vtd/Vts|2 ~ 0.04 if no additional sources of flavor violation • reaching SM sensitivity: present limit for Bs -> m+m- comes closest to SM value Current published limits: SM expectations:

  9. Purely leptonic B decay Two-Higgs Doublet models: • excellent probe for many new physics models • particularly sensitive to models w/ extended Higgs sector • BR grows ~tan6b in MSSM • 2HDM models ~ tan4b • mSUGRA: BR enhancement correlated with shift of (g-2)m • also, testing ground for • minimal SO(10) GUT models • Rp violating models, contributions at tree level • (neutralino) dark matter … Rp violating:

  10. Experimental search • CDF: • 364 pb-1 di-muon triggered data • two separate search channels • central/central muons • central/forward muons • extract Bs and Bd limit • DØ: • 240 pb-1 (update 300 pb-1) di-muon triggered data • Sensitivity for 1fb-1 of recorded data • both experiments: • blind analysis to avoid experimenter’s bias • side bands for background determination • use B+ -> J/ K+ as normalization mode • J/ -> m+m- cancels m+m- selection efficiencies blinded signal region: DØ: 5.160 < mmm < 5.520 GeV/c2; ±2 wide, =90 MeV CDF: 5.169 < mmm < 5.469 GeV/c2; covering Bd and Bs; =25 MeV

  11. Pre-selection • Pre-selection DØ: • 4.5 < mmm < 7.0 GeV/c2 • muon quality cuts • pT(m)>2.5 GeV/c • |h(m)| < 2 • pT(Bs cand.)>5.0 GeV/c • good vertex • Pre-Selection CDF: • 4.669 < mmm < 5.969 GeV/c2 • muon quality cuts • pT(m)>2.0 (2.2) GeV/c CMU (CMX) • pT(Bs cand.)>4.0 GeV/c • |h(Bs)| < 1 • good vertex • 3D displacement L3D between primary and secondary vertex • (L3D)<150 mm • proper decay length 0 < l < 0.3 cm e.g. DØ: about 38k events after pre-selection • Potential sources of background: • continuum mm Drell-Yan • sequential semi-leptonic b->c->s decays • double semi-leptonic bb-> mmX • b/c->mx+fake • fake + fake

  12. Optimization I • DØ: • optimize cuts on three discriminating variables • angle between m+m- and decay length vector (pointing consistency) • transverse decay length significance (Bs has lifetime): Lxy/σ(Lxy) • isolation in cone around Bs candidate • Random Grid Search • maximize e/(1.+B)

  13. Optimization II • CDF: discriminating variables • pointing angle between m+m- and decay length vector • isolation in cone around Bs candidate • proper decay length probability p(l) = exp(- l/ lBs) • construct likelihood ratio to optimize on “expected upper limit”

  14. Unblinding the signal region • CDF: • central/central: observe 0, expect 0.81 ± 0.12 • Central/forward: observe 0, expect 0.66 ± 0.13 • DØ (300 pb-1): • observe 4, expect 4.3 ± 1.2 CDF

  15. DØ Sensitivity 1fb-1 • Obtain a sensitivity (w/o unblinding) w/o changing the analysis • Combine “old” Limit with obtained sensitivity Used now in addition! Used in previous analysis Cut Values changed only slightly! Expect 2.2 ± 0.7 background events

  16. Normalization • relative normalization is done to B+ -> J/ K+ • advantages: • m+m- selection efficiency same • high statistics • BR well known • disadvantages: • fragmentation b->Bu vs. b-> Bs • DØ: apply same values of discriminating cuts on this mode • CDF: no likelihood cut on this mode

  17. Master equation • R = BR(Bd)/BR(Bs) is small due to |Vtd/Vts|^2 • eB+ /eBs relative efficiency of normalization to signal channel • eBd /eBs relative efficiency for Bd-> m+ m- versus Bs-> m+ m- events in Bs search channel (for CDF~0, for DØ ~0.95) • fs/fu fragmentation ratio (in case of Bs limit) - use world average with 15% uncertainty

  18. The present (individual) limits • DØ mass resolution is not sufficient to separate Bs from Bd. Assume no Bd contribution (conservative) • CDF sets separate limits on Bs & Bd channels • all limits below are 95% C.L. Bayesian incl. sys. error, DØ also quotes FC limit Bd limit x2 better than published Babar limit w/ 111 fb-1 updates on limits/sensitivities expected soon

