100 likes | 221 Views
Capitol Hill Briefing Dec 11, 2013 Superconducting Particle Accelerator Forum of America Kenneth O. Olsen. SPAFOA Mission.
E N D
Capitol Hill BriefingDec 11, 2013Superconducting Particle Accelerator Forum of AmericaKenneth O. Olsen
SPAFOA Mission “The SPAFOA provides a formal network for its industry members with common business interests to interact with government funded accelerator R&D and siting of large accelerator projects” • Tech Transfer: Enhance US industry’s communications with DOE, labs, and universities to incorporate industry in RD&D as a early partner. Enhance US industrial capability in accelerator technology) • Fair Procurement Policies: Promoting Government procurement policies that level the playing field for US suppliers (US jobs with US dollars) • Accelerator Stewardship: Assist DOE Office of Science Accelerator Stewardship Program activities by providing input on R&D needs and applications. Attend workshops and participate in reports as appropriate. • Congressional Liaison: Communicate issues that foster the growth of industrial capability and jobs with the Congress
SPAFOA Evolution • Chartered in 2005 as a 501 (c) 6 not for profit DC corporation titled the “Linear Collider Forum of the Americas” (LCFOA) • Reorganized in 2008 to the Superconducting Particle Accelerator Forum of the Americas (SPAFOA) • Renamed in 2012 to the Superconducting Particle Accelerator Forum of America to reflect 100% US industry membership • Current membership totals 25 ~75% small high tech businesses in 14 States • Advocate for the US “Industrialization” in advanced accelerator programs
Two Facets of the Accelerator Industry • “Low” Energy (Commercial Customers) “High” Energy (Government Customers) • Evolutionary market • 10% annual growth • >10,000 in 1992; >30,000 now • >6,000 in medical applications • Multiple suppliers for major market segments • Each facility different design • Gov’t, university and industry users • SC technology showing dominance • No near term significant commercial market A few companies are in both facets
Current Major Accelerator Markets Ref: R. Hamm “xxx” Manufacturers literature IAEA
Future Accelerator Markets High Energy-SCRF Technology: • Discovery Science: FRIB, LCLS II, ILC • Security: Weapon countermeasures • Environmental: Major waste treatment facilities Key: Strong competitive US industrial base, level international competitive playing field, R&D partnerships with national labs and universities Low Energy- E-Beam Technology: • Food sterilization • Air and water pollution treatment • Industrial processes Key: Lower accelerator costs and increased reliability. Demos to prove regulatory compliance; public acceptance of technology
US Industrialization • SCRF Cavities for SNS and CBEAF were purchased from Europe • Since then US industry has produced X prototypes of ILC cavities • DOE, thru Fermilab, has invested over $50M in SCRF R&D and procurements with US industry over the past 10 years • US industry now has a least 2 qualified suppliers for all major SCRF accelerator components • US industry was excluded from the 560 XFEL cavity procurements , enabling EU industry to invest in significant tooling for future competitions • Industrialization provides the foundation for our industry to grow, pay taxes, and train and provide jobs for high tech. manufacturing workers
US Industrialization A strong US industrial base for high energy accelerators provides: • Continuous support of DOE SC • Growth into other Government markets (some classified) • Foundation for US participation in ILC However the playing field is tilted against us unless: • DOE limits future accelerator hardware contracts to US industry with an exemption to FAR 6.3 • US Congress enacts legislation limiting competition to US companies and/or • Laboratory procurements require US only competition for strategic reasons such as National security or maintaining capability to partner in international programs such as the ILC
Briefing Objectives • Update from DOE Office of Science • Progress on accelerator stewardship • Congressional perspectives • Future applications • Industrialization progress and issues