1 / 15

USJFCOM Exercise Support Working Group 30 March 2010

USJFCOM Exercise Support Working Group 30 March 2010. COL Dave Paschal USJFCOM J-7. USJFCOM Exercise Support Brief-back.

gregory
Download Presentation

USJFCOM Exercise Support Working Group 30 March 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. USJFCOM Exercise Support Working Group 30 March 2010 COL Dave Paschal USJFCOM J-7

  2. USJFCOM Exercise Support Brief-back • Purpose: This Working Group was convened to examine USJFCOM J7 exercise support. An in- depth look at the current year and next year calendar as well as an overarching view of 2-3 years out. • Discussion: • Conducted a month by month review of Joint Warfighting Center (JWFC) Exercise support calendar to resolve dates and support issues • Updated JWFC Deployable Training Team (DTT) support - returning the planning factor to two DTT’s • Caveat - real world operational support takes precedence • January Deconfliction Conference is the starting point for support issue identification • May and August continue to be support challenges at least thru 2013. • AW 11 concept support will to be socialized prior to the next WJTSC • KORCOM support and USPACOM priorities need to be addressed. • Outcomes: Excellent exchange between combatant command representatives concerning priorities and factors influencing JWFC support in their area of responsibility. • Integrated Operations Training: Mission Rehearsal Exercises and combatant command events are Inherently Integrated Operations Training Events • Issues: None

  3. Joint Task Force Capable Headquarters Readiness Working Group 30 March 2010 Mr. Dan Abahazy USJFCOM J-7

  4. JTF Capable HQ Brief-back • Purpose: Working Group (WG) addressed previously identified functional areas requiring increased training emphasis for Service HQ designated to be JTF capable HQ • Discussion: • Seven areas were identified in previous Working Group meetings: 1) Training for individual augmentees, 2) Training of Boards, Bureaus, Centers, Cells, Working Groups (B2C2WG), 3) Joint Manning Document (JMD) development/management, 4) Deployment planning/TPFDD development, 5) Readiness Reporting Tools, 6) Computer Network Defense, 7) Interagency. • Each of the seven areas were discussed to characterize the scope of the gap • Approaches developed to begin to mitigate gaps for items 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6. • Item 5 and 7 were assessed as already identified issues with actions ongoing in other venues • Combination of improving already existing training products and services and developing new products and services will be examined; Joint Knowledge Online (JKO) products and services will be used to extent possible • Need for senior DOD guidance on JTF HQ requirements remains a concern • Outcomes: • Way ahead for above items developed; Command & Control (C2) Capability Portfolio Management JTF HQ Focus Integration Team Training WG will continue to collaborate and address actions. • Integrated Operations Training: Item 7: training with interagency partners is directly related. Existing procedures and initiatives will be leveraged. • Issues: existing issues 09-11 and 10-001 addressed in CE2 SLT

  5. Joint Knowledge Development and Distribution Capability Stakeholder Meeting 30 March 2010 Mr. Joe Camacho USJFCOM J-7

  6. JKDDC Stakeholder Meeting Brief-back • Purpose: Provide Program Updates, propose FY11 Program Goals and Objectives, Review FY11 Stakeholder Requirements, Discuss Emerging Issues and New Business • Discussion: • ~100 participants (Combatant commands, Services, USA Training & Doctrine Command (TRADOC), P&R, Combined Staff (CYBERCOM), other Combat support Agencies (CSAs). • Updates on products, metrics, projects • Small Group Scenario Trainer (SGST), Virtual Cultural Awareness Trainer (VCAT), Learning Management system (LMS) prototype demos • J7 Commander’s Intent for FY11 Goals and Objectives validated and vetted • Stakeholder briefs on Joint Knowledge On-Line (JKO) enabled programs • TRADOC demonstration of virtual world progress • Budget, issues and Way Ahead discussions in prep for next stakeholders resource allocation conference • Stakeholders survey collected • Outcomes: • J7 Guidance for FY 11 Goals and Objectives incorporated • Stakeholders satisfied with current status of JKO and understand challenges for the future Integrated Operations Training: JKO web based training is a demonstrated enabling capability and tool for integrated operations training • Issues: None

