660 likes | 813 Views
Formative Assessment Institute. Barb Rowenhorst Jennifer Nehl Jackie Jessop Rising Pam Lange. http://fai.tie.wikispaces.net/. Credit Options. Remember to sign in each day PTBS Credit Graduate Credit – University of Wyoming. Outcomes.
E N D
Formative Assessment Institute Barb Rowenhorst Jennifer Nehl Jackie Jessop Rising Pam Lange
Credit Options Remember to sign in each day • PTBS Credit • Graduate Credit – University of Wyoming
Outcomes • To share successes and challenges of assessment implementation. • To create criteria for rubric development. • To evaluate and develop rubrics. • To use technology for rubric development.
Agenda • Welcome • Homework sharing • Creating rubric criteria • Developing rubrics • Technology integration • Closure
Norms • Honor Private Think Time • Allow time for individual reflection in order to be concise with our comments • Allow for a variety of think time • Own Responsibility • Be punctual (Start on time, end on time) • Maintain focus (Minimize sidebar conversation) • Share Air Time • Share information • Respect the signal to refocus
Homework PresentationsShare successes & challenges of assessment implementation. Pam
Review Homework Presentation Review with team: • 5 minute discussion at your table • Challenges • Successes • If you could make one suggestion, what would it be?
Structure for Discussion • Protocol “Save the Last Word for Me” • Homework Discussion Guide • You will be given extra time to fill this portion out. • Discuss time limits – important Facilitator and Timekeeper
First Round First Round Grouping • 4 to a group • Different schools per group Three minutes to group
Five Minute Reflection Homework Discussion Guide (bottom) Individually, take five minutes and reflect on the information you have learned. Ideas: • What might you like to report back to your team? • Suggestions for your district • Ideas that you might use in your position
Second Round First Round Grouping • 4 to a group • Different schools per group Three minutes to group
Ten Minute Reflection/Break Take a few minutes and reflect on the information you have learned. • Report back to your team • Suggestions for your district • Ideas that you might use Chalk Talk • Write one assessment suggestion you think that everyone needs to know.
“Show us what good work looks like and what we have to do to get there.” 8-year-old student
Analyzing Student Work • Provide clear and understandable expectations • Provide examples of strong and weak student work • Post strong student work on the classroom wall for students to use as a guide
Analyzing Student WorkRound #1: Social Studies • Independently, review each social studies student work. (A-O). • Sort the work into piles of “Advanced,” “Proficient,” and “Basic/Below Basic.” • As you sort, takes notes of your thinking to remind you how that rating was determined.
Analyzing Student WorkRound #2: Social Studies • As a team… • Come to consensus on what constitutes “Advanced,” “Proficient,” and “Basic/Below Basic” student work on this assignment. • Develop agreed-upon criteria for each rating.
Analyzing Student WorkCharts: Social Studies Advanced Proficient Basic/Below Basic
Analyzing Student WorkRound #1: Science • Independently, review each social studies student work. (A-O). • Sort the work into piles of “Advanced,” “Proficient,” and “Basic/Below Basic.” • As you sort, takes notes of your thinking to remind you how that rating was determined.
Analyzing Student WorkRound #2: Science • As a team… • Come to consensus on what constitutes “Advanced,” “Proficient,” and “Basic/Below Basic” student work on this assignment. • Develop agreed-upon criteria for each rating.
Analyzing Student WorkCharts: Science Advanced Proficient Basic/Below Basic
Analyzing Student Work What might be some ways we can begin the process of ensuring there is consistency within: • departments? • grade levels? • content areas? • building? • district?
Making clear decisions about your criteria before you begin to grade papers will help make the grading process quick, fair, and accurate. Using a version of your criteria as a cover sheet can help you score the paper and provide useful feedback to the student at the same time.
Assessment For Learning • The story of Emily emphasizes that if assessment is going to be a tool FOR learning, students need to know: • Where they are going. • Where they are now. • How to close the gap
Steps in Rubric Developmentwith Past Student Work Step 1: Establish a knowledge base Step 2: Gather samples of student performance Step 3: Sort student work by level of quality Step 4: Cluster the reasons into traits Step 5: Identify sample performance that illustrate each level Step 6: Make it better!! Stiggens, Arter, Chappius, Chappius
What makes a good rubric? • Performance Criteria • Qualities of a good rubric • Assessment for and of learning Stiggens, Arter, Chappius,Chappius
Performance Criteria of a Good Rubric • Defines quality for teachers • Describes quality for students • Judgments are more objective, consistent, and accurate • Focus teaching • Use of the rubric influences the design • Track student learning (Formative Assessment!!!) (Page 200, Doing it Right, Doing it Well)
Qualities of a Good Rubric • Available in student-friendly version • Define various levels of success • Aligns to standards • Consistent language • Contains descriptive detail • Not negative at the ‘low’ end • Include only those aspects of a performance or product that are most valued. (Page 201, Doing it Right, Doing it Well)
R4R (Rubric for Rubrics) • Insert snapshot of R4R
Rubrics Samples • Snap shot of sample number 1 rubric
Looking at Sample Rubrics • Look at R4R. • Based on what we’ve discussed, review the sample rubrics. • Determine which rubrics are effective and which are weak. • You will have 20-30 minutes. • (approximately 10 minutes per rubric) • Be prepared to discuss your findings.
Looking at Sample Rubrics • As a group, determine a rubric rating for each of the four traits listed on the R4R. • Ready to Roll • On its Way • Not Ready • As a group, agree upon an overall rating for the whole rubric. • Ready to Roll • On its Way • Not Ready
Looking at Sample Rubrics • What did you find? • Sample #3 • Sample #2 • Sample #1
Steps in Rubric Development(Using past student work) Step 1: Establish a knowledge base Step 2: Gather samples of student performance Step 3: Sort student work by level of quality Step 4: Cluster the reasons into traits Step 5: Identify sample performance that illustrate each level Step 6: Make it better!!
Steps in Rubric Development(Using past student work) • Look at your criteria from Social Studies assessments. • Review the qualities and criteria for good rubrics (200-201). • Identify the learning targets, qualities, standards, benchmarks, etc. that will be assessed. • Choose the learning targets, qualities, standards, benchmarks, etc. that will be assessed as your proficient. This column gives the assessor a standard to work from. • What would an advanced look like? • What would basic look like? • Maintain consistent vocabulary, terminology, and criteria throughout traits.
Social Studies Rubric Development using Rubistar http://rubistar.4teachers.org/index.php Jackie Jessop Rising
Steps in Rubric Development(Using past student work) • Take your proficient criteria from the Social Studies assessment and write it in the Proficient column. • “Your description should include information about three of the following areas: religion, individual rights, type of government, climate, use of technology, geography.” What is proficient? • These will be the working ‘baseline’. This should be aligned directly to the state benchmarks, learning targets, performance descriptors, etc. • We will write the advanced, basic and below basic criteria from the proficient column. • What does the Basic criteria look like according to the Proficient column? The Below Basic? The Advanced?