A REPORT ON STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT OF PEPSI COLA INTERNATIONAL (PUNJAB BEVERAGE)

2. A REPORTONSTRATEGIC MANAGEMENTOFPEPSI COLA INTERNATIONAL (PUNJAB BEVERAGE)

3. PRESENTED TOSIR SHAHID TUFAIL

4. Group Members • ADNAN HASSAN 2003-AG-3261 • FAISAL ABBAS 2009-AG-0148 • ZUBAIR AHMAD 2009-AG-0149 • SHAHEENA AKHTAR 2009-AG-0042 • TUBA SALEEM 2009-AG-0113

5. VISION“PepsiCo’s responsibility is to continually improve all aspects of the world in which we operate - environment, social, economic - creating a better tomorrow than today.”

6. MISSION STATEMENTOur mission is to be the world’s premier consumer products company focused on convenient foods and beverages. We seek to produce financial rewards to investors as we provide opportunities for growth and enrichment to our employees, our business partners and the communities in which we operate. And in everything we do, we strive for honesty, fairness and integrity.

7. SWOT ANALYSIS

8. STRENGTHS • Strong Multinational (Brand Equity) • Strong & Vast Distribution Channels • Lack Of Capital Constraints • Record Market Share • Strong Brand Portfolio • Aggressiveness In The Market (Market Leader) • Brand Promotion & Sponsorship

9. WEAKNESSES • Targeting Only Young Customers • Political Franchises • Centralized Decision Making • Decline In Taste • Motivational Factor • Not All Products Bear The Company Name

10. OPPORTUNITIES • PepsiCo New Products Can Easily Penetrate In The Market. • Noncarbonated Drinks Are The Fastest-Growing Industry • Demand Of Pepsi Is More Than Of Competitor • Changing Social Trends (Fast Foods) • Internet Promotion And Ordering Processes • May Tie Up or Liaison With Major Showrooms, Computer Centers &Restaurant

11. THREATS • Non-Carbonated Substitutes (The Mango Season) • Beverage Industry Is Mature • Fake Products (Imitators) • Competitor’s Schemes • Strong Competition With Coca-Cola Company

12. ADNANHASSAN

13. EFE MATRIX Result: Above Average Response 2.77 STRATEGY: (Moderate Aggressive)

14. IFE MATRIX RESULT IFE MATRIX SCORE 2.79 STRATEGY (Moderately Aggressive)

15. COMPETITIVE PROFILE MATRIX (CPM) Scores Pepsi Co 3.29 Coca cola co 2.50 Gourmet cola co 1.49 PepsiCo. Is More Aggressive Policy As Compare To Other Competitor

16. ZUBAIR AHMAD

17. TOWS MATRIX CRITICAL REGION SO (STRENGTHS-OPPORTUNITY)

18. SPACE MATRIX

19. TUBA SALEEM

20. IE MATRIX STRATEGY HOLD

21. Grand Strategy Matrix

22. FAISAL ABBAS

23. The Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM) STRATEGIES • NON-CARBONATED PRODUCTS • TIE UP WITH RESTAURANTS, MARRIAGE HALLS AND CLUBS

24. The Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM) Scores • Strategy 1 4.68 • Strategy 2 4.93

25. The Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM) Results PepsiCo. Should adopt the 2nd strategy that is PepsiCo may tie up Or Liaison with major marriage Halls, & restaurant and different clubs

26. Conclusion • PepsiCo. Should go for market penetration that is to increase its market share through tie up with different restaurants & clubs. • It should continue or go with its already adopted strategies such as increase its share through huge advertisement and through sponsoring different events such as PepsiCo. Continuously sponsoring cricket matches at national and international level

27. Recommendations • Pepsi cola International Company should try to emphasis more on providing their infrastructure in the market to facilitate their customers. • According to the survey, conducted by the international firm Pakistani people like little bit sweeter cola drink. So for this Pepsi cola company should produce their product according to the local demand. • Marketing team should try to increase the availability of Pepsi in rural areas. • They should also focus the old people and children.