1 / 56

Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC .

Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC . . Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com. Some typical questions on verticals. How much of ground system is it worth putting down? What will I “gain” (in dB!) by adding more radials?

guinivere
Download Presentation

Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC .

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Ground Systems for HF Verticals some experimental comparisons to NEC. Rudy Severns N6LF antennasbyn6lf.com

  2. Some typical questions on verticals • How much of ground system is it worth putting down? • What will I “gain” (in dB!) by adding more radials? • Does it matter if I lay the radials on the ground surface? • Are a few long radials useful? • Are four elevated radials really as good as lots of buried radials? • How well do “gullwing” elevated radials work?

  3. We can use modeling or calculations to answer these questions but most people don’t have a lot confidence in mathematical exercises. • High quality field measurements on real antennas are more likely to be believed. • Over the past year I have done a series of experiments on HF verticals with different ground systems. • That is the subject of today’s talk.

  4. Comment • Today’s talk is a snapshot of experimental work. • The talk will only cover the highlights. • A detailed summary of the test range and instrumentation along with reports on each experiment can be found on my web page: antennasbyn6lf.com . • A copy of this PowerPoint presentation will also be on the web site. • You may also see other interesting information on the web page.

  5. What’s the purpose of the ground system? • It’s there to reduce the power absorbed by the soil close to the antenna (within a ¼-wave or so). • The ground system increases your signal by reducing the power dissipated in the soil and maximizing the radiated power. • Any practical ground system will not affect the radiation angle or far-field pattern!

  6. Power transmission antenna 1 antenna 2 antenna equivalent circuit

  7. Measurement schemes • The classical technique is to excite the test antenna with a known power and measure the resulting signal strength at some point in the far field (>2.5 wavelengths for 1/4-wave vertical). • This approach takes great care and good equipment to make accurate measurements.

  8. The modern alternative is to use a vector network analyzer (VNA) in the transmission mode. This approach is capable of reliable measurements to <0.1 dB. The VNA will also give you the input impedance of the antenna at the feed-point. S21 rx antenna test antenna

  9. Some experimental results

  10. The first experiment was a 160 m, ¼-wave wire vertical with two ground stakes and 4 to 64 radials. • Measurements were made with a spectrum analyzer as the receiver.

  11. Test Results delta gain = 2.4 dB

  12. A new antenna test range on 40 m

  13. Antenna under test

  14. Test antenna with sliding height base

  15. Adding radials to the base

  16. Elevated radials

  17. Elevated radials close-up

  18. Loop receiving antenna

  19. Receiving antenna at 40’ N7MQ holding up the mast!

  20. Network analyzers note, automatic, organic, heating system Homebrew N2PK HP3577A with S-box

  21. Inside the N2PK VNA

  22. Test antennas • A 1/4-wave 40m tubing vertical. • An 1/8-wave 40m tubing vertical with top loading. • An 1/8-wave 40m tubing vertical resonated with a base inductor. • A 40 m Hamstick mobile whip. • 40m SteppIR vertical

  23. 1/8-wave, top-loaded, 40 m vertical

  24. What about a few elevated radials versus a large number of surface radials?

  25. NEC modeling prediction

  26. NEC predictions • There will be a very rapid change in peak gain as we raise the base of the antenna and the radials above ground. • Lifting the radials only a few inches makes a substantial difference. • When the base of the antenna and the radials have been elevated several feet, the peak signal will be very close to that for a large number of buried radials.

  27. Experiment 3 • I began with sixty four 33’ wire radials lying on the ground surface. • The length of the vertical was adjusted to be resonant at 7.2 MHz. • I removed the radials in the sequence 64, 32, 16, 8, 4, measuring S21 as I went. • With only 4 radials left I then raised the radials and the base of the antenna above ground incrementally measuring S21 at each height. • There were no ground stakes and the feedline was isolated with a choke.

  28. 4-64 radials lying on ground surface 5.8 dB

  29. 4 radials raised above ground 5.9 dB

  30. NEC modeling predicts that four elevated radials will perform as well as 64 radials lying on the ground. • In this example, measurements show no significant difference in signal strength between 64 radials lying on the ground and 4 radials at 4’!

  31. Some more elevated radial experiments

  32. Gullwing radials a la N6BV

  33. Variations in elevated radials

  34. comment on four elevated radials • From these experiments and NEC predictions it would seem that four elevated radials are all you need. • That’s deceiving! Antennas with only a few elevated radials suffer from a number of problems: • hi-Q, radials tune the vertical • asymmetric currents in the radials leading to pattern asymmetry. • tuning and current symmetry are very sensitive to ground and mechanical variations as well as nearby conductors.

  35. More on elevated radials • Use more than 4 elevated radials : • the Q and radial current asymmetries decrease. • tuning is less sensitive • the reactive part of the feed-point impedance changes more slowly as you add radials so you have a better SWR bandwidth. • however, the ground loss does not improve much.

  36. Some experiments with radials lying on the ground surface

  37. Measured improvement over a single ground stake f=7.2 MHz

  38. Caution! • Your mileage may vary! • My soil is pretty good but for poorer soils expect more improvement with more radials. • The degree of improvement will also depend on the frequency: • soil characteristics change with frequency, • at a given distance in wavelengths the field intensity increases with frequency.

  39. Measured base impedances

  40. Antenna resonance versus radial number

  41. Radial current for different heights

  42. A current sensor

  43. Radial current measurements

  44. Measured current distribution on a radial

  45. Radial current distribution

  46. NEC modeling prediction

  47. Lets do an experiment: • isolate the base of the antenna with a common mode choke (a balun). • lay out sixty four 33’ radials and adjust the vertical height to resonance (reference height). • remove all but four of the radials • Measure S21 with the reference height. • Measure S21 with the vertical shortened to re-resonate. • Measure S21 with the reference height as we shorten the radials.

  48. Effect of shorting radials, constant height

  49. Radial current distribution

  50. The lesson here! • When you have only a few radials lying on the ground you can have much higher losses than expected! • These losses can be reduced by shortening the radial lengths, i.e. less copper = less loss.

More Related