Kurt W. Fisher Review Committee Chair Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy

1. Review Committee for the Large Liquid Argon Detector for Neutrino Physics (MicroBooNE) Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory September 19-20, 2013 Kurt W. Fisher Review Committee Chair Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy http://www.science.doe.gov/opa/

2. DOE Review ofMicroBooNE OFFICE OFSCIENCE DOE EXECUTIVE SESSION AGENDA Thursday, September 19, 2013—Wilson Hall, Comitium 8:00 a.m. DOE Executive Session K. Fisher 8:10 a.m. Program PerspectiveT. Lavine 8:20 a.m. Federal Project Director PerspectiveP. Philp 8:40 a.m. Questions 8:45 a.m. Adjourn Project and Review Documents may be accessed at: MicroBooNE Project review documentation webpage UserID: reviewer Password: ureview

3. Review Committee

4. Department of Energy OFFICE OFSCIENCE Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy Office of the Secretary Dr. Ernest J. Moniz Secretary Daniel B. Poneman, Deputy Secretary* Inspector General Loans Program Office Chief of Staff Office of the Under Secretary for Science Vacant Under Secretary for Science Office of the Under Secretary for Nuclear Security Neile L. Miller (Acting) Under Secretary for Nuclear Security Office of the Under Secretary Vacant Under Secretary Assistant Secretary for Policy and International Affairs U.S. Energy Information Administration Assistant Secretary for Congressional and Intergovernmental Affairs Bonneville Power Administration General Counsel Southwestern Power Administration Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management Office of Science Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Chief Financial Officer Southeastern Power Administration Legacy Management Advanced Scientific Computing Research Assistant Secretary for Fossil Energy Deputy Administrator for Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Deputy Administrator for Defense Programs Chief Human Capital Officer Western Area Power Administration Basic Energy Sciences Assistant Secretary for Electrical Delivery and Energy Reliability Deputy Administrator for Naval Reactors Deputy Under Secretary for Counter-terrorism & Counter-proliferation Economic Impact & Diversity Biological and Environmental Research Assistant Secretary for Nuclear Energy Associate Administrator for Defense Nuclear Security Associate Administrator for Emergency Operations Chief Information Officer Management Fusion Energy Science Indian Energy Policy and Programs Associate Administrator for External Affairs Associate Administrator for Infrastructure & Operations Intelligence & Counterintelligence Health Safety and Security High Energy Physics Associate Administrator for Management & Budget Associate Administrator For Acquisition & Project Management Public Affairs Hearings and Appeals Nuclear Physics Associate Administrator for Safety & Health Workforce Development For Teachers/Scientists 21 May 2013 Associate Administrator for Information Management & Chief Information Officer *The Deputy Secretary also serves as the Chief Operating Officer. Office of General Counsel

5. Office of Science OFFICE OFSCIENCE Office of the Director (SC-1) Patricia M. Dehmer (A) Deputy Director for Field Operations (SC-3) Joseph McBrearty Deputy Director for Science Programs (SC-2) Patricia M. Dehmer Deputy Director for Resource Management (SC-4) Jeffrey Salmon Office of Lab Policy & Evaluat. (SC-32) D. Streit Workforce Development for Teachers/ Scientists (SC-27) P. Dehmer Ames SO Cynthia Baebler Advanced Scientific Comp. Research (SC-21) Barbara Helland (A) Chicago Office Roxanne Purucker Office of Budget (SC-41) Kathleen Klausing Office of Business Policy & Ops (SC-45) V. Kountouris Argonne SO Joanna Livengood Basic Energy Sciences (SC-22) Harriet Kung Office of Grants/ Cont. Support (SC-43) Linda Shariati Berkeley SO Aundra Richards Office of Safety, Security & Infra. (SC-31) D. Streit (A) SC Integrated Support Center Brookhaven SO Frank Crescenzo Office of Project Assessment (SC-28) Daniel Lehman SC Communications & Public Affairs (SC-47) DollineHatchett Biological & Environ. Research (SC-23) Sharlene Weatherwax Office of SC Program Direction (SC-46) Daniel Division Fermi SO Michael Weis Fusion Energy Sciences (SC-24) Edmund Synakowski Oak Ridge Office Larry Kelly Office of Scientific and Tech. Info. (SC-44) Walt Warnick Human Resources & Admin. (SC-48) Cynthia Mays Oak Ridge SO Johnny Moore Small Business Innovation Research (SC-29) Manny Oliver Princeton SO Maria Dikeakos High Energy Physics (SC-25) James Siegrist Pacific NWest SO Roger Snyder Nuclear Physics (SC-26) Timothy Hallman Stanford SO Paul Golan (A) Acting Thomas Jeff. SO Joe Arango 4/2013

6. Charge Questions Is the Estimate to Complete updated and credible? Has the risk analysis been updated to accurately reflect the risks that remain in completing the project? Are there any significant risks that jeopardize CD-4 completion and require high-level management attention?

