1 / 12

Strengthening Administrative Records for Measuring Violence against Women

This regional seminar focuses on strengthening the use of administrative records to measure violence against women. It includes discussions on policy directives, establishment of a central registry, and challenges faced in implementing the project.

hammondp
Download Presentation

Strengthening Administrative Records for Measuring Violence against Women

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ECLAC Regional seminar to strengthen the use of administrative records to measure violence against women Port-of-Spain, Trinidad and Tobago 30th November-1st December 2010

  2. Process • Institutional Strengthening of the Domestic Violence Unit – GOTT/ CIDA (1998) - Policy Roundtable to inform the development of a Central Registry held at Police Administration Bldg. (Feb 1999) - Situational Analysis of the Systems of data collection on Domestic Violence in T&T-Policy directives for the Establishment of a Central Registry. (Mar 1999) - Note to Cabinet recommending that an Inter Agency Task Force be established to review the Report which emanated from the Policy Roundtable with a view to develop a comprehensive national policy to address domestic violence

  3. Process (cont’d) • Cabinet Approval granted to the establishment of Task Force on 23 April 1999. Task Force to comprise: - Representatives of 5 Governmental Agencies - Judiciary/ Magistracy - Representatives of 3 Non-governmental orgs. - Demographer/ Statistician - Information System Specialist

  4. Process (con’t) • Task Force - met for a period of over one year - developed/circulated a draft instrument - several agencies fail to return the completed forms. - Task Force became defunct by 2002. - no Report was submitted. N.B. 3 General Elections 2000 - 2002

  5. Process (cont’d) • Policy Roundtable involving CIDA, ECLAC and stakeholders held to introduce regional instrument (Dec 2002). • Agencies reaffirmed the need for a centralised system but did not commit to using the instrument. • 2003- 2007 Shift in focus to the Preparation of a Police Investigative and Procedural Manual- Report and Note submitted to Cabinet.

  6. Process (con’t) • Committee established under the Ministry of the Attorney General. • Ministry of CDC&GA hosted stakeholders’ workshop in June 2007- agencies expressed interest in resuming project. • Contract awarded to SALISES by Ministry of CDC&GA in September 2008 • Stakeholders’ workshop held in December 2008 to update stakeholders on project status.

  7. Process (con’t) • Pilot of Central Registry • Inter Agency Advisory Committee established. • Monthly meetings held with Consultant. • Contract extended by 6 months to April 2010 to facilitate tasks to be performed by consultant. • Special session held with the THA. • Records of Governmental and Non-Governmental agencies examined.

  8. Opportunities /Lessons Learnt • Commitment of the Consultant. • Improvement in the agencies’ data collection processes. • Institutional memory preserved. • Deepening of interagency collaboration. • Access to technical support from Development Agencies. • Build capacity both at individual and agency level.

  9. Challenges • Political changes – policy shifts. • Insufficient resource personnel in relevant field e.g demographers. • Funds to commit to long term development of project. • Key stakeholders refusal to engage in pilot citing confidentiality concerns. • Changes in public sector personnel.

  10. Challenges • Insufficient appreciation for the CR by policy-makers. • The physical location of the CR.

  11. Way Forward • Commitment by Gov’t to continue the project • Note to be prepared and submitted to Cabinet. • Central Registry to be established even on a phased basis over the next 3 years.

  12. THANK YOU

More Related