1 / 4

Proxying in Federationland: A Proposal for Radical Privacy Preservation

This proposal introduces proxying in Federationland for accessing resources with traditional access control methods, allowing deep linking support and privacy preservation while addressing scalability and dependability challenges. This solution aims to be covered by REFEDS budget with proactive considerations for objections and community interest.

gwenm
Download Presentation

Proxying in Federationland: A Proposal for Radical Privacy Preservation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Proxying in Federationland • The obvious application • Access to resources with “old-fashioned” access control • Typically, IP-based • But others possible as well • And many others • Deep linking support (a.k.a. WAYFless URLs) • Federation-aware resolvers • Proxies at the provider • Radical privacy preservation

  2. A ProposalTo be covered by REFEDS budget

  3. Some Objections • Would this cover all the interesting use cases listed before? • Only the first one may not justify the effort • How are scalability and dependability issues to be addressed? • Single point of failure, heavy loads… • At least one IP per institution • Why a single, commercial product? • Is this of interest to the whole community?

  4. And Some Questions • Is this the only available product (in production level) for a given task? • Similar to SecureW2 in eduroam for Windows • Even if some of us don't use it, will its widespread use by others benefits the whole community? • Similar to Shibboleth • Is there an agreement with the product provider, so the community gets a better deal? • A-la-TCS • The answer to the first question is no • The answer to the second one could be affirmative if • Proxy-at-the-provider is an option • The interface is general enough to support other proxy SW • Shall we contact OCLC to see what happens with question three?

More Related