1 / 22

Individual Differences and CALL

Individual Differences and CALL. Presented by group 3: 1. Rudi Haryono 2. Mustarik 3. Elih Sutisna Yanto Department of English Language, University of Prof. Dr. HAMKA, Jakarta. TYPES OF OUT COME VARIATION-RELATED MODELS. Independent learner variables. The Good Learner Model

grady
Download Presentation

Individual Differences and CALL

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Individual Differences and CALL Presented by group 3: 1. Rudi Haryono 2. Mustarik 3. ElihSutisnaYanto Department of English Language, University of Prof. Dr. HAMKA, Jakarta

  2. TYPES OF OUT COME VARIATION-RELATED MODELS

  3. Independent learner variables The Good Learner Model (Naiman, Frohlich, Todesco, and Stern (1978) Monitor Theory (Dulay,Burt, Krashen, 1982) Brown and Fraser’s framework Levin’s schematic model

  4. The ‘Good Language-Learner’ ModelBY NAIMAN et.al TEACHING Materials Syllabus Methodology resources Unconscious process • Generalization • -transfer • -simplification • Conscious processes • -strategies Profiency -listening -speaking -reading -writing Errors Interlanguage Affective reasons THE LEANERS Age Intelligence Aptitude Motivation Personality Cognitive style THE CONTEXT EFL/ESL Opportunities for use Social Milieu

  5. Monitor theory(Dulay, Burt, and Krashen, 1982) M O N I T O R O U T P U T I N P U T Affective Filter Cognitive Organizers This theory postulates that The affective filter may cause the quality of acquisition [output] to be higher or lower

  6. Model with interdependent learner variables -- Individual outcome distinguishes Individual-related variables Other variables Spolsky’s model Skehan’s model Gardner’s theoretical model

  7. Gardner’s (1979) schematic representation of the theoretical model Social milieu Social milieu Individual differences Social milieu Intelligent Formal language training linguistic Language Aptitude Cultural belief Motivation Informal language training Non linguistic Situational anxiety Figure -9

  8. Spolky’s (1989:28) model of second language learning Family, home, community Social context leads to learners which appear in the learner as Motivation which joins with other personal characteristics such as Age Personality Capabilities Previous Knowledge all of which explain the use the learners makes of the available Learning opportunities (formal or informal) the interplay/interaction between learner and situation determining Linguistic and non-linguistic Outcomes for the learner

  9. SUMMARY

  10. THANK YOU

  11. GLOSSARY

  12. GLOSSARY

  13. Possible variables affecting language learning

  14. Possible variables affecting language learning

  15. Possible variables affecting language learning

  16. Possible variables affecting language learning

  17. Possible variables affecting language learning

  18. Possible variables affecting language learning

More Related