1 / 11

All Hazards Symbology Workshop

All Hazards Symbology Workshop. 2 December 2005 NSW Department of Lands Facilitated by ANZLIC. Workshop Outline. Defining the requirements - worse case scenarios Current situation Preferred scenario Options for moving forward Actions that we can do now Developing the project

hamlet
Download Presentation

All Hazards Symbology Workshop

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. All Hazards Symbology Workshop 2 December 2005 NSW Department of Lands Facilitated by ANZLIC

  2. Workshop Outline • Defining the requirements - worse case scenarios • Current situation • Preferred scenario • Options for moving forward • Actions that we can do now • Developing the project • Summary & next steps

  3. 1. Defining the requirements (Response) • Need to tie to existing operational systems. • Integrate with existing infrastructure symbols • Separate “Operational” symbology from others • Granularity of symbols + Fit-For-Purpose Symbology sets • User testing • Definitions E.g.. Staging Areas • Outreach and Promotion for general public • Joined up government • Strategic thinking leading to uptake

  4. 2. Current situation (Response) What are the problems, issues …etc • Symbology + software limitations • Scalability + National consistency • Cost effectiveness and divide between systems • Time and coordination of input at national scale • Training & immediacy of requirement • Adopt existing standards (ICSS) • Establish Buy-in + range of maturity of uptake. • Inter-sector > inter-jurisdiction. • Operational verses strategic + definition of common requirement. • Attribution context

  5. 3. Preferred scenario (Response) • CONSISTENT SET • Linking to International standards and a national catalog • Scale dependency • Hierarchical • Single attribution • INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS SPELT-OUT • Classification and transferability • Covering all stages from mitigation to relief and discovery (PPRR) • Stratified • TECHNOLOGY AND MEDIA INDEPENDENT • Classification and transferability • INTUITIVE • Simple and scalable • used for public and by public (eventually) • Colour (?), but clear in B&W. • GOVERNANCE, MAINTENANCE AND CUSTODIANSHIP • Dynamic

  6. 3. Preferred scenario (Response 2) Supports PPRR Transferability Single Attribution Hierarchical Info. Reqrmnt. Spelt out Stratified Classification Catalog Consistent Set International All Hazards Symbol Set Technology + Media Independent Scale Dependency Governance + Maintenance + Custodianship Intuitive Dynamic ISO International For General Public Use Simple + Scaleable

  7. 4. Options for moving forward (Response) Open Systems Road Show Process for change Quick wins Business case Publishing + Implementation Web Page Variety of Functional Areas Audit + Technology Mandate Catalog Differences Gap Analysis Interoperability All Hazards Symbol Set Open Systems User requirements Agree on Principles Template Work with Vendors Information Producta Outreach + Promotions Multi Formats General Symbology Bushfires General Public Government Agencies Design

  8. 4. Options for moving forward (Response 2) Governance Process National Endorsement New Funding Or Pooled Existing Resourced Lead Agency Maintenance Custodianship International Standards ANZLIC Australasian National Body 3 Communi- cation 1 Operational 2 Technical Thematic Working Group

  9. Governance Process AEMC Etc.. National Endorsement New Funding Or Pooled Existing CIP NCTC Resourced ANZLIC EMA Lead Agency NIMAG ? Maintenance Custodianship International Standards ANZLIC ALGA, ICSM, EMSINA Australasian All Hazards Symbology Working Group Australasian National Body 3 Communi- cation 1 Operational 2 Technical Thematic Working Group

  10. } Joint Developing the project NCTC, AEMC, CIP, First Police AFAC, NSINS, AGSINS ACSES Project Sponsors: • ANZLIC • EMA Project Manager: • ICSM ($$) Contributors: • EMSINA (Content Expert) • ICSM (Standards & outreach) Defence + BoM + GA + Biosecurity NZ Fire, ALGA, NSW Symbology Working Group + Others Timelines: Reporting: • Summary of workshop (Feb 06) + Paper (ANZLIC / ICSM)

  11. Developing the project (Continued) • Resourcing: • Consultant – Audit (ICSM $$) • Meeting of the working Group • Terms of Reference • Timeline • Granting options: • Develop proposal with EMA • Next Step: • Presentation for NIMAG (ANZLIC, achieved). • Prepare a report from the meeting and circulation in Jan 06 (ANZLIC/ICSM). • Arrange meeting of the National body in Feb 2006 to develop a project plan & specification of requirements for the consultant.

More Related