330 likes | 463 Views
E N D
2. DART Clean Fuel Fleet Presentation Agenda
Background & Overview of results
Various strategies of program
Technologies deployed
Experiences and lessons learned
Future targets
3. DART Clean Fuel Fleet Background
Bus & Light Rail Operating profile
13 cities - +700 square miles
759 Buses
95 Light Rail Vehicles
170 Paratransit Vans & Sedans
400 Non-Revenue Vehicles
50 Passenger Facilities - ~12,000 Stops
~37,000,000 miles annually
~56,500,000 passengers annually
Background on DARTBackground on DART
4. DART Clean Fuel Fleet Board policy promulgated in early 1996 requires DART:
take all reasonable steps and makes use of available technology to limit the amount of environmental pollutants
procure and use engines and fuels which produce only low emissions of pollutants.
This initiative got started with a very reasonable set of board policies that have guided us over the last almost 10 years.
READThis initiative got started with a very reasonable set of board policies that have guided us over the last almost 10 years.
READ
5. DART Clean Fuel Fleet 83% of fleet classified Texas Clean Fuel Fleet
95 ZEV LRVs (Electric)
11 ULEV Trolley Buses (CNG)
184 ULEV 40 Transit Buses (LNG)
360 ULEV 40 Transit Buses (Diesel)
200 ULEV Non-Revenue Vehicles (CNG)
170 LEV Paratransit vehicles (Diesel/Gasoline)
91 LEV 30 Buses (Diesel)
75 LEV Non-Revenue Vehicles (Diesel/Gasoline)
Of the approximate 1,400 vehicles in the DART fleet 83% of them are classified as Texas Clean Fuel Fleet vehicles.Of the approximate 1,400 vehicles in the DART fleet 83% of them are classified as Texas Clean Fuel Fleet vehicles.
6. DART Clean Fuel Fleet TCEQ reported to State Legislature:
DART generated 730 pollution credits in 2000
60% of all credits generated by Texas MTAs
219% more credits than next highest MTA
Of the 1,216 credits generated by transit authorities, DART generated 730 or 60% of all the credits. Some 219% more than the next highest MTAOf the 1,216 credits generated by transit authorities, DART generated 730 or 60% of all the credits. Some 219% more than the next highest MTA
7. DART Clean Fuel Fleet Fleet Replacement
8. DART Clean Fuel Fleet Aggressive Fleet Replacement Program
708 buses replaced/retired since 1998
Fleet emissions reduced by 59% compared to `98
Eliminated 790 tons/year of NOx
Reduced particulates to near-zero or below ambient
9. DART Clean Fuel Fleet
10. DART Clean Fuel Fleet Fleet Replacement
Liquefied Natural Gas
11. DART Clean Fuel Fleet Natural Gas Programs
Expended $19.4m to date on bus & NRV programs
DART consumes ~5.5m gallons of natural gas per year
DART continues to absorb $0.08 per mile additional fuel cost with no additional subsidies
12. DART Clean Fuel Fleet Project Results
Published by NREL
Available on-line at www.nrel.gov
Confirmed improved exhaust emissions over `98 technology diesel
Confirmed increased operating costs over `98 technology diesel
13. DART Clean Fuel Fleet LNG Project Costs
+$38k capital cost per bus
$4.5mm per fueling facility
$500k facility modifications
20k hours training
Fuel +$0.08 per mile
14. DART Clean Fuel Fleet Blue line is favorable because of our current fixed price natural gas contract that expires in 2005. Paying 2002 market prices
Dotted red line is more indicative of current market prices and what we expect to experience upon contract renewal.Blue line is favorable because of our current fixed price natural gas contract that expires in 2005. Paying 2002 market prices
Dotted red line is more indicative of current market prices and what we expect to experience upon contract renewal.
15. DART Clean Fuel Fleet Fleet Replacement
Liquefied Natural Gas
EGR & Ultra-Low Sulfur Diesel
16. DART Clean Fuel Fleet Project Overview
Installation of low-pressure exhaust gas recirculation system
Replacement of existing catalyzed muffler with upgraded system.
