130 likes | 251 Views
OA-F Organisational Issues Working Group report. Final review of organisational issues. Intro.
E N D
OA-F Organisational Issues Working Group report Final review of organisational issues Paul Child
Intro • Leona Carpenter, with Donatella Castelli, Michael Day, Rachel Heery, Philip Hunter; Dennis Nicholson, William Nixon, Paul Child, Elizabeth Gadd, and a contribution on IPR by Mark Bide (Rightscom Limited) • This review explores the validity of the open archive approach through a close examination of organisational issues. It describes the approach and the Open Archives Initiative (OAI), and supports European organisations in benefiting from the added value of open archive technology by exploring the incentives for participation in an exchange-based model for providing information, archiving and metadata sharing services. A summary of Intellectual Property Right (IPR) issues related to open archives is included. Other topics covered are governance of the OAI, business models, content management, metadata issues and quality assurance. • This is the second of the two reports that are the contracted deliverables of Open Archives Forum Workpackage 3 'Organisational Validation'. Paul Child
Overview • Business Models • Intellectual Property Rights • Quality Assurance • Metadata • Interoperability • Content Management Systems • Importance of Organisational issues • Conclusions • Any Questions Paul Child
Business Models • What is a business model? • Why are business models important? • Business models and Public Organisations • Business models and Publicly Funded Projects. • Business models and the OA movement. Paul Child
Intellectual Property Rights • Defining Intellectual Property Right’s • An Infrastructure to support IPR on the network • Metadata and other types of content • Stakeholder attitudes • Implications for Open Archive Services Paul Child
Quality Assurance • What is quality? • ISO 8402 “the totality of the characteristics of an entity which bear on it’s ability to satisfy stated and implied needs” • Dimensions • Stakeholders • Quality dimensions • Who is responsible? Paul Child
Metadata • Best Practise Guidelines • Using simple Dublin Core to describe eprints • by Andy Powell, Michael Day and Peter CliffUKOLN, University of BathVersion 1.2 • http://www.rdn.ac.uk/projects/eprints-uk/docs/simpledc-guidelines/ • Metadata quality assurance Paul Child
Subject Interoperability • Guidelines • Well maintained subject or class scheme • Use without changes • Create rules for necessary changes • Harmonise changes with other repositories and scheme maintainers • Easy access to information and training • Provide users with a mapping to other schemes • Illustrations • http://renardus.lub.lu.se/ • http://infolab.kub.nl/prj/macs/ • http://hilt.cdlr.strath.ac.uk/ • http://speir.cdlr.strath.ac.uk/ Paul Child
Content Management Systems • Basic premise • A CMS can help co-ordinate a process that requires the skill and experience of staff based in a number of different areas of an institution. Examples include: • Step by step • Do different types of materials require different workflow ‘steps’ in a different order? For example, institutionally planned and executed course materials may start at one point in a work flow, whereas the creation of a research paper may start further on the flow. Paul Child
Collection Management and Development Policy Identification of requirement Identification of individual or group to be involved in creation Identification of creation schedule and plan Identification of constituent digital objects Bidding for funds Research Paper Electronic resource is created Metadata is created by resource creator Collection managers informed Checks: Research quality/Learning standards/Accuracy and currency of information Checks: Is metadata standard sufficient? Checks: Legal, clean, honest? Checks: IPR issues (risk, liability, protection) Security of information Checks: In line with institutional policies? Current awareness: which classes, students, academics need to know about it? Currency update cycle Commercial or Strategic Exploitation potential Archiving and preservation decisions Electronic publication decision(s) Permissions? Institution Planning Paul Child
Conclusions Paul Child