140 likes | 174 Views
Learn the importance of generating credible data, accessing datasets, and avoiding data misuse in policy analysis. Understand the challenges and solutions in data processing, analysis, and interpretation.
E N D
Making Sense of Data for Policy Analysis Professor Daniel Tevera Department of Geography, Environmental Studies and Tourism University of the Western Cape ISIbalo Conference 2016 St. George Hotel, Pretoria
Overview • Research should generate credible data • Data process • Why making sense of data can be difficult • Cases: 1-3 • Using graphics
Research should generate credible data • Research should aim to collect credible data that is valid and reliable. • Gaining access is vital for effective data collection. The researcher should consider how he/she will gain: - access to people - access to datasets - access to documents
https://www.google.com/fusiontables/DataSource?docid=1mUVUyAhPJBHKq_Qe1isxE7_XbjSjjGDCR7htM58https://www.google.com/fusiontables/DataSource?docid=1mUVUyAhPJBHKq_Qe1isxE7_XbjSjjGDCR7htM58
Data analysis Data analysis (whether qualitative or quantitative data) consists of: • Description and summary of the data • Identification of relationships between variables • Comparison of variables • Identification of the differences between variables • Forecasting outcomes
What is the difference between analysis and interpretation? • Analysis: is about describing data with tables, graphs, or narrative; transforming data into information • Interpretation: is about adding meaning to information by making connections and comparisons and by exploring causes and consequences
Why making sense of data can be difficult Reasons why: • Irregular data process • Ambiguities around variables, terminology and unit of analysis • Research design problems • Data organization/presentation problems • Data analysis and interpretation problems • The gap between producers and users of research is wide
Irregular data process Characterised by: • Vague research question • Poor quality data (e.g.. not cleaned) • Data organization/presentation problems • Data is analysed but is not interpreted
Ambiguities around research variables, terminology and unit of analysis Research variables • Confusion around dependent (response) and independent (predictor or explanatory) variables . • Independent variable is the predictor or explanatory variable • Dependent variable is the responsive variable. Terminology • Often household and family are used interchangeably Unit of analysis (level at which data will be collected) • Individuals or household?
Research design and data collection problems • Not knowing when the research design should be longitudinal, cross-sectional (survey), experimental (a typical scientific experiment), after-only design (e.g. Studies of floods), before-after design. • The sampling procedure is not explained or the standard procedures are not followed. (e.g. Is it going to be probability or non-probability sampling? Random or snowball sampling?). Terms are not explained. • Sample size is not given. • Research ethics procedures are not followed.
Data misuse arising from presentation errors • Misleading averages • Meaningless percentages • Overgeneralisation • Data dredging/selective presentation of data • Inappropriate comparisons • Misleading charts
Data misuse arising from inappropriate analysis • The purpose of analysing data is to obtain usable and useful information. • However, at times wrong conclusions are drawn from inconclusive thereby resulting in: • Sample errors • Presentation errors • Extrapolating the trend
Academic research and policy-makers • Research evidence is appealing to policy-makers if it: • addresses questions of interest to policy-makers • Is accessible • provides solutions to problems • is valid, reliable and scientifically rigorous