150 likes | 157 Views
This report provides an overview of potential modifications to the Tenant Protection Ordinance, including options to expand its applicability and increase relocation benefits. The report also highlights the potential unintended impacts and need for further study.
E N D
City Council Potential Modifications toTenant Protection Ordinance James Wong, Senior Project Manager October 22, 2018
Recommendation • Finding of CEQA exemption under “General Rule”, Section 15061(b)(3) • Receive staff report on potential modifications to the Tenant Protection Ordinance • Provide further direction to staff
Background TPO requires landlords of multifamily rental units to pay relocation benefits under only five (5) circumstances: 1. Demolition 2. Permanent removal of unit from market (including condo conversion) 3. Occupancy by landlord or landlord’s family member 4. Government order to vacate
Background 5. Tenants evicted from educational institution-owned housing who meet the following criteria: • Tenant’s status as student, faculty or staff has been discontinued for 365 days or more prior to eviction notice • Tenant must be in good-standing and be income-eligible
Background Income-Eligibility for TPO benefits: 140% or less of median income
Background TPO Relocation Allowance: TPO Moving Expense allowance: • $1,306 for adult household • $3,935 for household w/ dependents, seniors, disabled persons
Background TPO Cases FY 2019: • 6 cases processed • $47,471 avg income TPO-eligible tenants • $3,874 avg TPO benefit amount • 7 cases in progress
Background Survey of Other Cities • Only 19 cities in CA have local policies addressing tenant protections, just cause evictions, and/or rent control • Within LA County, only 6 cities have adopted one or more of such ordinances: Pasadena, Glendale, Beverly Hills, Los Angeles, Santa Monica, West Hollywood • 17 CA cities have just cause ordinances
TPO Modification Options Option #1: Require landlords to pay TPO relocation benefits to all tenants • Reason for tenancy termination is other than the five (5) “trigger” circumstances • Tenant in good standing, income-eligible per TPO cap, has at least 10 years tenancy • TPO relocation amount determined by length of tenancy: “Base” TPO amount if up to 10 years of tenancy, 200% of Base TPO if 20+ years of tenancy.
TPO Modification Options Option #2: Increase or eliminate 140% AMI income cap • Current 140% AMI cap for 2-person household is $72,590. • Income cap would be $99,801 if increased to 180% AMI • However, the five (5) circumstances that trigger applicability of TPO would still apply
TPO Modification Options Option #3: Expand TPO applicability to units vacated for property upgrades and re-occupancy at higher rent. • Tenant eligibility to claim relocation benefit is based on landlord certifying that eviction is to upgrade property and increase rent • May be difficult to administer/enforce as it would rely on landlord voluntarily providing a written certification
TPO Modification Options Option #4: Expand TPO applicability to large rent hikes which exceed a specified percentage increase. • Other cities are considering this option • This option requires further study as to legality and impacts • Potentially creates a heavy administrative burden due to high number of TPO cases likely to be generated
Possible Unintended Impacts • Increase operating costs for apartment owners • Cause upward pressure on rents • Discourage private investment in rental properties • Cause delays in or jeopardize development of projects that contain Inclusionary units • Administrative impacts requiring additional staff and funding resources
Potential TPO Modifications End of presentation
Background Just cause eviction ordinances Landlords can evict tenants only for certain reasons, including: • Failure to pay rent • Breach of lease • Owner move-in • Permanent removal of unit from market • Repairs that make unit uninhabitable