  7. Joint Training Enterprise Working Group 30 March 2010 CAPT Bill Kovach USJFCOM J-7

  8. Joint Training Enterprise Brief-back • Purpose:To work Enterprise level requirements, activities, and shortfalls focused on improving the Joint Training Environment. • Discussion: • Joint National Training Capability (JNTC) Corporate Board • USJFCOM and Services presented (pre-decisional) POM 12 quads for collaboration and discussion • JNTC Program Director presented program update and received stakeholder approval on FY11 fixed costs • Joint Training Enterprise technical updates • USJFCOM J7 presented status of J7/JNTC programs including Next Gen Joint Training & Experimentation (JTEN), Joint Live Virtual Constructive (JLVC) Federation, Joint Theater Level Simulation way forward and Cross Domain Information Sharing (CDIS) initiatives. • National Electromagnetic (EM) OPFOR Program Initiative – USSTRATCOM • Joint Unmanned Aerial Systems (JUAS) Collective Training Discussion – JUAS COE • Outcomes: This group is the focal point to collaboratively address issues impacting joint training at Services/Combatant Command venues. • Integrated Operations Training: Highlighted at this meeting were problems associated with Joint ISR and interagency integration. • Issues: N/A

  9. Australian, Canadian, Great Britain and United States (ACGU) Working Group 31 March 2010 COL Tom Walrond USJFCOM J-7

  10. ACGU Training Integration Brief-back • Purpose:To provide a collaborative forum to enhance ACGU Joint, Combined, and Multilateral training that increase operational capability, preparedness and improve interoperability; • Discussion: • Validated the Joint Training Coordination Program (JTCP) as the means to schedule training • Provided way ahead on ACGU Training Environment Enclave (JTEN) • Continue to engage, socialize and work ‘Enhancement of ACGU Interoperability’ issues • Expand to allow COCOMs to collaborate with ACGU partners and to share activities, synchronize capabilities, and solicit ACGU training participation • Discussed ACGU lessons learned  Diverted to Joint Lessons Learned Working Group • Outcomes: Successfully achieved objectives and desired end state; Refocusing on integrating partner training environments with the Joint Training Environment • Integrated Operations Training: Principal focus now shifts to development and execution of the ACGU Training Environment to increase training opportunities by enhancing interoperability • Issues: 08-018 Integration of ACGU Partners into the Joint Training Enterprise

  11. Integration of ACGU Partnersinto the Joint Training Enterprise JUN 09 OCT 09 DEC 09 Briefer: Col Walrond ACGU: Australia, Canada, Great Britain, United States • Issue 08-018: The enhancement of ACGU Joint, Combined, Multilateral training in order to increase operational capability, preparedness, and improve interoperability. • Discussion:  No formal procedure exists for scheduling and coordinating ACGU Joint Combined and Multilateral training and use of the full range of Live Virtual Constructive (LVC) training capabilities. An ACGU working group (WG), including Combatant Commands and JS J7, needs to be established to draft agreement(s), develop business rules, and identify/develop the appropriate forum for coordination. The WG will use the PACOM-AUS Joint Combined Training Capability (JCTC) work as a starting point. Formal business rules will require a long term effort, but short term efforts will continue to leverage existing multilateral venues. • Endstate: Defense level policy guidance, and agreements. A formal coordination process, business rules and/or other documents as necessary for ACGU partners and combatant commands/Services that outlines the process for scheduling and coordinating bi-lateral and multilateral training and exercises enhanced via LVC enablers using ACGU networks. Short term endstate will address OIF/OEF pre-deployment training. Long term solution expected to take several years. • POA&M: - Formalize overarching vision statement and reach agreement in principle (c/w) • - Establish ACGU Working Group membership and chair (Policy/Scheduling and Technical/Systems) (c/w) • - Define ACGU training scope • - Establishment of a scheduling process for the JTEN and Virtual & Constructive assets • - Develop and adopt ACGU country agreements/business rules formalizing this process • OPR: USJFCOM; OCRs: USPACOM, USNORTHCOM, USEUCOM, ADF, PJHQ J7, CFD/CFEC, OSD. JAN 10 MAR 10 SEP 08 MAR 09 ApprovedPOA&M Established ACGU WG Initial ACGU WG Agreement in principle Determine venue for event coordination Draft ACGU Charter Enlist OSD rep as WG member Objectives/End State Obtained; Action Completed

