540 likes | 793 Views
ILRI-BMZ project country report/Ethiopia:Oct 2004-Sept 2005 . Project team members. Lemma Gizachew (NPO) Ulfina Gelmessa (SNR) Zelalem Belayneh Jiregna Desalegn Gemechu Shale Temesgen Ayana Temesgen Jembere Diriba Geleti Chala Merera Gemeda Duguma Mulugeta K ebede.
E N D
Project team members • Lemma Gizachew (NPO) • Ulfina Gelmessa (SNR) • Zelalem Belayneh • Jiregna Desalegn • Gemechu Shale • Temesgen Ayana • Temesgen Jembere • Diriba Geleti • Chala Merera • Gemeda Duguma • Mulugeta Kebede
Animal/plant genetic resources of Ethiopia • AnGR is vital biodiversity component • Center of origin/diversity for a number plant & animal (breeds) species • 6400 plant species (1000 spp. indigenous) • At least 28 Trifolium spp. (9 endemic) • 24 cattle breed (type) • 13 goat • 7 sheep • 10 chicken
Contributing factors for richness in biodiversity • Diverse ecological niches (32 AEZs) or habitats • Varying breeding goals & priorities of farmers/pastoralists
Why ? • Attitudinal problem (mind set up) • Low R and D attention on indigenous AnGR • Inadequate institutional & policy support
Outstanding threats to indigenous AnGR • Breed replacement, crossbreeding, interbreeding • Habitat loss (emergence of private farms, crop/bush encroachment, range degradation) • Disease epidemics • Conflicts/raids • Drought/famine
What does the future hold for AnGR? • Appreciation of contribution: poverty reduction, improving livelihood & agric sustainability • Local & international attention shift for AnGR (country report on AnGR/ collaborations) • Emphases of regional/national research strategies • Interest in specific genetic merits of AnGR (hardiness, disease/parasite resistance) • Growing market demand (local & overseas)
Three years ILRI-BMZ project outputs • Community & priority breed identification • Community based action research • Analyses of economic, market & policy factors • Capacity building & dissemination
Community & priority breed identification • Consultation worship (relevant stakeholders) • Group discussion at community level • Output: Three PAs (Gida-Abu,Dano-Shenen & Sayo-Gambela) and cattle (Horro breed)
Capacity building • PRA for research team • Farmers field school training for trainers • Breed characterization from prodn systems context • PhD student placement/coursework (Göttingen) • Placing graduate students on project outputs related activities • Enumerator training • Farmers training (forage production/health)
Collection & compilation of information • Publications in center and national libraries consulted • Report compiled through desk review
Origin & distribution • Name derived from sub province Horro Guduru • Distributed through Wellega,Illubabor,Kefa & W.Shoa
Breed characteristics • Intermediate Sanga (medium to large) • Small & finely shaped head • Medium to large horn • Fine skin, uniform brown color • Thin dewlap • Straight & slender leg • Small udder
Productive performance • Milk yield of pure Horro: 0.4-6 l/day • Lactation length: 4-12 months • Milk yield of Horro crosses (25-50% exotic blood): 800-1400 l/lactation • Milk chemical composition (6.4% fat & 3.9 % protein) • Birth weight:18.6 ± 0.2 kg • Weaning weight:192.4 ± 6 kg • Calf management (suckling) • Growth & finishing (concentrate/crop- residue/ forage)
Reproductive performance • Age at 1st mating (heifer): 2.73-4.30 years • Age at 1st calving: 3.5-5.0 years • Weight at 1st heat:214 ± 7 kg • Weight at 1st conception:215 ±8 kg • Gestation length: 280.7- 282.2 days • NSC: natural - 1.4; AI - 1.75 • Calving interval: 14.5-24.0 months
Gaps • Characterization work incomplete • No emphases on improvement thru selection • Mechanism to regulate uncontrolled cross-breeding/ interbreeding • Absence of community based AnGR management • Limited work on consumer preferences, power output improvement, market & policy • Low level of end-users involvement/limited adoption of developed technologies
Major objectives • Adequately describe the project study sites • Identify the major roles livestock play in the lives of the farming communities • Identify constraints and possible interventions for improvement of livestock production & marketing systems
Methodology • Participatory situation analyses
Source of info • Secondary data (Agric Dev’t /PA offices) • Direct observation by multidisciplinary team • Key informant interview
Data analyses • Use of PRA tools (triangulation, conceptualization, tabulation, etc)
Household size & structure • HH size:4-16 • HH structure:Young> old
Land use pattern from community resource map/focus of feed intervention? /
Purpose of keeping livestock • Sources of incidental expense • Storage of food • Financial reserve during economic stress • Input to crop production • Wealth accumulation & security • Buffering against crop failure
Preferred cattle traits • Coat color (disease/flies/ feeding response) • Body conformation • Body size (growth rate & prolificacy) • Naval flap & tail size • Size & orientation of horn
Feed resources • Communal pasture • Crop residues • Browses • Supplements (salt)
Interventions to feed shortage problems • Conservation & proper utilization of feeds • Reducing herd size • Privatization of communal grazing • Paddocking & rotational grazing of NP • Use of shrubs & browses • Growing improved forages
Animal health • Major diseases: Tryps, anthrax, black leg, • Occurrence: seasonal • Most affected class: oxen/milking cows
Livestock marketing • Species of preference: Chicken > Shoats > Cattle • Reason of sale:incidental expenses, school fee & credit repayment • Market channel:farmer ⇨ small traders/ butchers (1° market)⇨ big traders (2° market) ⇨ big traders (3° market)⇨ big traders (terminal market) • Market info: informal (physical presence/ neighbor • Price formation: Socio-cultural events, crop performance, season (oxen), body feature (color), brokers • Constraints: infrastructure, info, volume, capital, transport
Community-based interventions • Deciding livestock asset function requiring improvement • Delineating roles & responsibilities of the project and the communities