1 / 6

JI Project Cycle Status and observations

JI Project Cycle Status and observations. Morten Prehn Sorensen FIRST SDM JOINT COORDINATION WORKSHOP Maritim Hotel Bonn, Germany 24 - 25 March 2012. Increasing project stream - procedures work. Overall the JI procedures and guidelines work well

hachi
Download Presentation

JI Project Cycle Status and observations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. JI Project CycleStatus and observations Morten Prehn Sorensen FIRST SDM JOINT COORDINATION WORKSHOP MaritimHotel Bonn, Germany 24 - 25 March 2012

  2. Increasing project stream - procedures work • Overall the JI procedures and guidelines work well • Projects are progressing in more balanced way through the two tracks • T1/T2 choiceappear more nuanced due to new feestructure and external events • Examples of recent amendmentsbeingimplementedinclude: • Clarifications to guidelines for baseline setting and monitoring • Appraisalson all determinations and verifications

  3. A flexible yet demanding mechanism • JI is contrary to the CDM case law oriented: • Methodologies and approaches are established together with project determination • In CDM methodologies are pre-approved • The case law oriented process is more demanding and not a simple tick-the-box exercise: • Different interpretations can occur between AIEs and even between individuals within the same AIE • Two appraisals of the same determination/verification can turn out quite differently • Flexibility both a blessing and a curse!

  4. Example: Comparable cases • Guidance on Criteria for Baseline Setting and Monitoring ver. 3 endorsed by JISC 26: • Clarifies that approaches used in comparable JI cases can be applied subject to specific conditions • Approaches accepted by one AIE and deemed final by JISC may not be accepted by another AIE • Projects can as a result be locked up for long time periods • An appeal procedure could improve on this shortcoming and contribute to more consistency

  5. Appraisals: Experience and observations • Procedures for appraisals amended at JISC 25 • Two experts review every determination and verification under track 2 in non-public appraisals • (Potentially) adds technical expertice and hands-on experience to the project assessment of the JISC • Appraisals may however have shortcomings • Can differ between experts and between period verifications • Proper review usually require more time than a one day budget • A random sample process with fewer and more thorough appraisal that are shared more widely • May improve efficiency and quality • Be more manageable and appropriate in a JI with unified tracks

  6. Thankyoufor your attention

More Related