1 / 17

Vadim Chumak Scientific Center for Radiation Medicine AMS Ukraine

VERIFICATION OF THE CHERNOBYL REGISTRY DOSIMETRIC DATA AS A RESOURCE FOR EFFICIENT DOSIMETRIC SUPPORT SOLUTION FOR POST-CHERNOBYL HEALTH EFFECTS STUDIES. Vadim Chumak Scientific Center for Radiation Medicine AMS Ukraine. Total number of liquidators (UNSCEAR, 2000).

gram
Download Presentation

Vadim Chumak Scientific Center for Radiation Medicine AMS Ukraine

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. VERIFICATION OF THE CHERNOBYL REGISTRY DOSIMETRIC DATA AS A RESOURCE FOR EFFICIENT DOSIMETRIC SUPPORT SOLUTION FOR POST-CHERNOBYL HEALTH EFFECTS STUDIES Vadim Chumak Scientific Center for Radiation Medicine AMS Ukraine

  2. Total number of liquidators (UNSCEAR, 2000)

  3. Inventory of dosimetric databases • Only about 47% records in SRU, which are related to liquidators of 1986-1990, contain individual doses (51% for 1986-1987) • 95% of ODR in SRU belong to military liquidators • Six IDM databases related to civilian liquidators (ChNPP, AC-605, PA “Combinat”) – 168,394 dose records – failure to link with SRU data • Paper archives of the Ministry of Defense were converted into electronic databases (ca.50,000 records) – good overlap and coincidence with SRU data

  4. Frequency histogram of doses of military liquidators (“partisans”) of 1986

  5. Frequency histogram of individual daily doses of military liquidators of 1986

  6. Normalized probability plot for distribution of daily doses of military liquidators (“partisans”) of 1986 (HLN hypothesis)

  7. Experimental dependence of entropy coefficient on increment of histogram  (solid line) and modeled calibration dependencies

  8. Dosimetry methods • TLD monitoring with a personal dosimeter • “group-dosimetry” – one dosimeter per group of workers • “group-estimation” – one pre-calculated dose to a whole group of workers

  9. EPR dosimetry:metrological parameters of SCRM protocol • Sensitivity threshold – 50 mGy Simplified error propagation model: • + 25 mGy for dose <250 mGy • + 10% for dose >250 mGy

  10. Cutting tooth into lingual and buccal parts

  11. Samples for analysis: Tooth acquisition network in Ukraine

  12. Samples for analysis: results of tooth collection effort • Teeth are being collected in 167 hospitals by 314 dentists • 7,657 teeth were collected over the period of operation (as per March 1, 2006) • 4,635 liquidators had donated teeth • 3,511 teeth are appropriate for high precision EPR dosimetry • 805 doses were reconstructed including 638 with HPT

  13. Calibration against EPR dosimetry:Distribution of ODR/EPR ratio

  14. Retrospective assessment of bias and uncertainty of ODR (2002) • 92 subjects with group assessment ODR (military liquidators of 1986-1987) • EPR used as a reference (point dose estimate) • Ratio ODR/EPR is considered as model uncertainty distribution • Parameters of distribution (2003 data for 119 subjects): GM – 0.39 (0.43) GSD – 2.14 (2.05)

  15. Plan of validation of official dose records in SRU • Collection of teeth from liquidators • Stratification of military liquidators by category of dosimetric data • Application of EPR dosimetry as a reference for recalibration of ODR • Elaboration of criteria for identification of falsified dose values

  16. Expected outcome • Ca.60,000 validated and re-calibrated Official Dose Records • Individual uncertainty distributions (possibility to derive point estimate along with uncertainty) • Dosimetric database for SRU members to be available for researchers of post-Chernobyl medical effects

  17. Thank you!

More Related