910 likes | 2.37k Views
Intracranial pressure methods of monitoring and effect of anesthetic agents and techniques. Dr. Nitish parmar. University College of Medical Sciences & GTB Hospital, Delhi. Overview. introduction Clinical importance of ICP measurement Indications of ICP measurement Ideal ICP monitor
E N D
Intracranial pressuremethods of monitoringandeffect of anesthetic agents and techniques Dr. Nitishparmar University College of Medical Sciences & GTB Hospital, Delhi
Overview • introduction • Clinical importance of ICP measurement • Indications of ICP measurement • Ideal ICP monitor • Individual ICP monitors: merits and demerits • Complications of ICP monitoring • ICP waveforms and their interpretation • Effects of anaesthetic agents on ICP
Introduction Assessment of brain function in conscious patient relatively easy One of the most reliable tool of monitoring of deterioration of brain function in unconscious neurosurgical patient is the measurement of ICP Recent audit shows twofold reduction in mortality brain trauma patient in centers where ICP is monitored
Normal ICP Adults and young children =10-15mmHg Young children =3-7 mmHg Infants =1.5-6mmHg • Raised ICP 20-30 mmHg = mild risk of herniation 30-50mmHg =moderate >50mmHg =severe (herniation) Temporal mass lesion may herniate even at 20 mmHg
Monroe Kellie doctrine • skull is a rigid compartment that contains 3 component • Brain tissue • Blood • CSF • Balance in state of dynamic equilibrium
Volume pressure response • Measure of compliance • Measures the change in ICP that occurs after adding or withdrawing 1ml of CSF • Normal< 2mmHg/ml • VPR> 5mmHg/ml suggests severe reduction in compliance
Pressure volume index • Pressure volume index (PVI): volume of fluid to be added to the CSF to raise the ICP 10 times the baseline. • Normal=26±4 ml • Used as a measure of compliance • Significant reduction in compliance when PVI< 13ml
Clinical importance of ICP measurement • Raised ICP may impede CBF and may result in cerebral ischemia • Raised ICP may lead to cerebral herniation. • Raised ICP is an important secondary insult in brain injured patient and a predictor of poor outcome • ICP is used to calculate CPP(MAP-ICP) which is used as therapeutic target in neuro ICU’s
Indications • Severe head injury (GCS 3-8) • Abnormal CT • Normal CT but age >40 or SBP <90 or abnormal motor posturing • Moderate head injury (GCS 9-12) • If anaesthetized or deeply sedated • Abnormal CT • SAH- associated with hydrocephalus • Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage • Brain tumor- in pt. deemed at high risk of swelling or obstructive hydrocephalus eg. Post. Fossa surgery • Benign intracranial hypertension • Reye’s syndrome
Before measuring….. • ICP is not evenly distributed in all pathological states– compartmentalization is very common. • ICP varies over time: averaging for at least 30 minutes is needed to calculate mean ICP • Patient supine and avoid movement and speaking during measurement • Overnight monitoring during natural sleep regarded as gold standard in conscious patient.