7. Agenda

8. Agenda (cont.)

9. Report Outline/ Writing Assignments

10. Closeout Presentationand Final ReportProcedures

11. Format:Closeout Presentation OFFICE OFSCIENCE • (PowerPoint; No Smaller than 18 pt Font) • 2.1 Use Section Number/Title corresponding to writing assignment list. • List Review Subcommittee Members • List Assigned Charge Questions and Review Committee Answers • 2.1.1 Findings • In bullet form, include an assessment of technical, cost, schedule, and management. • 2.1.2 Comments • In bullet form, list descriptive material assessing the findings and the conclusions based on the findings. This is narrative material and is often omitted as a separate heading and the narrative included either under Findings or Recommendations as appropriate. This heading carries more emphasis than the Findings, but does not require an action as do the Recommendations. Do not number your comments. • 2.1.3 Recommendations • Begin with action verb and identify a due date. • 2.

12. Format:Final Report OFFICE OFSCIENCE • (MSWord; 12 pt Font) • 2.1 Use Section Number/Title corresponding to writing assignment list. • 2.1.1 Findings • Include an assessment of technical, cost, schedule, and management. Within the text of the Findings Section, include the answers to the review questions. • 2.1.2 Comments • Descriptive material assessing the findings and the conclusions based on the findings. This is narrative material and is often omitted as a separate heading and the narrative included either under Findings or Recommendations as appropriate. This heading carries more emphasis than the Findings, but does not require an action as do the Recommendations. Do not number your comments. • 2.1.3 Recommendations • Begin with action verb and identify a due date. • 2. • 3.

13. Expectations • Present closeout reports in PowerPoint. • Forward your sections for each review report (in MSWord format) to Casey Clark, casey.clark@science.doe.gov, by September 23, 8:00 a.m. (EDT).

14. Closeout Report on the Review Committee for the Large Liquid Argon Detector for Neutrino Physics (MicroBooNE) Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory September 20, 2013 Kurt W. Fisher Review Committee Chair Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy http://www.science.doe.gov/opa/

15. 2.1 Detectors W. Wisnieski, SLAC* / SC1 • Is the Estimate to Complete updated and credible? • Has the risk analysis been updated to accurately reflect the risks that remain in completing the project? • Are there any significant risks that jeopardize CD-4 completion and require high-level management attention? • Findings • Comments • Recommendations

16. 2.2 Cryogenics J. Fuerst, ANL* / SC2 • Is the Estimate to Complete updated and credible? • Has the risk analysis been updated to accurately reflect the risks that remain in completing the project? • Are there any significant risks that jeopardize CD-4 completion and require high-level management attention? • Findings • Comments • Recommendations

17. 2.3 Engineering K. Fouts, SLAC* / SC3 • Is the Estimate to Complete updated and credible? • Has the risk analysis been updated to accurately reflect the risks that remain in completing the project? • Are there any significant risks that jeopardize CD-4 completion and require high-level management attention? • Findings • Comments • Recommendations

18. 3. Cost and Schedule E. Merrill, DOE/SC* / SC4 • Is the Estimate to Complete updated and credible? • Has the risk analysis been updated to accurately reflect the risks that remain in completing the project? • Are there any significant risks that jeopardize CD-4 completion and require high-level management attention? • Findings • Comments • Recommendations

19. 3. Cost and Schedule E. Merrill, DOE/SC* / SC4

20. 4. Project Management D. Green, Retired FNAL* / SC5 • Is the Estimate to Complete updated and credible? • Has the risk analysis been updated to accurately reflect the risks that remain in completing the project? • Are there any significant risks that jeopardize CD-4 completion and require high-level management attention? • Findings • Comments • Recommendations