1 / 8

Daniel R. Lehman Review Committee Chair Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy http://www.science.doe.gov/opa/

OFFICE OF SCIENCE. Closeout Report on the Review Committee (CD-1) for the Long Baseline Neutrino Experiment (LBNE) Project at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory October 30-November 1, 2012. Daniel R. Lehman Review Committee Chair Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy

ward
Download Presentation

Daniel R. Lehman Review Committee Chair Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy http://www.science.doe.gov/opa/

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. OFFICE OFSCIENCE Closeout Report on the Review Committee (CD-1) for the Long Baseline Neutrino Experiment (LBNE) Project at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory October 30-November 1, 2012 Daniel R. Lehman Review Committee Chair Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy http://www.science.doe.gov/opa/

  2. OFFICE OF SCIENCE 2.1 BeamlineRoser, BNL*/SC1 • Does the conceptual design provide increased research capabilities envisioned in the mission need? Does the conceptual design satisfy the performance requirements recently recommended by the LBNE reconfiguration steering committee? • Do the conceptual design report and supporting documentation adequately justify the stated cost range and project duration? • Does the proposed project team and staffing plan offer adequate management experience, technical expertise, and Laboratory support to produce a credible technical, cost and schedule baseline required for CD-2? • Have all prerequisite requirements for CD-1 approval been satisfied? Is the project ready for CD-1 approval? • Findings • Comments • Recommendations

  3. OFFICE OF SCIENCE 2.2 DetectorsWisnieski, SLAC*/SC2 • Does the conceptual design provide increased research capabilities envisioned in the mission need? Does the conceptual design satisfy the performance requirements recently recommended by the LBNE reconfiguration steering committee? • Do the conceptual design report and supporting documentation adequately justify the stated cost range and project duration? • Does the proposed project team and staffing plan offer adequate management experience, technical expertise, and Laboratory support to produce a credible technical, cost and schedule baseline required for CD-2? • Have all prerequisite requirements for CD-1 approval been satisfied? Is the project ready for CD-1 approval? • Findings • Comments • Recommendations

  4. OFFICE OF SCIENCE 3. Conventional FacilitiesFallier, BNL*/SC3 • Does the conceptual design provide increased research capabilities envisioned in the mission need? Does the conceptual design satisfy the performance requirements recently recommended by the LBNE reconfiguration steering committee? • Do the conceptual design report and supporting documentation adequately justify the stated cost range and project duration? • Does the proposed project team and staffing plan offer adequate management experience, technical expertise, and Laboratory support to produce a credible technical, cost and schedule baseline required for CD-2? • Have all prerequisite requirements for CD-1 approval been satisfied? Is the project ready for CD-1 approval? • Findings • Comments • Recommendations

  5. OFFICE OF SCIENCE 4. Environment, Safety and HealthEvans, SLAC*/SC4 • Are ES&H aspects being properly addressed and are future plans sufficient given the project's current stage of development? • Have all prerequisite requirements for CD-1 approval been satisfied? Is the project ready for CD-1 approval? • Findings • Comments • Recommendations

  6. OFFICE OF SCIENCE 5. Cost and ScheduleThibadeau, ORNL*/SC5 • Do the conceptual design report and supporting documentation adequately justify the stated cost range and project duration? • Does the proposed project team and staffing plan offer adequate management experience, technical expertise, and Laboratory support to produce a credible technical, cost and schedule baseline required for CD-2? • Have all prerequisite requirements for CD-1 approval been satisfied? Is the project ready for CD-1 approval? • Findings • Comments • Recommendations

  7. OFFICE OF SCIENCE Project Status ChartThibadeau, ORNL*/SC5

  8. OFFICE OF SCIENCE 6. ManagementByon, BNL*/SC6 • Does the proposed project team and staffing plan offer adequate management experience, technical expertise, and Laboratory support to produce a credible technical, cost and schedule baseline required for CD-2? • Have all prerequisite requirements for CD-1 approval been satisfied? Is the project ready for CD-1 approval? • Findings • Comments • Recommendations

More Related