220 likes | 305 Views
Review of Web 2.0 Services mobile. Kim Min Jae Kim Youn Ho Yun Seong Geun Hong Su Lyn. contents. introduction. examples. comparison. suggestion. contents. introduction. examples. comparison. suggestion. introduction. mobile?. data service through WAP.
E N D
Review of Web 2.0 Servicesmobile Kim Min Jae Kim Youn Ho Yun SeongGeun Hong Su Lyn
contents. introduction. examples. comparison. suggestion.
contents. introduction. examples. comparison. suggestion.
introduction mobile? • data service through WAP. • expensive rate & low speed. • text-based. FEATURE PHONES
introduction mobile? • for industrial purpose. • websites for PDA. PDA PHONES
introduction mobile? • gradual transition for mobile environment. • popularization of smart phones. • importance of mobile. SMART PHONES
introduction web vs. app
introduction mobile in libraries • to satisfy user's needs for mobile library. • not to restrict user's accessibility.
contents. introduction. examples. comparison. suggestion.
examples types of library. • public library. • The National Library of Korea • GyeonggidoCyber Library • OsanPublic Library • academic library. • POSTECH Library • Chung-angUniv Library • etc.
National Library. http://m.nl.go.kr • started in July 1, 2010. • most plentiful & diverse functions. • comfortable & easy interface. • available without membership.
Gyeonggido Cyber Library. http://m.library.kr • started in Feb. 10, 2011. • digital library by cooperationbetween local libraries. • e-book service for smartphone. • mobile app to provide infoof local libraries. • simple interface. • membership providedonly for local residents.
Osan Public Library. http://m.osanlibrary.go.kr • started in June, 2010.
Chung-ang Univ. http://ml.cau.ac.kr • started in Mar. 2, 2011. • supported for various campus. • quite a few functions. • familiar interface. • only Korean language.
POSTECH Library. http://m.library.postech.ac.kr • started in Nov. 17, 2010. • developed by AirPAC. • faithful basic functions. • specialized for academic sources. • not polish but intuitive design.
examples common functions. • book search. • library information & services. • e-resources. • my library.
contents. introduction. examples. comparison. suggestion.
comparision types of library. • public library. • academic library. • etc.
contents. introduction. examples. comparison. suggestion.
suggestion book search • necessary of search method like using camera. simply search method barcode search like National Library QR code, cover image search
suggestion book search • necessary of detailed bibliographic information. insufficient book information detailed information like abstract, review
suggestion library information & services • necessary of optimized service for mobile. inconsistent design poor contents than PC version redirecting to PC version optimization for mobile like Chung-angUniv.