  19. Tevatron limit combination I • correlated uncertainties: • BR of B± -> J/(->mm) K± • fragmentation ratio b->Bs/b->Bu,d • quote also an average expected upper limit and single event sensitivity • fragmentation ratio b->Bs/b->Bu,d • standard PDG value as default • Tevatron only fragmentation (from CDF) improves limit by 15% • uncorrelated uncertainties: • uncertainty on eff. ratio • uncertainty on background hep-ex/0508058 DØ has larger acceptance due to better h coverage, CDF has greater sensitivity due to lower background expectations

  20. Combination II Example: SO(10) symmetry breaking model • combined CDF & DØ limit: • BR(Bs-> m+ m- ) < 1.2 (1.5) × 10-7 @ 90% (95%) C.L. • world-best limit, only factor 35 away from SM • important to constrain models of new physics at tan • e.g. mSO(10) model is severely constraint R. Dermisek et al. hep-ph/0507233 Contours of constant Br(Bsμ+μ-)

  21. Future Prospects for Bs-> m+m- • assuming unchanged analysis techniques and reconstruction and trigger efficiencies are unaffected with increasing luminosity • for 8fb-1/experiment an exclusion at 90%C.L. down to 210-8 is possible • both experiments pursue further improvements in their analysis

  22. Search for Bs -> m+m- • long-term goal: investigate b -> s l+ l- FCNC transitions in Bs meson • exclusive decay: Bs -> m+m- • SM prediction: • short distance BR: ~1.6×10-6 • about 30% uncertainty due to B-> form factor • 2HDM: enhancement possible, depending on parameters for tanb and MH+ • presently only one published limit • CDF Run I: 6.7×10-5 @ 95% C.L.

  23. Search for Bs -> m+m- Dilepton mass spectrum in b -> s l l decay • DØ: 300 pb-1 of dimuon data • normalize to resonant decay Bs -> J/y f • cut on mass region 0.5 < M(mm) < 4.4 GeV/c2 excluding J/y & y’ • two good muons, pt > 2.5 GeV/c • two additional oppositely charged tracks pt>0.5 GeV/c for f • f candidate in mass range 1.008 < M(f) < 1.032 GeV/c2 • good vertex • pt(Bs cand.) > 5 GeV/c • non-resonant decay: cut out J/ and ’ J/y y’

  24. Search for Bs -> m+m- • blind analysis: optimization with following variables in random grid search • Pointing angle • Decay length significance • Isolation • Background modeled from sidebands • Use resonant decay Bs -> J/y f with same cuts as normalization • Gaussian fit with quadratic background: 73 ± 10 ± 4 Bs-> J/y f resonant decays

  25. Limit on Bs ->  m+ m- • expected background from sidebands: 1.6 ± 0.4 events • observe zero events in signal region BR(Bs -> f m+m-)/BR(Bs -> J/y f) < 4.4 × 10-3 @ 95% C.L. Using central value for BR(Bs -> J/y f) = 9.3×10-4 PDG2004: BR(Bs -> f m+m-) < 4.1×10-6 @ 95% C.L. x10 improvement w.r.t previous limit

  26. Conclusions • CDF & DØ provide world best limits on purely leptonic decays Bd,s -> m+m-, limit important to constrain new physics • with more statistics to come enhance exclusion power/discovery potential for new physics • improved DØ limit on exclusive Bs -> m+m- decay shown, about 2x above SM • Tevatron is doubling statistics every year - stay tuned for many more exciting results on B physics

  27. SPARE

  28. FCNC & new physics • flavor-changing neutral current processes • in SM forbidden at tree level • at higher order occur through box- and penguin diagrams • sensitive to virtual particles in loop, thus can discern new physics • GIM-suppression for down-type quarks relaxed due to large top mass • observable SM rates lead to tight constraints of new physics • corresponding charm decays are less scrutinized and largely unexplored • smaller BRs, more suppressed by GIM-mechanism, long-distance effects also dominating • nevertheless large window to observe new physics beyond SM exists: Rp-violating models, little Higgs models w/ up-like vector quark etc.

  29. Systematic uncertainties • systematics for DØ (CDF very similar) • efficiency ratio determined from MC with checks in data on trigger/tracking etc. • large uncertainty due to fragmentation ratio • background uncertainty from interpolating fit

  30. expected limitBs -> m+m- • expected limit at 95% C.L. for Bs -> m+m-

  31. Constraining dark matter • mSUGRA model: strong correlation between BR(Bs->m+m-) with neutralino dark matter cross section especially for large tanb • constrain neutralino cross section with less than, within and greater than 2 of WMAP relic density universal Higgs mass parameters non-universal Higgs mass Parameters, dHu=1, dHd=-1 S. Baek et al., JHEP 0502 (2005) 067

More Related