Choice of monitoring systems will depend on experience of the surgeon, the available equipment and the particular circumstances of each case • Pre procedure consent, image of brain and CSF space, coagulation studies and their correction
Ideal ICP monitor • Accurate over a large pressure range • Reliable over time- minimal drift • Minimal patient morbidity- infection, hemorrhage, trauma to the brain tissue • Allows waveform analysis • Easy to insert and read • Cost effective
methods • Invasive • Intraventricular • Intraparenchymal • Subdural / extradural • Subarachnoid • Non invasive • Clinical • CT • Transcranialdoppler • Tympanic membrane displacement • Scalp blood flow • ophthalmodynamometry
Intraventricular catheters • AKA external ventricular drainage (EVD), connected to an external pressure transducer via fluid-filled tubing. • Gold standard • Requires placement of catheter into lateral ventricles. Usually the non dominant hemisphere is chosen. The reference point for external transducer is foramen of Monroe.(external auditory meatus) • Advantages • Accurate ICP measurement • Access to CSF for drainage • Access to CSF for instilling contrast media/medication • Reliable evaluation of intracranial compliance
Disadvantages • Inc. risk of infection • Requires frequent recalibration • Insertion difficult if ventricles are small compressed or displaced • Inc. risk of CSF leak
Intraparenchymal • Next most suitable alternative to intraventricular catheters • Two types • Fibre-optic (camino) : change in light intensity is interpreted in terms of pressure • Microchip transducer (codman) : solid state pressure transducer • Advantages • Requires zeroing only once • Less chances of infection • Less chances of CSF leak
Disadvantages • Provides no access to CSF • Cannot be recalibrated after placement • Requires periodic replacement d/t drift
Subarachnoid bolt or screw • Advantages • Associated with lower infection rates than ventriculostomy • Quickly and easily placed • Can be used in small and collapsed ventricles • Requires no penetration of brain tissue • Disadvantages • Potential for dampened waveform • Less accurate at high ICP levels • Frequent recaliberation is required • No CSF acccess
Subdural/epidural catheter • Usually used in the setting of elective craniotomy or for hepatic encephalopathy. • Advantages • Least invasive • Low risk of infection • Easily and quickly placed • Disadvantages • Inc. baseline drift • Accuracy of placement very crucial • Less accurate • No access to csf • expensive
Non-invasive • Clinical • Early findings • Dec level of consciousness • Changes in mental state • Confusion • Lethargy • seizures • Abnormal eye examination • Sluggish pupillary response • Papilloedema • Cranial nerve deficiet • Late findings • Continued dec in level of consciousness • Stupor • Coma • Headache-especially in the early morning
Hemiplegia • Vomiting without nausea • Decorticate(flexion)/decerebrate(extensor) posturing • Brain stem pressure signs • Loss of protective reflexes- gag, cough, corneal reflex • Cushing triad- hypertension bradycardia irregular respiration • Cheyne stokes respiration • In infants • Suturaldiastesis • Bulging fontanelle (especially lambdoid) • Poor feeding • Upgaze paresis
CT scan: • May reveal mass • Hydrocephalus • Cerebral edema: compressed ventricle and midline shift.
Transcranial doppler • Principle: a shift in frequency of a wave when either the transmitter or receiver of the wave is moving with respect to the wave propagating medium. • Sound emanating from or reflected by an object moving towards the observer will have a higher frequency and vice-versa • The recorded dimension is velocity and not flow per se but proportionality does exist b/w velocity and flow when the arterial diameter remains constant
Advantages • Bedside • Non-invasive • Continuous • Disadvantages • Changes in velocity may reflect low flow or arterial vasoconstriction
Tympanic membrane displacement • ICP transmitted to perilymphatic fluid via cochlear aqueduct and can be assessed indirectly by recording tympanic membrane displacement during stapedial reflex • High pressure- greater medial motion • Low pressure- lesser medial motion • Advantages • Non invasive • Easily measured on a sequential basis
Disadvantages • Doubtful patency of cochlear aqueduct in elderly • Requires skilled audiologist • Does not give actual value of ICP • Inaccurate
Scalp blood flow: bears inverse relationship with ICP • Ophthalmodynamometry: central vein pressure and ICP have good corelation • Useful tool in suspected raised ICP
