270 likes | 435 Views
LCLS Project Transition to Operations 14 May 2008. Handover, Endgame Operations Organization Staffing Budget Schedule Experiment Program Science Advisory Committee User access policy User Outreach User Organization, Executive Committee User Proposal Preparation Workshops
E N D
LCLS Project Transition to Operations 14 May 2008 Handover, Endgame Operations Organization Staffing Budget Schedule Experiment Program Science Advisory Committee User access policy User Outreach User Organization, Executive Committee User Proposal Preparation Workshops Joint SSRL-LCLS User Meeting Proposal support/processing
Transition to Operations: Commissioning • Ground rules for transfer of accelerator systems from LCLS to ASD were defined in Lab Director’s memo, 12/2006 • ASD SOP for control of accelerator configuration implemented from start of commissioning • Staged handover of accelerator systems to Accelerator Systems Division at start of commissioning • Injector + BC-1 • Commissioning: April 2007 start, November 2007 finish • + Linac through Sector 30 • Commissioning: January 2008 start, April 2008 finish • + Beam Transport through Undulator and Beam Dump • January 2009 start, July 2009 finish • Safety Assessment and Readiness planning underway
Transition to Operation: X-Rays • Near Hall start of experiment program • July 2009 • Far Hall detection of x-rays (CD-4) • July 2010
Transition to Operations: Civil Construction • Beneficial Occupancy through Near Hall • May 2008 • Beneficial Occupancy through Far Hall • August 2008 • Weekly planning meetings underway
Operations Work Breakdown Structure • Project approach to • planning/scoping • budgeting • staffing • conduct of operations • improvements • definition and coordination of • matrixed resources
Budget • Accelerator operations budget and staffing • Presented for BES review in September 2006 • $96.7M proposed for FY2009 • Experiment operations budget request • FY2009: $ 2M • FY2010: $ 9M
Photon Operations Staffing • Details in John Arthur’s talk
Target Running Schedule – Operation Hours • 2009: AMO, SXR • 2010: AMO, SXR, XPP • 2011: AMO, SXR, XPP, CXI • 2012: AMO, SXR, XPP, CXI, XCS • HED?
Described in John Bozek’s talk LCLS LUSI LUSI LUSI Described in J. Hastings’ Talk Future - Beam Sharing • Soft x-ray experiments will require exclusive use of beam • Ability to split/share the “hard” x-ray beam with thin crystals
LCLS Science Program • LCLS Science Advisory Committee • LCLS Scientific Advisory Committee (SAC) Roger Falcone UC Berkeley, USA - Chair Massimo Altarelli European XFEL Project Phil Bucksbaum Stanford University Robert L. Byer Stanford University Hans Frauenfelder LANL Wayne Hendrickson Columbia UniversityTetsuya Ishikawa RIKEN Spring-8 Center Margaret Murnane University of Colorado-Boulder Francesco Sette ESRF, France Sunil Sinha UCSD Dietrich von der Linde University of EssenJustin Wark Oxford UniversityC. Lewis Cocke Kansas State UniversityRobert Schoenlein LBNL Philip Anfinrud NIH Geraldine Richmond University of Oregon, USA
LCLS/LUSI Instrument Teams • SAC recommended scientific thrust areas, based on letters of intent to do LCLS science (250 signatories) • Thrust areas: AMO, XPP, CXI, HED, XCS, SXR • Interested scientists chose team leaders for each area, to interface with SLAC and provide input to instrument design process • AMO & LUSI instrument scientists are in regular contact with AMO, XPP, CXI, and XCS team leaders • Team leaders review and accept instrument physics requirement documents • Workshops have brought many team members to SLAC • LCLS encourages instrument team presence from “Day One” of instrument operation
XPP (Instrument scientist: David Fritz) K. Gaffney (SLAC, leader) D. Reis (U. of MI) T. Tschentscher (DESY) J. Larsson (Lund Inst Tech) CXI (Instrument scientist: Sebastien Boutet) J. Hajdu (SLAC + Uppsala U, leader) H. Chapman (DESY) J. Miao (UCLA) XCS (Instrument scientist: Aymeric Robert) B. Stephenson (ANL, leader) K. Ludwig (Boston U) G. Grübel, DESY Instrument Team Leaders (LUSI)
Instrument Team Leaders (non-LUSI) • AMO (Instrument scientist: John Bozek) • L. Di Mauro (Ohio State, leader) • N. Berrah (Western Michigan U) • SXR (Instrument scientist TBD) • A. Nilsson (Stanford) • W. Wurth (U Hamburg) • HED (Instrument scientist TBD) • R. Lee (LLNL, leader) • P. Heimann (LBNL)
http://www-conf.slac.stanford.edu/ssrl-lcls/2007/lcls-lusi.htmhttp://www-conf.slac.stanford.edu/ssrl-lcls/2007/lcls-lusi.htm
LCLS User Organization Executive Committee • Elected at 2007 LCLS Users Meeting • A. Barty (LLNL) • R. Lee (LLNL) • L. Young (ANL) • First task: create charter • Draft in circulation
2008 LCLS-SSRL User Meeting • 15 October – LCLS agenda • 16 October – Joint SSRL-LCLS agenda • 17 October – SSRL agenda • Associated workshops • AMO • CXI • SXR
Access to LCLS Information • LCLS Web Page • http://lcls.slac.stanford.edu/ • Proposal Submission • Through LCLS web page • Will go live at end of May 2008 • AMO Workshop 2-3 June 2008 • http://www-conf.slac.stanford.edu/amo/2008/ • XPP Workshop 20-21 June 2008 • http://www-conf.slac.stanford.edu/xpp
Startup - LCLS User Program • Pre-Proposal Workshops 6/2008 • Initial Call (AMO): 7/2008 • Proposals due, 1st round: 9/2008 • Notification to users: ~12/2008 • Schedule setting: 1-3/2009
User Access Policy • Description in Jochen Schneider’s talk • DOE-BES Perspective • Demonstrate science potential early in operation • Rapid transit to general user access • Early Productivity: • Select the best science consistent with early operations • Founding instrument teams • General users • Emphasis on efficient use of beam time
Science Program Formulation • LCLS Science Advisory Committee • Review/approve science case for instrument • Review instruments’ scientific productivity • LCLS Proposal Review Panel • Score proposals • Recommend time allocations for proposals
Challenges for the Future • Maximum efficiency of beam time use • setup in one hutch while another operates • best use of split beam • Staffing for instruments • Early and sustained productivity
Summary • LCLS operations organization taking shape • User outreach progressing well • User policy encourages and supports widespread accessibility • LCLS is open for business