Use of ultra-low sulfur fuel (15 ppm)
LPEGR & particulate filters coupled with the use of ultra-low sulfur diesel fuel, the first in Northeast Texas.
The project has three components
The installation of a device called low-pressure exhaust gas recirculation. This is similar technology to that which exists today on your gasoline automobile. It diverts a small portion of the exhaust back into the engine to be re-burned. Reducing NOx
The installation of an improved catalyzed muffler. This muffler now incorporates a filter that filters out fine particles of exhaust called particulates
The last, and probably the most important, is the use of ultra low sulfur fuel <15ppm Talk about it being the ENABLER for technologiesLPEGR & particulate filters coupled with the use of ultra-low sulfur diesel fuel, the first in Northeast Texas.
The project has three components
The installation of a device called low-pressure exhaust gas recirculation. This is similar technology to that which exists today on your gasoline automobile. It diverts a small portion of the exhaust back into the engine to be re-burned. Reducing NOx
The installation of an improved catalyzed muffler. This muffler now incorporates a filter that filters out fine particles of exhaust called particulates
The last, and probably the most important, is the use of ultra low sulfur fuel <15ppm Talk about it being the ENABLER for technologies
17. DART Clean Fuel Fleet Project Benefits
1,222 tons NOx reduction
Positively effects other constituents
Cost effectiveness factor - ~$6.9k/ton
$13k TCEQ Funding Limit
No infrastructure modifications
Emissions equal to, or better than, natural gas
DART and the TCEQ are excited about this project because of its many benefits
It substantially reduces our NOx emissions, by over 1,200 tons over the life of the buses
It has positive effects on other exhaust constituents as well, which Ill show you in a moment
At ~ $6.9k/ ton it is substantially below the cost effectiveness ceiling set by TNRCC of $13k per ton.
It requires no modifications to our divisions, no new tanks etc.
Emissions results are equal to or better than similar vintage natural gas
DART and the TCEQ are excited about this project because of its many benefits
It substantially reduces our NOx emissions, by over 1,200 tons over the life of the buses
It has positive effects on other exhaust constituents as well, which Ill show you in a moment
At ~ $6.9k/ ton it is substantially below the cost effectiveness ceiling set by TNRCC of $13k per ton.
It requires no modifications to our divisions, no new tanks etc.
Emissions results are equal to or better than similar vintage natural gas
18. This slide shows the results of the project in comparison to the unmodified bus and a similar bus operating on LNG.
With the Engelhard equipment and ultra low sulfur diesel fuel we achieve a:
Not only 52% reduction in NOx but a
91% reduction in Hydrocarbons
73% reduction in Carbon Monoxide
And an 88% reduction in Particulates, but more impressive is that Particulates are reduced to 5/1,000th of a gram. 25% of that of our natural gas engines.
Talk about the 98 & 02 standards
This slide shows the results of the project in comparison to the unmodified bus and a similar bus operating on LNG.
With the Engelhard equipment and ultra low sulfur diesel fuel we achieve a:
Not only 52% reduction in NOx but a
91% reduction in Hydrocarbons
73% reduction in Carbon Monoxide
And an 88% reduction in Particulates, but more impressive is that Particulates are reduced to 5/1,000th of a gram. 25% of that of our natural gas engines.
Talk about the 98 & 02 standards
19. DART Clean Fuel Fleet Texas Senate Bill 5 (Brown/Wolens)
Enacted in 2001
Provides funding for cost effective retrofit of existing equipment to reduce NOx
Established the Texas Emissions Reduction Program (TERP) to be administered through the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ)
While we were not able to secure CMAQ funding for these projects, many of these projects would likely be eligible for such funding in your areas. We were able to secure funding from a source unique to Texas.
PROVIDE Background on TERPWhile we were not able to secure CMAQ funding for these projects, many of these projects would likely be eligible for such funding in your areas. We were able to secure funding from a source unique to Texas.