Complications of ICP monitoring CSF infection(0.5-5%) Hemorrhage(1-2%) Cerebral injury(1%) Invalid reading(5-10%) siezures Removal after seven days Correct coagulation defects before placing and removing Correct landmarks. Depth<6 cm Re-zero, drift resistant strain gauges Use anticonvulsants for duration of monitor
Analysis of intracranial pressure wave ICP recordings have two component • baseline pressure • pressure waves • Synchronous with arterial pulse • Synchronous with respiration • As the ICP increases the amplitude of the cardiac pulse component increases whereas that of the respiratory component decreases • These changes reflect altered intracranial compliance long before changes in intracranial pressure
The arterial pressure wave consists of further sub waves • Normally P1>P2 • Inc in P2 above P1 suggests decreasing intracranial compliance even before any actual rise in the intracranial pressure e.g. fulminant hepatic failure
Pathological waveforms • Lundberg identified three different types of ICP variations • A waves • Severe pathological waves seen d/t regional alteration in CBV • Rises above 40-50 mmhg and sustained for 5-20 min before coming to baseline • Progressively even the baseline gets elevated • Associated with clinical deterioration • Headache, vomiting, LOC, altered pupillary response may be seen during these episodes
B waves • Have an amplitude of 20 mmhg and occurs @ 1-2/min • Warning signs of decreased intracranial compliance and impending elevation of intracranial pressure • B waves most commonly occur synchronously with cheyne stokes respiration • C waves • Small rhythmic oscillations of 20mmhg occurring at a frequency of 4-8/min and is of doubtful significance
Effect of anesthetic agent on ICP • Important factors effecting ICP • Cerebral blood flow • Ph • Pco2 • Po2 • CSF dynamics • CBV and not CBF is the most important factor influencing ICP. • Generally parallel correlation between CBF and CBV except ischemia caused by hypotension or vessel occlusion. • Also no 1:1 relation • Practically very difficult to measure CBV.
Intravenous induction agents • Barbiturates • Dose dependent decrease in cmro2 and CBF leading to a decrease in CBV and thus ICP • High doses of thiopentone causes a decrease in CSF formation (Vf) and either no change or decrease in resistance to CSF absorption (Ra) with a predicted dec. in ICP • Auto regulation and co2 responsiveness is maintained • Propofol • Dose dependent decrease in cmro2 and CBF leading to a decrease in CBV and thus ICP • Propofol causes no change in CSF dynamics • Auto regulation and co2 responsiveness is maintained • Antinausea effect of propofol may also be beneficial
Etomidate • Dose dependent decrease in cmro2 and CBF leading to a decrease in CBV and thus ICP • High doses of etomidate causes a decrease in CSF formation (Vf) and either no change or decrease in resistance to CSF absorption (Ra) with a predicted dec. in ICP • Auto regulation and co2 responsiveness is maintained • Reduces ICP without decreasing CPP • Ketamine • Inc. in CBF and cmro2 leading to inc. in CBV and thus ICP • Inc. Ra and no change in Vf with predicted inc. in ICP • Auto regulation and co2 responsiveness is maintained
Narcotics • In clinically used dosage no effect on CBF/cmro2 in an un-stimulated nervous system • Higher dosage may cause reduction in both • Substantial reduction may be obtained in highly aroused patients suffering from pain • In cases where pt. is spontaneously breathing inc. in ICP d/t respiratory depression and co2 retention • Morphine in large doses may cause histamine release and inc. in CBV/ICP • At low doses fentanyl, alfentanyl, sufentanyl, remifentanyl no change in Vf and a dec in Ra with predicted dec in ICP.
At high doses sufentanyl causes no change in Vf and either no change or inc. in Ra predicting no change or inc. in ICP. • Some reports have also suggested dec. in MAP leading to cerebral vasodilation as a cause of sufentanyl induced rise in ICP
Benzodiazepines • Small dec. in CBF/cmro2 • Uncertain effects on CSF dynamics • ICP effects are small with either no change or slight reduction in ICP
Volatile anaesthetic agents • All volatile anaesthetic agents supress cerebral metabolism (cmro2 dec.) in dose related manner • All have intrinsic vasodilatory effect • Halothane>>enflurane>desflurane=isoflurane>sevoflurane • Net effect is the interplay of both factors • At 0.5 MAC---cmro2 induced dec in CBF predominates and ICP dec. • At 1.0 MAC---CBF remains unchanged so does ICP • At >1.0 MAC—vasodilatory effect predominates and ICP inc.