  12. Modeling and Simulation (M&S) Working Group 30 March 2010 Col Tom Walrond USJFCOM J-7

  13. M&S Brief-back • Purpose:To provide a collaborative forum to advance the Joint Training Environment by focusing on M&S capabilities, policy, gaps ,current/future initiatives, interoperability and standards • Discussion: • Training Gap Analysis Forum (TGAF): a mature process executed in February 2010 that combines stakeholder requirements with rigorous frontend analysis • Training M&S Business Plan: Current plan in coordination with other M&S Communities • Application of M&S and Gaming to support deployed Small Unit Mission Rehearsal • Joint Theater Level Simulation (JTLS) way ahead brief: obtain resources to integrate into JLVC , modernize JTLS code and evolve with other M&S simulations • KORCOM: developing an enterprise training capability to support USFK transformation • Outcomes: Formalize an M&S Community of Interest (CoI) to address enterprise level issues that are aligned with Department of Defense (DoD) Training Strategy • Integrated Operations TrainingTop issues: Cross Domain Information Sharing/interoperability standards • Issues: Recommend 07-014 be combined with 09-001 • 07-014 Supporting Joint Training with the Joint Live, Virtual, Constructive (LVC) Federation • 09-001 Joint Training Enterprise M&S Gaps (POM 12)

  14. Issue 07-014: Diminishing resources dictate the need for a cost effective solution for delivering Joint training. Currently both the JLVC Federation & Joint Theater Level Simulation (JTLS) support Joint training. A revised strategy for development & sustainment of an enterprise training capability that supports Joint training is required Discussion: The JLVC Federation is the standard for Joint training & provides the most realistic environment to align joint training with combatant command assigned missions, requirements & constraints. The JLVC federation is comprised of both Joint & Service simulations & tools. JTLS supports the combatant command Joint Exercise Program (JEP), yet, JTLS lacks the capability to model high fidelity strategic to tactical operations. This shortfall was noted in the Joint Staff’s Training Capabilities Analysis of Alternatives Gaps 1-22. JLVC addresses these gaps. Recent cuts to Training Transformation (T2) Research, Development, Testing & Evaluation funds have driven the need for a revised strategy for development & sustainment of an enterprise training capability that can met future training requirements such as those of United States Korea Command (KORCOM). JTLS sustainment is funded (O&M) for FY10. Sustained maintenance of JTLS is required. The JLVC is funded through the FYDP with combatant command funding for event integration (CE2) & USJFCOM T2 funding for development. Endstate: A single Joint training federation that is compostable, has a low overhead competitive capability, & can meet the training requirements of Tier I – IV training audiences (including those of KORCOM). POA&M: Develop a JLVC low cost option. Determine capabilities of JTLS needed to be incorporated into the JLVC. Develop a plan for implementing capabilities into the JLVC & conduct a business case analysis to determine cost effectiveness of the plan. Conduct front end analysis of KORCOM training requirements. Obtain needed T2 funding for JLVC development. OPRs: USJFCOM, JS J-7;OCRs: Combatant Commands Supporting Joint Training with the Joint Live Virtual Constructive (JLVC) Federation Briefer: Col Tom Walrond POM 12 MAY - JUL 09 NOV 08 FY11 SEP 09 MAR 09 Mar 10 AUG 09 MAR 10 Training Gap Analysis Forum Develop JLVC Low Cost options Obtain KORCOM funding Front End Analysis of KORCOM Requirements Submit PR11 funding Rqmnts Brief OSD on KORCOM funding strategies Develop plan with costing to incorporate JTLS Requirements into the JLVC Obtain JTLS funding through FYDP JTLS / JLVC transition decision

  15. Joint Training EnterpriseTraining Modeling & Simulation Gaps Issue09-001: Joint Training Enterprise identified key training Modeling & Simulation (M&S) gaps which are currently unfunded. Discussion: The Joint Training Enterprise executed a M&S Training Gap Analysis Forum (TGAF) on 16 February 2010 in order to re-validate the top training M&S gaps as directed by OSD P&R. The forum was conducted using the established Joint Training Review Group ( JTRG) technical requirement procedures. Re-validation occurred with minimal change to the prioritized issue list. Three of the top identified gaps from the M&S TGAF are currently unfunded (IAMD, Space, Cyber). Endstate: Approval of validated M&S TGAF process and results; funding or mitigation plans to support the development of solutions that close the training M&S gaps identified by the Joint Training Enterprise. POA&M: Joint Training Enterprise identified the M&S Gaps; USJFCOM to lead the effort of gap analysis to determine detailed estimated costs to close the gaps. Conduct detailed analysis to determine optimal solutions. OPR:USJFCOM;OCRs: Combatant Commands; Services Briefer: Col Walrond FEB 2010 MAR 2010 AUG 2010 AUG 09 NOV 08 MAR 09 JUL 09 M&S TGAF (Solutions Conference) M&S TGAF Briefed top 5 Training M&S Gaps at WJTSC 09-1 M&S TGAF VTC Brief analysis at WJTSC 09-2 M&S TGAF (Solutions Conference) M&S TGAF VTC 15

More Related