PROVIDE Background on TERP
20. DART Clean Fuel Fleet Applied for several TERP grants through the TCEQ
1st Grant - $7,591,680 Awarded 6/2002
Retrofit of 360 buses with low-pressure EGR
Early deployment of ultra-low sulfur diesel
1,222 tons NOx reduction over life of equipment
2nd Grant - $324,000 Awarded 8/2003
Continued use of ULSD up to TxLED requirement
25 tons NOx reduction over life of activity
21. DART Clean Fuel Fleet Applied for several TERP grants through the TCEQ
3rd Grant - $589,720 Contract Pending
Retrofit of 80 buses with low-NOx technology
Expanded use of ULSD in balance of fleet
80 tons of NOx reduction over life of equipment
Program has funded a reduction in fleet emissions of ~1,300 tons
This is our latest grant which is pending contract. This technology Ill cover in a few minutes.This is our latest grant which is pending contract. This technology Ill cover in a few minutes.
22. DART Clean Fuel Fleet This chart quantifies the other component of the TERP program which is cost effectiveness. This shows the cost per ton of NOx reduction for each of our two emissions reduction technologies, LNG and EGR. The emissions reductions coupled with the cost effectiveness really makes this latest project exciting.
This chart quantifies the other component of the TERP program which is cost effectiveness. This shows the cost per ton of NOx reduction for each of our two emissions reduction technologies, LNG and EGR. The emissions reductions coupled with the cost effectiveness really makes this latest project exciting.
23. DART Clean Fuel Fleet Fleet Replacement
Liquefied Natural Gas
EGR & Ultra-Low Sulfur Diesel
Exhaust Aftertreatment
24. DART Clean Fuel Fleet Project Overview
Installation of exhaust aftertreatment device
Certified 50-States August 2004
Cleaire Longview System
Modular Design
The latest project is installation of exhaust aftertreatment on 2002 year model buses
System has now been certified and verified in all 50 states as of August 2004
Modular design allowing for ease of installationThe latest project is installation of exhaust aftertreatment on 2002 year model buses
System has now been certified and verified in all 50 states as of August 2004
Modular design allowing for ease of installation
25. DART Clean Fuel Fleet Schematic of Cleaire Longview
Schematic of Cleaire Longview
26. DART Clean Fuel Fleet Project Overview
NOx Reduction Catalyst
Catalyzed Diesel Particulate Filter
Use of ultra-low sulfur fuel (15 ppm)
25% NOx Reduction
>85% PM Reduction
Incorporates both a NOx reduction catalyst and a catalyzed particulate filter
Requires use of ultra low sulfur fuel
Impressive emissions reductionIncorporates both a NOx reduction catalyst and a catalyzed particulate filter
Requires use of ultra low sulfur fuel
Impressive emissions reduction
27. DART Clean Fuel Fleet Project Benefits
80 tons NOx reduction
Positively effects other constituents
Cost effectiveness factor - ~$7k/ton
$13k TCEQ Funding Limit
No infrastructure modifications
Modular design for ease of installation
25% NOx reduction = 80 tons over life of equipment
>85% PM reduction
>60% reduction in carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons
Very cost effective at $7k/ton NOx reduction
No other facility or infrastructure modifications
25% NOx reduction = 80 tons over life of equipment
>85% PM reduction
>60% reduction in carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons
Very cost effective at $7k/ton NOx reduction
No other facility or infrastructure modifications
28. DART Clean Fuel Fleet Lessons Learned
Remain fuel-neutral
Allow technology to drive solutions
Seek private/public partnerships & participation
Prepare for technology changes
Modify support contract relationships
29. DART Clean Fuel Fleet 2000 = 4.0g
2002 = 2.4g
2007 = 0.2g2000 = 4.0g
2002 = 2.4g
2007 = 0.2g
30. DART Clean Fuel Fleet Briefing
32. DART Clean Fuel Fleet