1 / 37

Impact of Pharmaceutical Regulation on Drug Launch Strategies

Explore how drug launch and pricing are influenced by pharmaceutical regulation, analyzing factors affecting launch delay, pricing conditions, and welfare effects of internal and external referencing on launch strategies.

guytonj
Download Presentation

Impact of Pharmaceutical Regulation on Drug Launch Strategies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Patricia M. Danzon The Wharton School University of Pennsylvania danzon@wharton.upenn.edu Andrew J. Epstein Yale University andrew.epstein@yale.edu Effects of Regulation on Drug Launch and Pricing

  2. Characteristics of On-patent Medicines • High R&D cost  patents are essential • Most medicines are potentially global • ∑ ∑(Pjt – MCjt) > F t j • Price-MC margin, across countries and patent life, must pay for R&D • Ramsey pricing  optimal cross-national price differentials • Prices should vary inversely with “true” price elasticity • (Danzon and Towse, 2004) • GDP per capita may be a rough proxy • Insurance undermines consumer price sensitivity  increased prices and volumes •  Third party payers act as cost-conscious surrogates

  3. Regulation of Pharmaceuticals • 1. Registration and Market Access • Proof of safety, efficacy and quality • 1990s EMEA and US FDA harmonized requirements and accelerated procedures • Japan has unique requirements • 2. Price and Reimbursement Regulation • Price approval a condition of reimbursement in most countries • Country-specific rules are heterogeneous and complex

  4. Price Regulation in Practice: Two Prototypes • Internal referencing to other products withinclass/country • Mark-ups for superior efficacy; pharmacoeconomic data may be required • Japan; France; Sweden; Canada etc. • Cost-effectiveness a condition for reimbursement (>1999 UK, Canada) • Therapeutic reference price reimbursement: RP = max. reimbursement for all drugs in a therapeutic group • Netherlands (1991); Germany (2005) • Generic RP within off-patent molecules, widely used but unlikely to affect launch • External referencing to same product in other countries • P j,n = min/ mean/ median {Pk,n……. Ps,n} • External benchmark  less discretion for regulators • Netherlands, Japan, Italy, Portugal, Greece, Canada, France • Informally used in many other countries e.g. UK, US

  5. Price Regulation Affects a Firm’s Incentives for Launch of New Drugs • Direct Effects • Lower prices  lower NPV of sales vs. fixed launch cost • Non-launch most likely in countries/classes with small volume • Strategic delay • Firms may hold out for higher price; converse for regulators • Indirect Effects • Market segmentation and price discrimination constrained • Optimal strategy: delay or not launch in low price countries that may undermine potentially higher prices in connected markets • Parallel trade has same effects as external referencing • Limited to traded share of sales

  6. Welfare Effects Differ by Type of Regulation • Internal referencing • Regulators should weigh benefit of lower prices against reduced access to new drugs • Cost and benefits are internalized to the regulating country • External referencing • Referencing by high-price country to low-price country  launch delay and/or higher prices in low-price country • Spillover costs in low-price country are not internalized to high-price country • Undermines Ramsey-optimal price differentials

  7. Study Objectives: Determinants of Launch Delay and Launch Prices • Effects of regulation • Direct effect from lower prices • Spillover effects from external referencing and parallel trade • Strategic incentives to delay launch • Dynamic (between subclass) competition vs. Static (within subclass) competition • Local corporation effects • Uniform across countries? • Launch and/or price?

  8. Launch and Price Conditions Launch Condition  Firm’s Reservation Price (PAsk) Fixed Costs Spillover Costs Expected Net Revenue Launch and Price at Launch

  9. Reduced Form Equations Launch Price at Launch

  10. Data • IMS quarterly data on drug sales Q1 1992 – Q4 2003 • Revenue at manufacturer prices • Volume in IMS standard units (doses) • 15 Countries: • 4 High-price EU (Germany, UK, Netherlands, Sweden) • 5 Low-price EU (France, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Greece) • 4 High-price non-EU (US, Japan, Canada, Switzerland) • 2 Middle income (Brazil, Mexico) • 12 Therapeutic classes, all with new “superior” and old “inferior” subclasses • Anti-ulcerants: H2 antagonists vs. PPIs • Anti-depressants: TCAs vs. SSRI/SNRIs • “Superior”: 116 molecules; 885 launches in our period • “Inferior” : 259 molecules; 390 launches in our period

  11. Estimation (1): Launch Hazard (Quarterly) ML discrete-time proportional hazard model, based on complementary log-log regression • Accommodates: • Right censoring and late entry into risk set • Time-varying covariates • Robust s.e.’s for intra-molecule clustering • Alternative clog-log estimators: • -Split population model: lim(hazard) as time  infinity ≠ 1 • Random (molecule) effects: (Normal distribution) • Accounts for unobserved molecule heterogeneity

  12. Estimation (2): Price at Launch • Dependent variable: log price per standard unit • Local currencies adjusted to 2003 using local PPI • Converted to US dollars at 2003 exchange rates • Estimation • OLS with robust, clustered SEs or Normal random effects • Estimates conditional on launch • Clog-log 2-step Heckman estimator with consistent SEs • Unconditional estimates, adjusted for launch selection • In practice, identification mainly off functional form •  Focus on OLS results

  13. Number of Molecules Launched by a Local Corporation: Originators and Licensees

  14. Spillover Effects of Prior Foreign Launch on Launch Hazard in Low-Price EU Countries: Superior Subclasses

  15. GER is the referent

  16. GER is the referent

  17. Conclusions: 1. Regulation • Direct effect of price regulation is confirmed • Launch delay and non-launch more likely where expected launch prices are low • Indirect, spillover effects of regulation are significant • Spillover effects are greatest from high-price EU to low-price EU countries, in both launch and price • Referencing from high-price to low-price countries in the EU contributes to launch lags in these low price countries • Launch prices in low-price countries are also influenced by higher foreign prices • Parallel importation had smaller effects • Plausible, but power may be weak • Our data do not permit identification of PI source

  18. Conclusions: 2. Strategic Bargaining Delay? • No evidence that firms can obtain a higher price by delaying launch • Launch hazards decline with time from global launch • Launch prices (real) decline with time from global launch • But being first is not necessarily best • Second and third entrants in superior subclasses get higher real prices on average than first entrant

  19. Conclusions: 3. Dynamic vs. Static Competition • Launch lags and launch prices are related to prices of competitor products in the same subclass • Smaller cross-subclass effects • Other evidence supports dynamic competition • Late entrants in older subclasses diffuse less broadly • At lower prices, linked to prices in older subclasses • Generic prices not significant on average • Country-specific differences not tested

  20. Conclusions: 4. Local Corporation Effects • Launch by a local corporation increases launch hazard only in certain countries • Italy, Spain, France, Japan, Switzerland for superior drugs • Local corporation does not significantly affect price • Suggests local corporation benefit is in registration, not pricing • Future work to distinguish originator vs. licensee effects

  21. Conclusion: 5. Country Effects • Country effects are significant, after controlling for expected prices • Reflect all unmeasured country-specific effects • Within EU, potential parallel export countries have slower launch • Portugal, Italy, France, Spain, and Greece • But not consistently more negative than some other countries • Price effects are highly sensitive to control for GDP per capita • Controlling for GDP, low-price countries have relatively high prices • Controlling for GDP, high-price EU countries have relatively low prices • External referencing from high- to low-price countries contributes to launch lags and higher prices in low-price countries • If US adopts external referencing or parallel trade, spillover effects to other countries could be larger than within-EU effects here

  22. Launch and Molecule Count, and Mean and Median Launch Delay by Country and Subclass

More Related